Effective School Bullying Prevention Strategies: A Thematic Review

School bullying remains a persistent challenge that affects student well-being, academic performance, and the overall learning environment. Despite the increasing number of intervention programs worldwide, questions remain about the key determinants that shape their effectiveness. This study aimed to identify and thematise the factors that influence the success of school bullying prevention strategies. Guided by the PRISMA protocol, 19 peer-reviewed articles were identified, screened, and systematically synthesised using a thematic review approach. The analysis revealed six key strategies that contribute to effective prevention: fostering a favourable school climate, ensuring program fidelity, strengthening teacher efficacy, promoting socioemotional regulation, increasing peer support, and incorporating parental involvement. These findings underscore the importance of a holistic, multi-stakeholder approach in designing and implementing interventions.

school bullying, prevention strategies

1. Acquadro Maran, D., Tirassa, M., & Begotti, T. (2017). Teachers’ intervention in school Bullying: A qualitative analysis on italian Teachers. Frontiers in Education, 2, 36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adewoye, S. E., & Du Plessis, A. (2021). Self-debasing cognitive distortions restructuring intervention down regulate bystanders emotional and behavioural reactions to witnessing school bullying. Qualitative Report, 26(9), 2924–2942. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Albayrak, S., Yildiz, A., & Erol, S. (2016). Assessing the effect of school bullying prevention programs on reducing bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 63, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arënliu, A., Strohmeier, D., Konjufca, J., Yanagida, T., & Burger, C. (2020). Empowering the Peer Group to Prevent School Bullying in Kosovo: Effectiveness of a Short and Ultra-Short Version of the ViSC Social Competence Program. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2(1), 65–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Begotti, T., Tirassa, M., & Acquadro Maran, D. (2017). School bullying episodes: attitudes and intervention in pre-service and in-service Italian teachers. Research Papers in Education, 32(2), 170–182. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bowser, J., Bellmore, A. D., & Larson, J. D. (2020). Use and Impact of the Wisconsin Bullying Prevention Program Assessment Tool in Addressing Middle School Bullying. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2(4), 280–291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting. Health Psychology Review, 17(4), 695–718. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cross, D. S., Runions, K. C., & Pearce, N. L. (2021). Friendly schools’ bullying prevention research: Implications for school counsellors. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 31(2), 146–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Farley, J. (2018). Teachers as obligated bystanders: Grading and relating administrator support and peer response to teacher direct intervention in school bullying. Psychology in the Schools, 55(9), 1056–1070. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fauzan, H., & Sulaeman, D. (2024). Overcoming bullying in the educational environment: prevention and intervention strategies in schools. Journal of English Language and Education, 9(4), 12–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fischer, S. M., John, N., & Bilz, L. (2021). Teachers’ Self-efficacy in Preventing and Intervening in School Bullying: a Systematic Review. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 3(3), 196–212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Examining the Effectiveness of School-Bullying Intervention Programs Globally: a Meta-analysis. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(1), 14–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Garandeau, C. F., Vartio, A., Poskiparta, E. H., & Salmivalli, C. (2016). School Bullies’ Intention to Change Behavior Following Teacher Interventions: Effects of Empathy Arousal, Condemning of Bullying, and Blaming of the Perpetrator. Prevention Science, 17(8), 1034–1043. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gerlinger, J., & Wo, J. C. (2016). Preventing School Bullying: Should Schools Prioritise an Authoritative School Discipline Approach Over Security Measures? Journal of School Violence, 15(2), 133–157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. González Moreno, A., & Molero Jurado, M. del M. (2023). Healthy lifestyle in adolescence: Associations with stress, self-esteem and the roles of school violence. Healthcare, 12(1), 63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Han, Y., Song, A., & Um, S. (2021). Implementation and evaluation of the Youth Police Academy school bullying prevention program in South Korea. International Journal of Educational Research, 110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lee, J., Kim, J., & Kim, B. N. (2021). Effects of school bullying prevention camp on the adolescent perpetrators of school violence. Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32(2), 43–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lester, L. J., Pearce, N. L., Waters, S. K., Barnes, A., Beatty, S. E., & Cross, D. S. (2017). Family Involvement in a Whole-School Bullying Intervention: Mothers’ and Fathers’ Communication and Influence with Children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(10), 2716–2727. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Li, Y., Chen, P. Y., Chen, F., & Chen, Y. (2017). Preventing School Bullying: Investigation of the Link between Anti-Bullying Strategies, Prevention Ownership, Prevention Climate, and Prevention Leadership. Applied Psychology, 66(4), 577–598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Martínez-Sánchez, I., Goig-Martínez, R. M., González-González, D., & Alvarez-Rodríguez, J. (2019). School bullying in compulsory and advanced secondary education. Determining factors in its intervention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Martinot, D., Beaton, A., Tougas, F., Redersdorff, S., & Rinfret, N. (2020). Links between psychological disengagement from school and different forms of self-esteem in the crucial period of early and mid-adolescence. Social Psychology of Education, 23(6), 1539–1564. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Menon, J. M. L., Struijs, F., & Whaley, P. (2022). The methodological rigour of systematic reviews in environmental health. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 52(3), 167–187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 339(7716), 332–336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Panosso, M. G., Kienen, N., & Brino, R. D. F. (2023). Teacher Training for Prevention and Management of School Bullying Situations: A Systematic Literature Review; Treinamento de Professores para Prevenção e Manejo de Situações de Bullying Escolar: Uma Revisão Sistemática de Literatura. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Silva, J. L. da, Oliveira, W. A. de, Zequinão, M. A., Lizzi, E. A. da S., Pereira, B. O., & Silva, M. A. I. (2018). Results from interventions addressing social skills to reduce school bullying: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Trends in Psychology, 26, 509–522. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tian, Y., Yang, J., Huang, F., Zhang, X., Wang, X., Fan, L., Du, W., & Xue, H. (2023). An Analysis of the Association between School Bullying Prevention and Control Measures and Secondary School Students’ Bullying Behavior in Jiangsu Province. Behavioral Sciences, 13(11). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tracy, S. J. (2024). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Tzani-Pepelasi, C., Ioannou, M., Synnott, J., & McDonnell, D. (2019). Peer Support at Schools: the Buddy Approach as a Prevention and Intervention Strategy for School Bullying. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(2), 111–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wang, D., Zhang, Y., Tian, H., Sun, H., Wang, K., Su, M., & Wei, Y. (2024). The relationship between being bullied and bystander intervention in adolescent school bullying: the moderating mediation of moral disengagement and only child status. Current Psychology, 43(22), 19617–19627. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yu, S., & Bikar, S. S. (2023). Preventing school bullying: Examining the association between classroom management, classroom climate, and relational aggression and victimisation. International Journal of Education and Practice, 11(2), 232–243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Empowering SME Performance Through Social Media: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Malaysian Manufacturing SMEs
• Impact of Workplace Conflict on the Operational Performance of Deposit Money Banks in Enugu State.
• Towards Digital Financial Solutions: A Conceptual Model of SME Strategies and Strategic Development
• Effect of Work-Life Balance and Affective Commitment on Employee Performance in the Hotel Industry in Plateau State
• Correlation Study on the Board Exam Performance of BS in Geodetic Engineering Graduates in NVSU