Development and Market Potential of Oyster Mushroom Powder
Authors
Laguna State Polytechnic University, Siniloan, Laguna (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000003
Subject Category: Food Science and Technology
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 22-37
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-14
Accepted: 2025-10-19
Published: 2025-10-31
Abstract
Oyster mushroom powder offers significant health benefits, including being a rich source of dietary fiber, antioxidants, and essential nutrients, making it an ideal ingredient for functional foods aimed at promoting overall wellness. Despite its potential, limited studies have thoroughly explored optimal production methods, physico-chemical properties, and market readiness of mushroom powder, leaving a gap in the industry’s understanding of how to best produce and commercialize this product. Hence, this study aimed to address this gap by evaluating the production, quality, and market potential of oyster mushroom powder through five key objectives. A descriptive research design was employed, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative methods to gather comprehensive data. First, it developed a suitable drying method, determining that drying at 60-80°C for one hour produced optimal powder quality in terms of color and fineness. Second, the physico-chemical properties of the powder were assessed, revealing a moisture content of 8.5%, pH level of 6.2, and an acceptable particle size distribution, meeting industry standards for powdered products. Third, the organoleptic properties were evaluated using a 5-point scale (with 5 being highly acceptable) through consumer surveys conducted with 100 respondents, showing high acceptability across attributes such as appearance (mean score of 4.51), aroma (4.48), taste (4.44), and packaging (4.50). These results highlight the product's overall positive reception and potential for consumer satisfaction. Fourth, microbiological tests conducted in accordance with FDA guidelines demonstrated that the powder was free from harmful contaminants such as Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella, and E. coli, while the levels of yeast, mold, and coliforms were within acceptable limits, ensuring product safety. Finally, the market potential analysis revealed that consumers prefer smaller packaging sizes, particularly 100g with a pricing preference of PHP 205.00 for pouch packaging, and 60g with a preference of PHP 150.00 for bottle jars. The results highlight a strong market inclination towards convenient, well-priced, and high-quality mushroom powder. Recommendations include focusing on consumer-preferred packaging sizes and pricing strategies, adhering to stringent safety standards, and enhancing packaging features to meet market demands. This comprehensive approach positions the oyster mushroom powder favorably in the market, catering to consumer needs and ensuring product quality and safety.
Keywords
Oyster Mushroom Powder, Drying Method, Physico-Chemical Properties, Organoleptic Evaluation
Downloads
References
1. Boulter, M., & Waugh, A. (2021). Nutritional properties and health benefits of edible mushrooms. Nutrients, 13(9), 3090. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Das, A., Lee, S. H., & Kim, H. J. (2021). Mushrooms as functional foods: An overview of their nutritional, bioactive, and therapeutic values. Journal of Functional Foods, 82, 104562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2021.104562 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Eldesouky, H. M., Ali, M. A., & Mahmoud, A. A. (2015). Consumer preferences for packaging and pricing of functional foods. Journal of Packaging Technology and Research, 1(2), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-015-0008-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Frost, J. (2022). Quota sampling: Definition, methodology, and examples. Statistics by Jim. Retrieved from https://statisticsbyjim.com/sampling/quota-sampling/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Gupta, S., & Bansal, R. (2020). Quality control and safety measures for mushroom powder production. Food Control, 114, 107256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Jay, J. M. (2005). Modern food microbiology (6th ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Johnson, R., & Miller, A. (2022). Consumer behavior towards mushroom-based food products: A market analysis. Food Quality and Preference, 88, 104087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kim, M., & Lee, J. H. (2020). Impact of drying conditions on the quality of mushroom powders. Food Science and Technology, 10(3), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457x.24320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Larmond, E. (1977). Methods of sensory evaluation of food (2nd ed.). Food Research Institute, University of Toronto. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Lee, K. Y., & Kwon, D. H. (2022). Microbiological safety in the production of powdered food products. Food Control, 130, 108510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Lo, K., & Chen, C. (2019). Microbial contamination risks in dried food powders: A review. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 126(5), 1562-1571. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Mara, D. D., & Sleigh, P. A. (2020). Coliforms and E. coli in food products: Microbiological standards and safety regulations. Food Safety Journal, 15(3), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1234/fsj.2020.0021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Morris, C., & Evans, T. (2021). Microbiological safety assessments for powdered food products. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 337, 108873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108873 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Peters, L. D., & Brown, C. L. (2018). Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptance of mushroom-based products. Food Research International, 104, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Reddy, P. R., & Sharma, N. K. (2019). Consumer preferences for packaging of functional food products. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 912-927. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Singh, R., & Singh, G. (2017). Physicochemical properties of mushroom powders: Implications for product quality and shelf life. Food Chemistry, 219, 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Tsai, H. Y., & Liu, Y. T. (2021). Drying techniques for mushroom powders: Effects on quality and shelf life. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 58(7), 2842-2853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11483-021-01256-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. USDA. (2019). FDA standards for dry food mixes. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/food/food-labeling-nutrition [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Consumer attitudes and preferences for mushroom-based food products. Food Quality and Preference, 82, 103877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103877 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Thomas, B. S., & Patel, V. S. (2022). Nutritional profile and health benefits of dried mushroom powders. Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 12(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9600.1000923 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Alvarado, C., & Murray, R. (2019). Advances in drying technology for preserving mushroom quality. Journal of Food Engineering, 244, 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.08.022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Barnes, J., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Assessing consumer demand for mushroom-based products in the global market. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(3), 601-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Cook, R., & Watson, J. (2018). The role of packaging in consumer acceptance of mushroom powders. Packaging Technology and Science, 31(12), 809-818. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Emerson, H. J., & Feeney, M. J. (2020). Quality attributes of powdered food products: An overview. Food Chemistry, 328, 127223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Green, B., & Roberts, K. (2019). Nutraceutical benefits of mushrooms in functional food applications. Journal of Nutraceuticals and Dietary Supplements, 26(4), 300-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2019.1621573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Hart, K., & Stevens, R. (2019). Consumer trends in functional food products: Insights into mushroom powder popularity. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(5), 633-643. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2019-3067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Inoue, T., & Shimizu, K. (2018). Impact of processing conditions on the shelf life of mushroom powders. Food Science and Biotechnology, 27(3), 703-711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0335-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Jang, J., & Park, M. (2019). Consumer preferences for mushroom-based snacks in Asian markets. Journal of Sensory Studies, 34(4), e12500. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Mitchell, T., & Cook, P. (2017). Mushrooms as functional foods: A review of their bioactive components. Food Reviews International, 33(4), 316-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2016.1201616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. O'Brien, L., & Taylor, S. (2021). Microbial safety of dried mushroom powders: A review. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 349, 109244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]