Developing Digital Community as Social Support Network for Drug Addict Families: A Conceptual Paper
Authors
Faculty of General Studies and Advanced Learning, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu (Malaysia)
Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu (Malaysia)
Faculty of General Studies and Advanced Learning, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu (Malaysia)
Faculty of General Studies and Advanced Learning, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.930000054
Subject Category: Social -science
Volume/Issue: 9/30 | Page No: 402-408
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-10
Accepted: 2025-12-17
Published: 2025-12-27
Abstract
Families caring for individuals with drug addiction often experience significant strain arising from stigma, social isolation, and limited institutional support. These pressures contribute to sustained psychological distress, particularly as existing informal networks and overstretched professional services remain inadequate in addressing the complex and ongoing challenges faced by caregivers. Although previous studies have acknowledged the emotional burden borne by families, less attention has been given to the potential role of dedicated digital platforms in strengthening tailored social support networks for this vulnerable group. This paper aims to address the potential of digital community to support families affected by addiction. The paper conducted on a library-based conceptual analysis, this paper argues that a well-designed digital community has the capacity to function as a meaningful support environment. The searching term include family addiction support, digital community, online peer support, addiction stigma, caregiver resilience, and digital mental health. Findings conclude virtual refuge, mediated peer connection, informational resilience, collective advocacy and adaptive digital are the potential for contribution to collective empowerment by offering a space where families can build shared understanding and challenge broader societal misconceptions. The development of these community-oriented digital spaces therefore represents a promising avenue for reducing family isolation and enhancing overall well-being among those affected by drug addiction. The risk and challenges also future research also discussed details in this paper.
Keywords
Digital Support, Addiction Families, Online Communities, Stigma Mitigation, Caregiver Resilience
Downloads
References
1. Arcidiacono, C., et al. (2021). Families living with addiction: Burden, resilience, and support needs. Journal of Family Studies, 27(4), 563–579. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Arnett, J. J. (2014). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11(2), 123–151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Copello, A., & Walsh, K. (2017). Families, Friends and Addiction: Impacts, Psychological Models and Interventions. Addiction, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489710.ch3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Fortuna KL, Naslund JA, LaCroix JM, Bianco CL, Brooks JM, Zisman-Ilani Y, Muralidharan A, Deegan P. Digital Peer Support Mental Health Interventions for People With a Lived Experience of a Serious Mental Illness: Systematic Review JMIR Ment Health 2020;7(4):e16460 doi: 10.2196/16460 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Jones, A., et al. (2024). Courtesy stigma and health behaviors among families of people who use substances. Substance Use & Misuse. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2340971 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Jones, A., Sharples, D., Burton, S., Montgomery, C., & Rose, A. K. (2024). The Associations among Perceived Courtesy Stigma, Health and Social Behaviours in Family Members and Friends of People Who Use Substances: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. Substance Use & Misuse, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2340971 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363–385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Marshall P, Booth M, Coole M, Fothergill L, Glossop Z, Haines J, Harding A, Johnston R, Jones S, Lodge C, Machin K, Meacock R, Nielson K, Puddephatt JA, Rakic T, Rayson P, Robinson H, Rycroft-Malone J, Shryane N, Swithenbank Z, Wise S, Lobban F.(2024). Understanding the Impacts of Online Mental Health Peer Support Forums: Realist Synthesis. JMIR Ment Health. 2024 May 9;11:e55750. doi: 10.2196/55750. PMID: 38722680; PMCID: PMC11117133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Murphy, J. W., & Callaghan, K. A. (1988). Systems theory and the family: A critique. Early Child Development and Care, 39(1), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443880390113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Porciello, C. (2024). Courtesy stigma in the families of patients with severe mental disorders: an obstacle to the recovery process? Journal of Advanced Health Care, 6(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. https://doi.org/10.36017/jahc202463301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Room, R. (2005). Stigma, social inequality and alcohol and drug use. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24(2), 143–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide: The Essential Guide to New Media and Social Inequality (4th ed.). Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don't ride alone. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167–194). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. White, M., & Dorman, S. M. (2001). Receiving social support online: Implications for health education. Health Education Research, 16(6), 693–707. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Life and Livelihood of Women in the Sundarbans: A Survey
- Examine the Reasons Behind the Academic Low Performance of Female Pupils at Elengaz Mixed Primary School in Khartoum State, Sudan.
- Arabic Language Attrition and State Stability: Empirical Validation of the SPH-LENS Framework in the Arab World
- Problems of Teaching English Conversation by Using Communicative Approach among Secondary School Teachers in Kirkuk Province