“All Mums Are Working Mums?” Discursive Constructions of Career-Oriented ‘Good Mother’ Identities on Social Media among Malaysian Mothers
Authors
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Kampus Dengkil, 43800 Dengkil, Selangor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.924ILEIID00100
Subject Category: Computer Science
Volume/Issue: 9/24 | Page No: 899-914
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-23
Accepted: 2025-09-30
Published: 2025-11-01
Abstract
This study explores how new Malaysian mothers discursively construct and negotiate their multiple identities on social media in relation to their careers. This qualitative study draws on Baxter’s (2007) Feminist Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis, Bucholtz and Hall’s (2005) sociocultural linguistic principles of identity construction, and Schippers’ (2007) concept of hegemonic femininities as its theoretical and analytical framework. The study is based on a comparative dataset comprising: (1) six months of private motherhood-related Facebook and Instagram posts from 2016, and (2) three months of public motherhood-related posts on Instagram Stories, TikTok, and Threads from 2025. The 2016 dataset includes nineteen Malaysian mothers: five working mothers (WM), seven work-at-home mothers (WAHM), and five stay-at-home mothers (SAHM). Meanwhile, the 2025 dataset comprises six Malaysian mothers (two WMs, two WAHMs, and two SAHMs) from diverse demographic backgrounds. Findings show that the selected mothers construct ambivalent identities on social media as they negotiate multiple, intersecting discourses often tied to ideals of the ‘good’ mother. Their varied accounts of ‘good’ mothering reveal identity struggles in which they orient to sometimes conflicting sociocultural expectations of ‘good’ motherhood in Malaysia, particularly those related to career decisions. The 2025 data, however, are characterised by more nuanced self-disclosures enabled by newer multimodal features of social media platforms. This study contributes to a deeper theoretical understanding of the complexities of discursive identity construction in mediated contexts. Tracing these Malaysian mothers’ discursive practices across spheres and time unpacks how sociocultural and digital developments reinforce and challenge dominant discourses of ‘good’ motherhood and career decisions in a multicultural society.
Keywords
Discursive identity construction, motherhood
Downloads
References
1. Abrams, K., & Curran, L. (2010). Motherhood and contemporary culture: The meanings of motherhood in relationship to identity. Journal of Family Issues, 31(4), 474–490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ainuddin, N., & Jegak, U. (2023). Gender, work and family in Malaysia: Trends, tensions and transformations. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 29(2), 139-154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Angouri, J. (2015). Discourse, identity and the digital self. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Austin, E. J., & Carpenter, L. (2008). Expectations and realities of motherhood. Parenting: Science and Practice, 8(4), 317–334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ball, M. J. (2010). Diversity and socioeconomics in sociolinguistics. In The Routledge handbook of sociolinguistics around the world (pp. 95–110). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Baxter, J. (2007). Positioning gender in discourse: A feminist poststructuralist approach. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Berger, M. (2022). The sociocultural shaping of mothers’ doing, being, becoming, and belonging: Western employed professional women. Gender, Work & Organization, 30(2), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1845226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bhopal, K. (1998). South Asian women and arranged marriages in Britain: Adjustments and negotiations within new social contexts. British Journal of Sociology, 49(1), 12–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Brookes, G., Harvey, K., & Robson, J. (2017). ‘People like me don’t buy medical stuff online’: Trust, risk and online health information. Internet Research, 27(5), 1158–1180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Choi, P., Henshaw, C., Baker, S., & Tree, J. (2005). Supermum, superwife, supereverything: Performing femininity in the transition to motherhood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 23(2), 167–180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D., & Bamberg, M. (2006). Discourse and identity. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. DeCesare, J. (2016). Digital mothering in contemporary societies. Journal of Digital Culture, 5(1), 80-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2018). Statistics on Women Empowerment in Selected Domains, Malaysia, 2018 (Publication No. 2018/02/12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Duberley, J., & Carrigan, M. (2012). The career identities of ‘mumpreneurs’: Women’s experiences of combining enterprise and motherhood. International Small Business Journal, 31(6), 629–651. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ekinsmyth, C. (2011). Challenging the boundaries of entrepreneurship: The spatialities and practices of ‘mumpreneurship’ in the UK. Geoforum, 42(1), 104–114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Goodwin, S., & Huppatz, K. (2010). The good mother: Contemporary motherhoods in Australia. Sydney University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Halim, R. A., Ahmad, N. F., & Salleh, N. A. (2016). Marriage, motherhood and labour force participation among Malaysian women. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 24(1), 21–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Harris, R., Samuel, A., & Wong, P. (2024). Gender and work-family balance among Malaysian urban professionals. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 55(3), 310–329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Ho, S. (2024). The motherhood wage gap in Malaysia: Trends and policy responses. Malaysian Economic Review, 39(2), 91–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. IKIM. (2025). Contemporary discourses on motherhood in Islam. IKIM Journal of Social Policy, 18(1), 22–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Irwan Nadzif, M. N., & Nor Azaian, A. (2011). Work-life balance and the Malaysian mother: A sociolinguistic perspective. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences, 27(2), 71-85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Irwan Nadzif, M. N., & Tang, C. (2017). Mothers, careers and cultural expectations in Malaysia: A discourse analysis. Sociolinguistic Studies, 11(2), 205-220. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2005). On qualitative inquiry: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Kaufmann, V., & Buckner, C. (2014). Digital platforms, maternal identity, and cultural negotiation. New Media & Society, 16(4), 564–581. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Kemp, S. (2018). Digital in Malaysia. We Are Social & Hootsuite Global Digital Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. McMahon, M. (1995). Engendering motherhood: Identity and self-Transformation in women's lives. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Mohd Noor, N., Lim, P. K., & Lee, S. R. (2024). Motherhood and digital entrepreneurship in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Communication Studies, 44(1), 151–171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Norazrin Zamri (2019). Discursive constructions of career-oriented ‘good mother’ identities on social media among new Malaysian mothers [Doctoral thesis, University of Warwick]. Warwick Research Archive Portal. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/145629/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Othman, A. N., & Mohamed, S. (2024). Exploring Instagram advocacy for citizenship rights of children born to Malaysian mothers overseas. In KAMC2024 Conference Proceedings (pp. 443–459). https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2436-0503.2024.39 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Plantin, L., & Daneback, K. (2009). Parenthood, information, and support on the internet: A literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(6), 521–533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Salleh, S. N. S., & Mansor, N. (2022). Women and labour force participation in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(7), e001641. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i7.1641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity and gender hegemony. Theory and Society, 36(1), 85–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Statista. (2024). Share of women in Malaysia’s labor force, by age group. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/642884/employment-rate-malaysia-by-gender/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Smyth, L. (2012). The demands of motherhood: Agents, roles and recognition. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered discourses. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Tan, C. (2017). The relevance of national principles in Malaysian society. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 13(1), 41–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Tan, S., Ahmad, R., & Wong, F. (2015). Malaysian cultural norms and family values: Impacts on gender roles. Malaysian Journal of Culture and Society, 19(2), 199–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Walz, J. (2018). Digital storytelling and the construction of self: A narrative inquiry. Narrative Inquiry, 28(1), 50–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Wall, G. (2013). Mothers’ experiences of intensive mothering. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Weaver, J., & Ussher, J. M. (1997). How motherhood changes life—a discourse analytic study with mothers of young children. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 15(1), 51–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Werbner, P. (2010). The limits of cultural hybridity: On ritual monsters, poetic licence and contested postcolonial purifications. Identities, 17(2-3), 1–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Yoong, L. L. (2022). Religion, culture and maternal self-conception among Malaysian women. Asian Women, 38(1), 81–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
- Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
- Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
- Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
- Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet