Investigating the Effectiveness of Voluntary Repatriation, Third-Country Resettlement, and Local Integration as Durable Solutions for Refugeehood

The total number of refugees on a global scale remains a profoundly troubling reality. Conflicts, persecution, climate-related displacement, and fragile state systems continue to push millions into forced migration, leaving them in prolonged situations of uncertainty. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has highlighted three recognized durable solutions aimed at addressing refugeehood: voluntary repatriation, third-country resettlement, and local integration. The intent of these solutions is not only to provide instantaneous respite but also to preserve the dignity of the millions of forcefully displaced people. This paper aims to investigate the level of the effectiveness and overall durability of these solutions by employing the method of a critical literature review. Through the findings, there appears to be a considerable imbalance in the preference and attention given to each of these approaches. Often regarded as the most expedient and preferred solution, voluntary repatriation is considered to be a politically necessary and cost-effective option widely accepted and implemented by host states and, by extension, the international community. Despite this, the reality tells a different tale: repatriation is usually less feasible because of the propensity of countries of origin to be generally unsafe and precarious for refugees who originally fled for safety concerns. Third-country resettlement and local integration are also durable solutions, but they have received little attention and endorsement. Only a small fraction of refugees receives opportunities for resettlement, and integration is often impeded by the persistent problems of socio-political resistance and weak policies and implementation. This imbalance constitutes the premise of the intractable problem of refugeehood in recent times. This paper concluded by offering recommendations that centre on the imperativeness of re-evaluating the priorities of key players such as states, especially host countries, and international agencies. To draw closer to mitigating refugeehood, it is important to focus more on developing opportunities for resettlement and integration.

Refugee, refugeehood, UNHCR, voluntary repatriation

1. Davey, E., Borton, J., & Foley, M. (2013). A history of the humanitarian system Western origins and foundations. HPG Working Paper. Humanitarian Policy Group. https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/8439.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2022). Welcome to UNHCR’s Refugee Population Statistics Database. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chimni, B.S. (1999). From resettlement to involuntary repatriation: Towards a critical history of durable solutions to refugee problems. New Issues in Refugee Research. Working Paper No. 2. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4ff59a392.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bradley, M. (2014). Rethinking refugeehood: statelessness, repatriation, and refugee agency. Review of International Studies. 40(1), 101-123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210512000514. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Worster, W.T. (2012). The evolving definition of the refugee in contemporary international law. Berkeley Journal of International Law (BJIL). 30(1), 101-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1736547. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. McBrien, J.L. (2017). Refugees, asylum seekers, and other immigrants: Help for teachers with problematic definitions. Social Studies Research and Practice. 12(2), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-03-2017-0001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Pijnenburg, A. & Rijken, C. (2020). Moving beyond refugees and migrants: reconceptualising the rights of people on the move. Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies. 23(2), 273-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1854107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (n.d.). Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (1985). Voluntary Repatriation No. 40 (XXXVI) – 1985. Executive Committee of the High Commissioner’s Programme. https://www.unhcr.org/excom/exconc/3ae68c9518/voluntary-repatriation.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Omata, N. (2013). The complexity of refugees' return decision-making in a protracted exile: Beyond the home-coming model and durable solutions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 39(8), 1281-1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.778149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Webber, F. (2011). How voluntary are voluntary returns? Race & Class. 52(4), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396810396606. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (1996). Voluntary repatriation: International protection. Geneva: UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/uk/3bfe68d32.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (n.d.). Information on UNHCR Resettlement. https://shorturl.at/czeFh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gil-Bazo, M. (2015). The safe third country concept in international agreements on refugee protection assessing state practice. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 33(1), 42–77. https://www.unhcr.org/59c4be077.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ineli-Ciger, M. (2022). Is resettlement still a durable solution? An analysis in light of the proposal for a regulation establishing a union resettlement framework. European Journal of Migration and Law. 24, 27-55. https://brill.com/view/journals/emil/24/1/article-p27_2.xml?language=en. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Crisp, J. (2004). The local integration and local settlement of refugees: A conceptual and historical analysis. New Issues in Refugee Research. Working Paper No. 102, UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/407d3b762.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kanamugire, J.C. (2016). Local Integration as a durable solution for refugees in South Africa. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica. 12(3), 44-57. https://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/3682/3710. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Aksoy, C.G., Poutvaara, P., & Schikora, F. (2021). First time around: Local conditions and multi-dimensional integration of refugees. ifo Working Paper, No. 361, ifo Institute. Munich: Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/248559/1/1777534399.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jacobsen, K. (2001). The Forgotten Solution: Local Integration for Refugees in Developing Countries. UNHCR Policy Development and Evaluation Service, New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 45. https://www.refworld.org/docid/4ff569552.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hovil, L. & Maple, N. (2022). Local integration: A durable solution in need of restoration? Refugee Survey Quarterly. 41(2), 238–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdac008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Crisp, J. & Long, K. (2016). Safe and voluntary refugee repatriation: From principle to practice. Journal on Migration and Human Security. 4(3), 141-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241600400305. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zieck, M. (2004). Voluntary repatriation: Paradigm, pitfalls, progress. Refugee Survey Quarterly. 23(3), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/23.3.33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nura, G.K. (2017). Refugees’ perceptions of their voluntary repatriation and its potential impact on the host community: The case of Dadaab Camp in Kenya. Thesis. Sociology and Social Work. University of Nairobi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2010). 2009 Global Trends: Refugees, Asylum-seekers, Returnees, Internally Displaced and Stateless Persons. Division of Programme Support and Management: UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/4c11f0be9.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Henry, B., Ringler-Jayanthan, E., Dawn, B., Darling, I., & Wilson, M. (2019). Challenges in Refugee Resettlement: Policy and Psychosocial Factors. Social Justice Brief. Washington: National Association of Social Workers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346048861_Challenges_in_Refugee_Resettlement_Policy_and_Psychosocial_Factors. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Jakulevičienė, L. & Bileišis, M. (2016). EU refugee resettlement: Key challenges of expanding the practice into new member states. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics: A Journal of Vytautas Magnus University, 9(1). https://shorturl.at/ij581 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Olivia, Y., Nizmi, Y.E., Jamaan, A., Saeri, M., Iskandar, I., & Deanty, H.S. (2021). Considering local integration for refugees in Indonesia. Journal Hubungan Internasional. 9(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v9i2.10113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Fielden, A. (2008). Local integration: An under-reported solution to protracted refugee situations. New Issues in Refugee Research. 158, 1-21. Retrieved Feb. 8, 2023 from https://www.unhcr.org/486cc99f2.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ahimbisibwe, F., Ingelaere, B., & Vancluysen, S. (2017). Local Integration as a Durable Solution? The Case of Rwandan Refugees in Uganda. Discussion Paper/2017.02. University of Antwerp: Institute of Development Policy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321918304_Local_Integration_as_a_Durable_Solution_The_Case_of_Rwandan_Refugees_in_Uganda. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Low, A. (2006). Local integration: a durable solution for refugees? Forced Migration Review, 25, 64-65. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2023, from https://www.fmreview.org/peopletrafficking/low. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Gardi, R. (2021). The future of solutions. Reference Paper for the 70th Anniversary of the 1951 Refugee Convention. Retrieved Apr. 27, 2023 from https://www.unhcr.org/people-forced-to-flee-book/wp-content/uploads/sites/137/2021/10/Rez-Gardi_The-future-of-solutions.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wood, T. (2020). The role of ‘complementary pathways’ in refugee protection. Reference Paper for the 70th Anniversary of the 1951 Refugee Convention. Retrieved Apr. 27, 2023 from https://www.unhcr.org/people-forced-to-flee-book/wp-content/uploads/sites/137/2021/10/Tamara-Wood_The-role-of-complementary-pathways-in-refugee-protection.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Long, K. (2009). Extending protection? Labour migration and durable solutions for refugees. New Issues in Refugee Research. Research Paper No. 176. Retrieved Apr. 27, 2023 from https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4f719bcd2.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Solf, B. & Rehberg, K. (2021). The resettlement gap: A record number of global refugees, but few are resettled. News and Press Release. Relief Web. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2023 from https://reliefweb.int/report/world/resettlement-gap-record-number-global-refugees-few-are-resettled. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Bialczyk, A. (2008). ‘Voluntary Repatriation’ and the Case of Afghanistan: A Critical Examination. RSC Working Paper No. 46. Refugee Studies Centre: University of Oxford. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2023 from https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/wp46-voluntary-repatriation-case-afghanistan-2008.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Androff, D.K. (2022). Refugee Solutions in the Age of Global Crisis: Human Rights, Integration, and Sustainable Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Crisp, J. (2019). Repatriation principles under pressure. Forced Migration Review. 62, 19-23. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2023 from https://www.fmreview.org/return/crisp#_edn1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2017). Involuntary refugee returns to Nigeria must be avoided – UNHCR. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2023, from https://www.unhcr.org/news/press/2017/6/5954bedb4/involuntary-refugee-returns-nigeria-must-avoided-unhcr.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. The New Humanitarian. (2010). The road to third country resettlement for Iraqi refugees. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2023 from https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/feature/2010/03/01/road-third-country-resettlement-iraqi-refugees. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Khasalamwa-Mwandha, S. (2021). Local integration as a durable solution? Negotiating socioeconomic spaces between refugees and host communities in rural Northern Uganda. Sustainability. 13(19), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910831. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. World Economic Forum. (2018). We need to talk about integration after migration. Here are four ways we can improve it. https://shorturl.at/LHysX. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]