The Impact of Integrating Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks on the Performance of Strategic Planning Process at the University of Zambia

Authors

Busu Mpepo

Graduate School of Business: University of Zambia (Zambia)

Dr Jason Mwanza

Graduate School of Business: University of Zambia (Zambia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000027

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 316-328

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-24

Accepted: 2025-09-29

Published: 2025-11-03

Abstract

Descriptive and inferential statistics frequencies, percentages, and regression analysis were used to analyse the quantitative data, exploring relationships between M and E integration and strategic outcomes (Gichuhi and Nyagah, 2019). According to the report of the Committee of Cabinet Affairs on the Implementation of the National Monitoring and Evaluation Policy in Zambia (2023), the Government developed the National Monitoring and Evaluation Policy to provide a framework to measure and track progress in the implementation of policies, plans, programmes and projects. This arose due to the need for a robust national Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) framework to guide the National Development Plan implementation and provide mechanisms for objective assessment of programme results (outcomes and impacts) which needed the urgent and coordinated attention of all stakeholders (NAZ, 2023). However, the University of Zambia under the Ministry of Education (MoE) was not familiar with the content of the Policy and the implementation plan. The main purpose of this study was to assess the impact of Integrating Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks into the Strategic Planning Process at the University of Zambia. The specific objectives were to evaluate the role of effective integrating monitoring and evaluation frameworks into the strategic planning process at the University of Zambia, to evaluate the involvement of monitoring and evaluation frameworks into the strategic planning process at the University of Zambia., and to determine the impact of integrating monitoring and evaluation frameworks into the strategic planning process at the University of Zambia. The researcher adopted quantitative research designs. The study employed Purposive sampling techniques to mobilise the quantitative and qualitative data. The Purposive method was used to identify and select a homogenous sample of UNZA employees that met the predetermined criterion of importance. The research comprised of questionnaires. The questionnaires were used because they are the main means of collecting quantitative primary data. The questionnaires enabled quantitative data collected in a standardized manner, to ensure the data is consistency and coherent for the analysis. From the findings, the study concludes that the University of Zambia has made significant strides in implementing M&E structures, with 91% of respondents acknowledging the presence of dedicated M&E units. However, the effectiveness of these structures is perceived as lacking by a notable segment of the staff, with 69% of respondents rating the current M&E processes as ineffective or very ineffective. This finding is particularly concerning given that 70% of respondents indicated that M&E processes contribute positively to achieving strategic objectives. The disparity between perceptions of M&E processes and their actual effectiveness suggests a critical need for improvement in engagement practices and the overall M&E framework. The study reveals a significant gap in the allocation of human and financial resources for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) activities, with 60% of respondents indicating that such resources are insufficient. Only 25% believe that adequate resources are in place, while 15% remain uncertain. The study further reveals a notable 25% remain neutral, which may indicate uncertainty or a lack of involvement with the M&E processes. The data indicates a strong consensus on the necessity of mainstreaming a formal Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) framework in future initiatives. A significant majority, totaling 65%, either strongly agree (35%) or agree (30%) with the need for a formal M&E framework.

Keywords

Monitoring and Evaluation, Strategic Planning, UNZA, Determine

Downloads

References

1. Al-Nabae, M. &. S. D., 2021. Factors That Influencing Project Management Performance: a Review. International Journal of A. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,, 11(8), pp. 628-643. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amina, M. &. N. L., 2022. Effects of utilization of monitoring and evaluation results on Project Performance.. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(5), pp. 104-113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bertalanffy, L. v., 1968. General system theory: Foundation, development, application.. New York:: George Braziller. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chaplowe, S. G. &. C. J. B., 2016. Monitoring and evaluation training: A systematic approach.. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/78494516/ Monitoring_and_Evaluation_Training_A_Systematic_Approach: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chege, F. M. &. B. O., 2020. Monitoring and evaluation and Project Performance in Kenya: The case of non- governmental organizations implementing education projects in Nairobi county.. International Academic Journal of Information Sciences and Project Management, 3(6), pp. 312-3337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hauya, C., 2023. Monitoring and evaluation practices on performance of government agricultural affordable inputs program in Lilongwe District, Malawi. Diss., Lilongwe: Diss. Africa Nazarene University,. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jahaf, L. H., 2021. The effect of monitoring and evaluation practices on development projects’ performance in yemen and its relation to gender. Arab Journal for Scientific Publishing (AJSP). Arab Journal for Scientific Publishing (AJSP) . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kyalo, N. D. N. J. K. &. M. M. W., 2017. Learner Support Services and Quality ofEducation in Public Universities in Kenya.. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences ,. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Masilo, M. &. M. T., 2021. Monitoring and evaluation in the public sector: A case of the Department of Home Affairs (South Africa)., Pretoria: University of Pretoria.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mokua, M. A. &. M. M. A.-M., 2022. Results based monitoring and evaluation systems on performance of CDF funded projects in Nairobi county, Kenya.. Social Sciences & Open , Volume 3, pp. 287-296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Murei, C. K. H. &. G. C., 2017. Influence of monitoring and evaluation human resources capacity on performance of horticulture projects in Nakuru county, Kenya.. Journal of Science and Humanities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. NAZ, 2023. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON CABINET AFFAIRS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL MONITORING AND EVALUATION POLICY IN ZAMBIA, Lusaka: National Assembly of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Njoroge, J. W. &. M. A., 2023. Monitoring and evaluation data and Project. International Journal of Business Management Research, 7(2), pp. 61-80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nyirenda-Mutambo, E., 2018. Monitoring and Evaluation in the Education Sector. Monitoring and Evaluation Course Reader., Lusaka.. Retrieved from: https://www.acade mia.edu/41058055/Monitoring_and_Evaluation_M_and_E_in_the_Education_Sector: University of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Onjole, D., 2021. Influence of Monitoring and Evaluation Exercises on the Performance of Water Development Programs in Tharaka Nithi County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, , Nairobi: University of Nairobi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Press, U., 2022. The University of Zambia Strategic Plan 2023-2027, Lusaka: UNZA Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Shabbir, R. N. S. &. C. S. M., 2023. Evaluation of the Factors behind the Failure of Project Management Practices.. Journal of Development and Social Sciences,, 4(3), pp. 490-. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Simiyu, I. M. &. O. R. M., 2023. Monitoring and evaluation budget and performance of water and sanitation projects in Nakuru County, Kenya.. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, , 7(5), pp. 70-76. . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles