Optimization of 3D‑Printed Patterns Parameters and Two‑Stage Burnout Process for Defect Reduction in Propeller Blades Investment Casting Shell Mold

This study investigates the optimization of 3D-printed investment casting patterns and two-stage burnout parameters to minimize defects in propeller blade manufacturing. A full factorial design of experiments (2⁴) was implemented to analyze the effects of four fused deposition modeling (FDM) parameters—shell thickness, infill density, layer height, and internal pattern structure—on burnout performance. Thirty-two PLA patterns were fabricated and evaluated through a two-stage burnout process: Stage 1 (200–350 °C) assessed air permeability, while Stage 2 (up to 650 °C) examined surface integrity using dye penetrant testing and visual crack inspection. Statistical analysis using GLM ANOVA revealed that air permeability exhibited no significant main effects but was influenced by higher-order interactions, notably Infill× Shell× Pattern (F = 5.067, p = 0.03879) and Layer× Shell× Pattern (F = 6.975, p = 0.01779). Dye penetrant indications were dominated by shell thickness (F = 2135.9, p ≈ 1.84e⁻18), with layer height and multiple interactions also significant. Visual cracking was strongly associated with shell thickness (Fisher exact p = 0.00245), with 1 mm shells reducing defects compared to 2 mm. The findings underscore that shell thickness is the primary factor for Stage 2 defect mitigation, while Stage 1 optimization requires joint tuning of shell, infill, and pattern parameters. The proposed two-stage burnout workflow enables early identification of critical factor combinations, offering a robust approach for improving dimensional integrity and surface quality in additively manufactured investment casting applications.

Additive Manufacturing; Investment Casting; Two‑Stage Burnout

1. Campbell, J. (2015). Complete casting handbook: Metal casting processes, metallurgy, techniques and design (2nd ed.). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-16361-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abisuga, O. A., Doran, K., & de Beer, D. (2022). Study of investment casting process for 3D printed jewellery design. MATEC Web of Conferences, 370, 04002. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202237004002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Jones, S., & Yuan, C. (2003). Advances in shell moulding for investment casting. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 135(2–3), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00828-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hague, R., Campbell, I., & Dickens, P. (2003). Implications on design of rapid manufacturing. Proc. IMechE Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 217(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440603762554587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chhabra, M., & Singh, R. (2011). Rapid casting solutions: A review. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 17(5), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541111156469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Snelling, D., Li, Q., Meisel, N., Williams, C., & Batra, R. (2015). The effects of 3D printed molds on metal casting. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 19, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018). Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bassoli, E., Gatto, A., Iuliano, L., & Violante, M. G. (2007). 3D printing technique applied to rapid casting. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 13(3), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540710750898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Singh, R., & Sachdeva, A. (2011). Optimization of investment casting process parameters using DOE. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22(4), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381111126401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kumar, S., & Kruth, J. P. (2010). Composites by rapid prototyping technology. Materials & Design, 31(2), 850–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Yarlagadda, P. K. D. V., & Cheng, C. K. (2001). Thermal stresses in investment casting shells. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 110(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00804-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ding, D., Pan, Z., Cuiuri, D., & Li, H. (2015). Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81, 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7077-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kumar, P., Ahuja, I. P. S., & Singh, R. (2012). Application of fusion deposition modelling for rapid investment casting. International Journal of Materials Engineering Innovation, 3(3), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMATEI.2012.050613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ferreira, J. C., Mateus, A., & Alves, N. (2007). Rapid tooling aided by reverse engineering. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 183(2–3), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Zhang, Y., Chou, K., & He, Y. (2016). Numerical investigation of gas escape in investment casting shells. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 138(11), 111005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033865 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Bassoli, E., Atzeni, E., Salmi, A., & Calignano, F. (2018). Additive manufacturing for investment casting applications. Procedia CIRP, 70, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Singh, S., Ramakrishna, S., & Berto, F. (2020). 3D printing of polymer composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 191, 107938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. ASTM E1417/E1417M-16 (2016). Standard practice for liquid penetrant testing. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/E1417_E1417M-16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gibson, I., Rosen, D., & Stucker, B. (2015). Additive manufacturing technologies (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kalpakjian, S., & Schmid, S. (2014). Manufacturing engineering and technology (7th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• LeafQuest: A Mobile-Based Augmented Reality for Plant Placement, Discovery, and Growth
• Participatory Ergonomic Intervention Approach on Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD) in Construction Sectors: A Systematic Review
• Integrating GIS into Traffic Incident Management: A Web-Based System
• RideSmart: A Personalized Motorcycle Product Recommendation System Using TF-IDF and Descriptive Analytics for Javidson Motorshop
• Educational Technology Course Design in Pre-Service Teachers Education: A Bibliometric Review of the Research Landscape