Bridging Surplus and Sustainability: A Sharing Economy Approach to Food Waste Reduction in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions

Authors

Farah Roslan

Faculty of General Studies & Advance Education, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Nur Syifaa Athirah Mohd Said

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Nur Izzati Ab Ghani

Faculty of General Studies & Advance Education, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Hawa Husna Ab Ghani

Faculty of General Studies & Advance Education, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Nooramira Ghazali

Faculty of General Studies & Advance Education, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.930000058

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 9/30 | Page No: 437-447

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-10

Accepted: 2025-12-16

Published: 2025-12-27

Abstract

Food waste is a pressing global challenge with significant environmental, social, and ethical implications, and higher education institutions (HEIs) are increasingly recognized as important actors in addressing this issue. Despite growing interest in sustainability, food redistribution initiatives within many HEIs remain fragmented and largely ineffective. This study explores the potential of applying sharing economy principles to food waste minimization at Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Malaysia. Qualitative data were collected through six semi-structured interviews with students, academic staff, and support personnel across UniSZA’s campuses.
The findings reveal two key barriers to food redistribution: social stigma and safety concerns. Stigma discouraged students from accepting surplus food due to fears of embarrassment or negative social judgement, while safety concerns particularly related to food hygiene, freshness, and liability undermined trust and limited willingness to participate in redistribution efforts. In contrast, three main drivers were identified: moral norms, social norms, and incentives. Moral and religious values encouraged food sharing as an ethical responsibility to avoid waste, while social norms supported redistribution as an accepted practice within campus communities. Incentives, such as recognition or symbolic rewards, were perceived as supportive mechanisms to sustain participation, provided they did not replace intrinsic motivations.
These findings align with core sharing economy principles, where moral and social norms reflect reciprocity, incentives function as mechanisms of value creation, and stigma and safety concerns highlight trust as a critical condition for participation. The study offers practical implications for policymakers and university administrators, emphasizing the need for formal redistribution procedures, stigma-reducing and dignified mechanisms, and clear food safety governance. By embedding sharing economy principles into institutional systems, HEIs can transform informal food-sharing practices into structured and scalable solutions that contribute to sustainable food waste reduction.

Keywords

Sharing economy; food waste reduction; sustainability

Downloads

References

1. Akma, N., Saad, R., Rahman, R. A., Syed Omar, S. R., & Hashim, H. (2022). Sustainable campus: Engaging university stakeholders in campus sustainability through the sharing economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 338, 130493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amaral, J. F., & Orsato, R. J. (2022). Digital platforms for food waste reduction: The value for consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367, 132938. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amrutkar, A., Raj, M., Dutta, P., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2024). ECOFEAST: Developing a digital platform for food surplus redistribution in India. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 198, 107224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barr, N. (2025). Risk-sharing in pension plans: Multiple options. Economics and Philosophy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Borusiak, B., & Knežević, B. (2024). Surplus food redistribution systems: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425, 138674. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brookes, L. (1979). A low energy strategy for the UK. Atom, 269, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cesnuitytė, V., Nierling, L., & Behrendt, S. (2022). Critical perspectives on the sharing economy: Inequality, trust, and sustainability. In V. Cesnuitytė, C. Miguel, G. Avram, J. Schor, L. Nierling, & S. Behrendt (Eds.), The sharing economy in Europe: Developments, practices, and contradictions (pp. 393–411). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, Y. (2022). Digital trust in sharing economy platforms: Evidence from food redistribution apps. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121823. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chen, Y. (2024). The sharing economy: Analyses and perspectives from an economic perspective. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cosme, D., Chan, H. Y., Sinclair, A. H., Benitez, C., Lydic, K., Martin, R., … Scholz, C. (2025). Perceived self and social relevance of content motivates news sharing across cultures and topics. PNAS Nexus. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Curtis, S. K., & Mont, O. (2020). Sharing economy business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121519. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. D’amato, D., & Korhonen, J. (2021). Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework. Ecological Economics, 188, 107143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. El Zein, A., Mathews, A. E., House, L., & Shelnutt, K. P. (2019). Why are hungry college students not seeking help? Predictors of and barriers to using an on-campus food pantry. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 14(6), 725–740. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Evans, D. (2011). Blaming the consumer–once again: The social and material contexts of everyday food waste practices in some English households. Critical Public Health, 21(4), 429–440. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Falcone, P. M., & Imbert, E. (2017). Bringing a sharing economy approach into the food sector: The potential of food sharing for reducing food waste. In P. Morone, F. Papendiek, & V. Tartiu (Eds.), Food waste reduction and valorisation: Sustainability assessment and policy analysis (pp. 197–214). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Faraji, M., Seifdar, M. H., & Amiri, B. (2023). Sharing economy for sustainability: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 140065. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Farr-Wharton, G., Choi, J. H. J., & Foth, M. (2014). Food talks back: Exploring the role of mobile applications in reducing domestic food waste. Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Filho, W. L., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Ávila, L. V., Brandli, L. L., & Caeiro, S. (2021). Sustainable food consumption in higher education institutions: An international comparative study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127937. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Galvin, R. (2020). Who co-opted our energy efficiency gains? A sociology of macro-level rebound effects and US car makers. Energy Policy, 142, 111548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy–A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ghazali, M. S. M., Mupit, M., Azni, M. E., & Yaacob, Z. (2025). Sustainable food waste management in UniKL MICET: Challenges in translating awareness into action. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Environment Management, 10, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Giannoccaro, I., Ceccarelli, G., & Fraccascia, L. (2021). Features of the higher education for the circular economy: The case of Italy. Sustainability, 13(20), 11338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Greening, L. A., Greene, D. L., & Difiglio, C. (2000). Energy efficiency and consumption—The rebound effect—A survey. Energy Policy, 28(6), 389–401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047–2059. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Haryanto, B., & Alshoushan, A. J. (2025). The influence of digital marketing on innovative performance with knowledge sharing as a mediation variable in five-star hotels. Journal of Social Research, 4(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hua, J., Dong, Y., Gao, J., & Li, J. (2023). Factors influencing purchase intention of food surplus through online sharing platforms in China. Sustainability, 15(6), 5412. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Jevons, W. S. (1865). The coal question: An inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines. Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. (2022). Food insecurity on college and university campuses: A context review. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 122(6), 1231–1245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kirchherr, J., & Piscicelli, L. (2019). Towards an education for the circular economy (ECE): Five teaching principles and a case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 150, 104406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kopnina, H., & Padfield, R. (2021). (Im) possibilities of ‘circular’ production: Learning from corporate case studies of (un) sustainability. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 12, 100161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kuhn, M., Baumann, M., Volz, F., & Stojanović, L. (2025). Digital product passport design supporting the circular economy based on the asset administration shell. Sustainability, 17(3), 969. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Li, X., & Schnedler, W. (2025). Sharing the fame but taking the blame: When declaring a single person responsible solves a free rider problem. Management Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Lian, Q. L., Wong, I. A., & Xiong, X. (2025). Motivating social media sharing of food user-generated content on Instagram: How incentives drive social commerce. Tourism Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ling, J. (2023). The evolution, impact and future of the sharing economy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Makov, A. S., Krones, J., Gupta, C., & Chertow, M. (2020). Social and environmental analysis of food waste abatement via the peer-to-peer sharing economy. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Makov, T., & Vivanco, D. F. (2018). Does the circular economy grow the pie? The case of rebound effects from smartphone reuse. Frontiers in Energy Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Martinez-Sanchez, V., Tonini, D., Møller, F., & Astrup, T. F. (2016). Life-cycle costing of food waste management in Denmark: Importance of indirect effects. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(8), 4513–4523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Meshulam, A., Frenkel, A., & Tchetchik, A. (2022). Sharing economy rebound: The case of peer-to-peer sharing of surplus food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 130478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Miguel, C., Avram, G., & De Paoli, S. (2022). Trust, reputation, and participation in the sharing economy. In V. Cesnuitytė, C. Miguel, G. Avram, J. Schor, L. Nierling, & S. Behrendt (Eds.), The sharing economy in Europe: Developments, practices, and contradictions (pp. 33–52). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Moltene, J., & Orsato, R. J. (2022). The sharing economy in practice: An exploratory study of the Ecofood digital platform in Brazil. Journal of Business Research, 146, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Nikishina, E. (2020). Trust and sharing platforms: The role of digital verification in consumer adoption. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(3), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., Steinberger, J. K., Wright, N., & bin Ujang, Z. (2019). The food waste hierarchy as a framework for managing food surplus and food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., & Ormazabal, M. (2018). Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Puram, P., & Gurumurthy, A. (2023). Sharing economy in the food sector: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 56, 150–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Ritter, M., & Schanz, H. (2019). The sharing economy: A comprehensive business model framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 320–331. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Salemdeeb, R., Font Vivanco, D., Al-Tabbaa, A., & zu Ermgassen, E. K. H. J. (2017). A holistic approach to the environmental evaluation of food waste prevention. Waste Management, 59, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Sales, A., Oliveira, R., & Silva, M. (2021). Building trust in digital platforms for sharing surplus food: A design guidelines perspective. Sustainability, 13(4), 1768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Shi, X., Zhu, Z., Wu, J., & Li, Z. (2025). A study on the carbon emission reduction pathways of China’s digital economy from multiple perspectives. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Simonovits, B., & Balázs, B. (2022). Food sharing and food insecurity in the sharing economy. In V. Cesnuitytė, C. Miguel, G. Avram, J. Schor, L. Nierling, & S. Behrendt (Eds.),The sharing economy in Europe: Developments, practices, and contradictions (pp. 143–161). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Solovyeva, A., Jokinen, J. C., & Kortelainen, M. (2023). To share or not? Drivers and barriers of sustainable peer-to-peer food sharing. Sustainability, 15(2), 1107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Sorrell, S. (2007). The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UK Energy Research Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Spindeldreher, K., & Teubner, T. (2018). A stakeholder view on reputation systems in the sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 86, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Srivastava, S., Kumar, V., & Singh, A. (2024). Food waste in academic institutions: Causes, consequences, and interventions. Sustainability, 16(2), 812. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. SWCorp. (2020). Laporan Kajian Sisa Makanan Kebangsaan. Solid Waste Management and Public Cleansing Corporation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Treitler, I. (2024). Sharing economy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Food Waste Index Report 2021. United Nations Environment Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., & Chiesa, V. (2017). Towards a new taxonomy of circular economy business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Velenturf, A. P., & Purnell, P. (2021). Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1437–1457. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Wani, N. R., Rather, R. A., Farooq, A., Padder, S. A., Baba, T. R., Sharma, S., ... & Ara, S. (2024). New insights in food security and environmental sustainability through waste food management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(12), 17835–17857. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Ye, Z., Wang, J., & Zhao, H. (2025). Blockchain for mass customization: The value of information sharing through data accuracy by contract coordination. Mathematics, 13(3), 404. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles