A Preliminary Analysis on Information Needs and Seeking Behaviour of Lawyers Using Exploratory Factor Analysis

This preliminary study was carried out to empirically examine the possible factors of legal information needs and information seeking behaviour among lawyers. The main aim is to investigate the measures impacting their effectiveness of information seeking behaviour by employing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). This user study opted a survey of 182 lawyers who work in Klang Valley area in Malaysia. Findings from EFA confirmed that five-factor solution can be used for further research as a measure of effectiveness of information seeking behavior of lawyers. The statistical adequacy of the EFA is supported by a good KMO (0.773 (2 =1959.88, p < 0.001).), Bartlett and acceptable internal consistency reliability of Cronbach alpha coefficients (all > 0.600). In addition, the total explained variance of the five components was 61.26% and with acceptable internal consistency reliability of Cronbach alpha coefficients (all > 0.600). The five components are significantly positive correlated with the effectiveness of information seeking behaviour. Thus, preliminary outcomes of this research suggested that effectiveness of information seeking behaviour of lawyers is significantly connected to the type of information needed, reasons for information seeking, sources in obtaining information, seeking strategies, and challenges in information seeking.

Information seeking behaviour, legal information, lawyers, exploratory factor analysis

1. Abubakar. (2010). A Snapshot of information-seeking behavior literature in health sciences: A bibliometric approach. Library Philosophy and Practice (ejournal). p.368. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aforo &, A. K., & Lamptey, R. B. (2012). Information Needs and Information Seeking Behaviour of Law Lecturers in Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. International Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 1(4), pp.75–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anmol, R., Khan, G. & Muhammad, I. (2021). Information Needs and Seeking Behavior: A Pakistani Perspective. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), p.5945. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Black, H. C. & Garner, B.A. H. (2004). Black’s Law Dictionary. 8th ed. Thomson/West Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bronstein, J. & Solomon , Y. (2021). Exploring the information practices of lawyers. Journal of Documentation, 77 (4): pp.1003–1021. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2020-0165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cohen, M. L. (1969). Research habits of lawyers. Jurimetrics Journal, 9, pp.183 -194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ellis, S., Makri, S. & Attfield, S. (2014). Keeping up with the Law: Investigating Lawyers’ Monitoring Behaviour, New Library World, 115(7/8): 292-313, doi: 10.1108/nlw03-2014 0023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Esew, M., Makarfi, A., Goshie, R. W., & Jimada, A. (2014). An Overview of Users Information Seeking Behaviour on Online Resources. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 19(1), pp.9–17. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-19190917. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Feliciano, M. (1984). Legal Information sources, services and needs of lawyers. Journal of Philippine Librarianship, 8(12), pp.71-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fowler, S.G. (2007). Results of participant observation in the Fifth Judicial District: Customizing the county law library to meet the needs of small firm attorneys in rural Kansas. EBLIP4, May 6-9, http://www.eblip4.unc.edu/papers/Fowler.pdf . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Golino, H. F., Shi, D., Christensen, A. P., Garrido, L. E., Nieto, M. D., Sadana, R., Martinez-Molina, A. (2020). Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: A simulation and tutorial. Psychological Methods, 25 (3), pp.292–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Goretzko, D. (2022). Factor retention in exploratory factor analysis with missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 82 (3), pp.444–464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Goretzko, D., & Bühner, M. (2020). One model to rule them all? Using machine learning algorithms to determine the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 25 (6), pp.776–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Goretzko, D., Pham, T. T. H., & Bühner, M. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Current Psychology, 40(7), pp.3510–3521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00300 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hinson, R., Ofori, D., & Atugura, R. (2007). The internet and lawyers in Ghana. Library Review, 56(4), pp.311-322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Howard, M. C. (2023). A systematic literature review of exploratory factor analyses in management. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113969 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Howard, M. C., & Henderson, J. (2023). A review of exploratory factor analysis in tourism and hospitality research: Identifying current practices and avenues for improvement. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113328 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Howard, M.C. & O'Sullivan, R. (2024). A systematic review of exploratory factor analysis in marketing: providing recommended guidelines and evaluating current practices. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, http://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2024.2395720 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ikoja-Odongo, R. & Mostert, J. (2006). Information seeking behavior: A conceptual framework. South African Journal of Library and Information Science, 72(3), pp.145 – 158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ikoja-Odongo, R. & Ochalla, D. N. (2004). Information seeking behaviour of formal sector entrepreneurs: The Uganda experience. Libri, 54, pp.54-66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jamshed, J. (2020). A Systematic Review of Information Seeking Behavior & Information Needs in Female Lawyers. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 4571. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4571 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jamshed, J., Naeem, S. B., & Bhatti, R. (2020). Lawyers' Usage Patterns of District Bar Law Library of Multan. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal, 51(1), p.52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Khan, S. A., Bhatti, R., & Khan, G. (2011). Information-Seeking Behavior of Law Practitioners: A Survey of Bahawalpur City. Library Philosophy and Practice, 581. Retrieved from http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/khan-bhatti.htm%5Cnhttp://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/lppissueindex.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kidd, D. (1978). Legal information of solicitors in private practice. Unpublished MSc Thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kidd, David H. (1981). Scottish solicitors' use of legal information, their legal information needs and legal problem solving routines. In: William Twinning (ed). Law publishing and legal information. London: Sweet & Maxwell, pp.26-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Komlodi, A. & Soergel, D. (2002). Attorneys interacting with legal information systems: Toolsfor mental model building and task integration. In proceedings of the 65th Annual Meeting of American Society for Information Science and Technology, pp.152-163. Philadelphia, USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Komlodi, A. (2004). Task management support in information seeking: a case for search histories, Computers in Human Behavior, 20, pp/163–184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the Search Process – Information Seeking from the User’s Perspective. Journal of The American Society for Information Science, 42(5), pp. 361–371. https://ils.unc.edu/courses/2014_fall/inls151_003/Readings/Kuhlthau_Inside_Search_Process_1991.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kumar, R. (2017). Information seeking behavior of academic lawyers of Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak , Haryana : A study, 2(V), pp.2–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Leckie, G. J., Pettigrew, K. E. & Sylvain, C. (1996). Modelling the information-seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Library Quarterly, 66(2),pp.161-193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ledesma, R., Ferrando, P., Trógolo, M., Poó, F., Tosi, J., & Castro, C. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis in transportation research: Current practices and recommendations. Transportation Research Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 78,pp.340-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.02.021 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Liang, C. (2013). What stimulates web design students’ imagination? The mediator effect of inspiration through action. Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, 50(3), pp.2013–2014. https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.2013.503/0494.RS.CM . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Makri, S. (2008). A study of lawyers’ information behaviour leading to the development of two methods for evaluating electronic resources. PhD Thesis . https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/1683487.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Makri, S., Blandford, A., & Cox, A. L. (2008). Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers: From Ellis’s model to design. Information Processing and Management, 44(2), 613–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Marsh, H.W.; Guo, J.; Dicke, T.; Parker, P.D.; Craven, R.G. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and set-ESEM: Optimal balance between goodness of fit and parsimony. Multivar. Behav. Res., 55, pp.102–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. McClelland, R. (2009). Why we skip rope: The neurobiology of social play. Paper presented to a conference on Joint Attention, Bentley University, Waltham, Massachusetts, October 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mohd Razilan, A.K., Tuan Saafat, T.A., Ahmad Zam Hariro, S. & Ahmad Nazri, M. (2024). Information Needs and Seeking Behaviour of Lawyers in Klang Valley, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(10), pp.2973-2989. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Nkomo, N., Ocholla, D., & Jacobs, D. (2011). Web information seeking behaviour of students and staff in rural and urban based universities in South Africa. Libri, 61, pp.281-297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Olorunfemi, D. Y. (2009). Family work conflict, information use, and social competence of themarried postgraduate students in the Faculty of Education, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Olorunfemi, D. Y., & Mostert, J. (2011). Information seeking behaviour of law students in a developing country : A, 1–20. Retrieved from http://www.lis.uzulu.ac.za/research/2012/Yemisi and MostertSCECSAL, U Z, 7.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Opeke, P. & Roseline, O. (2013). Information Needs and Seeking Behaviour of Senior Non- Academic Staff In Nigerian Universities, 7(6), pp.1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Otike, J. (1997). Legal information needs of the general public. Library Review, 46(1), pp. 28-33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Otike, J. (2000). Legal information needs of lawyers in Kenya: A case study. Journal of Library Management, 21(5), pp.241-252. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120010324842 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Otike, J., & Matthews, G. (2000). Legal information needs of lawyers in Kenya. Library Management, 21(5), pp.241–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Sanni, & Tunmibi. (2024). Information Retrieval Skills and Use of Online Legal Information Resources among Legal Practitioners in Ogun State, Nigeria. Lead City International Journal of Library, Information & Communication Sciences. July, 1(2), pp.300-319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Fifth Edition. Pearson Education Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Tuhumwire, I., & Okello-Obura, C. . (2010). Assessment of Legal Information Needs and Access Problems of Lawyers in Uganda. Library Philosophy & Practice, (June), pp.1–12. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=llf&AN=56660181&site=ehost-live . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Yusuf, T.I. (2012). Information Needs, Sources and Information Seeking Behaviour of Women Artisans in Offa Metropolis. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1201 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.