Implementation of Good Governance and Government Transformation Programs in Local Authorities: A Case Study of Kelantan, Malaysia

This research examines the implementation of the Good Governance and Government Transformation Programs (GTP) at the local government level in Kelantan between 2010 and 2020. This timeframe reflects the implementation of the GTP by the Malaysian government. The study aims to evaluate how local governments implement The Government Transformation Programs within the framework of good governance. This research employs a qualitative case study approach guided by the UNDP (1997) good governance model and the Modified Political System Theory. The findings indicate that local governments, as the closest administrative units to citizens, functioned as mediators between federal and state governments, enabling impartial governance implementation. Their practices demonstrated an adaptation of federal and state approaches to local socio-economic, political, and cultural contexts. This coordination shows that elements of good governance emerged as the GTP’s top-down initiatives were operationalized through bottom-up processes. However, the local governments’ ability to implement key indicators of good governance participation, transparency, and accountability varied across the indicators.

Transformation, good governance, local authorities, accountability

1. Abang Ahmad, D.H., Joseph, C., & Said, R. (2021). Disclosure of Accountability Practices on Websites of Malaysian City Councils. Management & Accounting Review (MAR), 20(1), 85-112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdul Rahman, E. (1996). Social Transformation, the State and the Middle Classes in Post-Independence Malaysia. Southeast Asian Studies, 34(3), 524-547. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abdul Rahman, M.Z., Mohamad, M.T., & Abdul Azzis, M.S. (2020). Islam Dan Pembasmian Kemiskinan Bandar. Jurnal Syariah, 28(3), 461-500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adnan, M.A.A., Noor, R.M., Rahim, A.H.A., Yaacob, N.A., & Najid, N.A. (2019). Negara dan transformasi pembangunan jaringan keselamatan sosial di Malaysia. Gading Journal for Social Sciences, 22(00), 162-175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ali, M.A.M., & Arifin, K. (2020). Penglibatan Awam Sebagai Pembuat Keputusan Dalam Rancangan Tempatan Pihak Berkuasa Tempatan. Akademika, 90(1), 151-163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al-Qudsy, S.H.S.I., Rahman, A.A., & Zain, M.I.B.M. (2008). Efektif Governan dan Pelaksanaannya Dalam Pentadbiran Islam. Jurnal Shariah, 16, 465-496. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Al-Qudsy, S.I., & Hayaati, S. (2004). Efektif Governan di Malaysia: Menurut Perspektif Islam. University of Malaya Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brookfield, H. (1994). Industrialization and Political Change. Dlm H. Brookfield (ed.). Transformation with Industrialization in Peninsular Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ishak, S., & Omar, A.R.C. (2017). Keusahawanan sosial sebagai satu pendekatan inovatif ke arah transformasi sosial masyarakat: Kajian kes di Malaysia. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11(8), 38-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jamaiudin, N. (2019). Good Governance in Malaysia: Assessing Public Perceptions on the Implementation of National Transformation Policy, 2011-2016. Intellectual Discourse, 27(SI# 1), 719-743. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Meerangani, K.A. (2018). Isu Penerapan Nilai Islam Dalam Penguatkuasaan Pihak Berkuasa Tempatan di Malaysia. Journal of Contempory Islamic Studies, 4(2), 80-98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mohamad, S.A., Aiyub, K., & Awang, A. (2016). Transformasi luar bandar dan perubahan kehidupan masyarakat: kajian kes di Kelantan dan Negeri Sembilan. Geografi, 4(2), 83-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mohd, Y., & Chong, S.Y. (2004). Principles and Parctices of Good Governance The Way Forward for Sabah. Sabah: Institute for Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nen, Z.M., & Ahmad, J. (2017). An Assessment of PPP Experiment in Malaysia: A Good Governance Perspective. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Phang, S.N. (1997). Sistem Kerajaan Tempatan Di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Phang, S.N. (2008). Decentralisation Or Recentralisation? Trends In Local Government In Malaysia. Commonwealth Journal Of Local Government, 1, 126-132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Phang, S.N. (2011). ‘Decentralization And Local Governance In Malaysia’, In Evan, Berman, M. (Ed.) Public Administration In Southeast Asia. Taylor And Francis Group. New York: 155-169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Phang, S.N. (2013). Transforming Central-Local Government Relations And Decentralization: A Study On China And Selected ASEAN Nations. China-ASEAN Perspective Forum. Vol. 3(1), June/July 2013, 3-16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Phang, S.N.; Kuppusamy S.; Noor Azina, I., & Noriza, R.A. (2009). Report on Local Government And Financial Sustainability: A Regional Comparison. University Of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Said, J., Alam, M.M., & Khalid, M.A. (2016). Relationship between good governance and integrity system: Empirical study on the public sector of Malaysia. Humanomics. 32(2), 151-171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Salleh, D., & Khalid, S.N.A. (2011). Accountability Practice At Local Government Of Malaysia. In 2nd International Conference On Business And Economics Research Proceeding. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Siddiquee, N.A. (2014). The Government Transformation Programme In Malaysia: A Shining Example Of Performance Management In The Public Sector? Asian Journal Of Political Science. 22(3), 268-288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Siddiquee, N.A., & Mohamed, M.Z. (2007). Paradox of public sector reforms in Malaysia: A good governance perspective. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(3/4), 284-312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Siddiquee, N.A., Xavier, J. A., & Mohamed, M. Z. (2019). What works and why? Lessons from public management reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(1), 14-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tahir, Z., Malek, J.A., Selvadurai, S., & Hussain, Y. (2019). Transformasi memajukan industri kecil dan sederhana (IKS) di kalangan wanita luar bandar. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 15(4), 151-171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. UNDP (1998). Principles of Good Governance. Jakarta: UNDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. UNDP (1997). Governance for Sustainable Human Development, A UNDP policy paper UNDP 1997, p 2-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. UNDP(2007). Governance For Sustainable Human Development: A UNDP Policy Document, http://www.pogar.org/publications/other/undp/governance/undppolicydoc97-e.pdf,29 September 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yusoff, N. (2018). Pembangunan lestari dalam transformasi Malaysia. Sintok: UUM Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Financial Availability and Its Influence on Women’s Economic Empowerment in Kakamega County, Kenya
• Transformative Rural Land Governance For Gender Empowerment In Ethiopia: The Case Of Amhara Regional State Rural Land Policy
• PNP Patrol Operations: Experiences, Aspirations, and Policy Insights
• Public Policies within Mexico´S Fourth Transformation (4T) and Their Communication Strategies: Influence on University Citizenship (Mexico, 2018–2024)