The Emerging Interests of the Paymaster in Malaysian Land Reference Proceedings: A Case Analysis
Authors
Faculty of Law, University Technology MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, University Technology MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Faculty of Law, University Technology MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-29
Accepted: 2025-10-04
Published: 2025-11-01
Abstract
Land acquisition in Malaysia has long been outlined as a balancing exercise between public interest and private rights of landowners, with compensation serving as the key instrument of fairness. Previous scholars have largely focused on this dual tension. However, recent judicial developments acknowledge the emergence of a third stakeholder which is the paymaster. Paymaster, often the concessionaires or acquiring bodies are those duty-bound in the development of an acquired land and financially responsible for the payment of compensation to the landowners. Although the paymaster holds no proprietary interest in the acquired land, Malaysian courts have recognized them as “person interested” within the ambit of the Land Acquisition Act 1960 (“LAA”). Recently, courts have also recognized their right to intervene in land reference proceedings, seek extensions of time to participate, object to the awards given by the Land Administrator (“LA”) and challenge procedural impropriety by the LA. This judicial recognition complicates the traditional framework of land acquisition by expanding a new layer of interest that must be balanced alongside those of the State and landowners. Relying on case law analysis, this paper argues that the recognition of the paymaster’s interest marks a significant shift in Malaysian land acquisition law, raising urgent questions of fairness, accountability and the proper scope of paymaster’s rights to be embedded or expressly excluded in the LAA. The study reveals that the judicial recognition accorded to paymaster has allowed them to actively pursue every available procedural avenue under the LAA, often with the underlying aim of reducing the compensation to the detriment of landowners. By highlighting these issues, the paper contributes to the limited research on paymasters’ interests and lays the foundation for future reform-oriented research in the Malaysian land acquisition law.
Keywords
Land Acquisition Act 1960, paymaster, land reference proceedings, compensation
Downloads
References
1. Alias, A., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., & Daud, N. (2010). Traditional lands acquisition and compensation: The perceptions of the affected Aborigin in Malaysia. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 5(11), 1696–1705. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS.9000601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alias, A., & Daud, M. D. N. (2009). Developing a compensation framework for the acquisition of Orang Asli native lands in Malaysia: The professionals’ perceptions. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2009.11104271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Botchwey, G. (2021). Compensation for lands compulsorily acquired by the state: Issues of non-completion of acquisition, non-payment of compensation and potential unjust enrichment. UCC Law Journal, 1(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.47963/ucclj.v1i2.418 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Callies, D. L., et al. (2002). Taking Land: Compulsory Purchase and Regulation in Asian Pacific Countries. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ghimire, S., Tuladhar, A., & Sharma, S. R. (2017). Governance in land acquisition and compensation for infrastructure development. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJCE.20170503.17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Hamid, N. ‘A., & Harun, N. (2011). Pengambilan tanah bagi pembangunan economy: Isu dan penyelesaian. Journal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, 15, 135–148. https://ejournals.ukm.my/juum/article/download/7509/3031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hamzah, J., Yusof, A. M., & Johari, N. A. (2013). Development process and its implication on the native land ownership. Asian Social Science, 9(14), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n14p18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Lee, J. T. (2015). We built this city: Public participation in land use decisions in Singapore. Asian Journal of Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1017/ASJCL.2015.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Olanrele, O., & Said, R. (2017). Towards global uniformity and sustainable compensation valuation for compulsory land acquisition. JUMMEC/Journal. https://jummec.um.edu.my/index.php/jdbe/article/download/10135/7181 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Omar, I. (2000). The influence of valuation rules on the supply of indigenous land in KL. Pacific Rim Real Estate Society (PRRES) Conference. http://www.prres.net/Papers/Omar_The_Influence_of_Valuation_Rules_On_the_Supply_of_Indigenous_Land_In_KL.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Salleh, N. A. M., & Peng, S. C. (2022). Striking the right balance between public and private interests in land acquisition: Conceptual framework and position in United States, Australia and Malaysia. IIUM [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Law Journal, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v30i1.710 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Salleh, N. A. M., & Sik, C. P. (2024). Empirical study of land acquisition in Peninsular Malaysia: Achieving equilibrium on competing public and private interests. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 15(2), 445–481. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.2.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Yoshino, N., Paul, S., Sarma, V., & Lakhia, S. (2018). Land acquisition and infrastructure development through land trust laws: A policy framework for Asia. ADB Institute Working Paper. https://www.adb.org/publications/land-acquisition-and-infrastructure%20development-through-land-trust-laws [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hassan. H. (2025, September 28). Bitter Malaysian land row raises questions over PM Anwar’s urban renewal plan. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/bitter-malaysian-land-row-raises-questions-over-pm-anwars-urban-renewal-plan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
- Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
- The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
- An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
- The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.