The ESG–AML Convergence Challenge: A New Financial Criminology Perspective for Malaysia

There is a growing intersection between AML and ESG, signalling a new phase in the criminology of finance. Although there is plenty of work on ESG and AML dimensions independently, little work is done in the overlapping space of the two in terms of risky activities and enforcement. Accordingly, this research proposes the ESG–AML Convergence Model as a novel theoretical instrument that facilitates an investigation into the assessment of how an advanced sustainability scene, like Malaysia’s forward-looking ESG landscape (including green finance and Islamic banking), may engender potential misuse cases of anti-money laundering. Using criminological theories like routine activity theory and convenience theory, the model shows how the perceived legitimacy of ESG initiatives can “conceal” AML risk. This helps fraudsters take advantage of greenwashing, due diligence and regulatory silos. One of the important findings, particularly concerning, is that there are systemic weaknesses in Malaysia’s financial system, manifested in ESG and AML compliance functions not being aligned; due-diligence processes are fragmented; and technology is limited in ensuring that transactions of an ESG type can be tracked. This conceptual paper provides specific actions based on government-wide governance, state-of-the-art analytics, and trans-regulatory coordination to better manage such risks in the future. Our contribution to the literature is twofold. This study will contribute to academic knowledge and provide tools for regulators, financial service providers and policymakers, by connecting the fields of financial criminology and sustainable finance policy, that further sustainability and financial integrity in developing countries.

ESG Compliance, Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Financial Criminology, Islamic Finance

1. Aguirre, J. C. (2024, June 4). The warring conmen at the heart of a €5bn carbon trading scam. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2024/jun/04/the-warring-conmen-at-the-heart-of-a-5bn-carbon-credit-scam [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Kubaisi, H. A. R. A., Husain, F., & Ali, M. (2024). Charities or donations as a source of terrorism financing: Why does regulation fail in Pakistan?* Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v3i3.89 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bank Negara Malaysia & Securities Commission Malaysia. (2025, January 27). Joint statement on the 14th Joint Committee on Climate Change (JC3) meeting. [Press release].Retrieved from Kuala Lumpur: BNM and SC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chairunnisa, R. S., Shabrina, L., Rahma, J., & Allam, Z. (2023). Tracking the money: The case of 1MDB scandal. Global Focus: Journal of International Studies, 3(1), 48–64. https://globalfocus.ub.ac.id/index.php/globalfocus/article/view/13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dobrowolski, Z., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2019). Implementing a sustainable model for anti-money laundering in the United Nations development goals. Sustainability, 12(1), 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. FATF. (2021). High-level synopsis of the stocktake of the unintended consequences of the FATF Standards. Paris: Financial Action Task Force. (Retrieved from FATF website) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ferri, C. (2024). New approaches to old problems? Rethinking the design of AML/CFT strategy. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2405.18517. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.18517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ferwerda, J., & Reuter, P. (2024). National assessments of money laundering risks: stumbling at the start. Risk Analysis, 44(9), 2001–2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13599 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gaviyau, W., & Sibindi, A. B. (2023). Global anti-money laundering and combating terrorism financing regulatory framework: A critique. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(7), 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16070313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gottschalk, P. (2017). The white-collar crime triangle: finance, organisation, and behaviour. Journal of Forensic Sciences & Criminal Investigation, 4(1), Article 555635. https://doi.org/10.19080/JFSCI.2017.04.555635 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Guo, J., Lin, O., Ye, K., Guan, J., & Lei, X. (2024). Research on regulatory strategies of green finance and optimisation of corporate green behaviour under the framework of circular economy. Global NEST Journal, 26(4), 531–543. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Győry, C. (2020). The institutional context of financial fraud in a post-transition economy: The Quaestor scandal. European Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370818812732 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hu, P., Li, X., Li, N., Wang, Y., & Wang, D. D. (2024). Peeking into corporate greenwashing through the readability of ESG disclosures. Sustainability, 16(6), Article 2571. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062571 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khan, M., & Sarker, T. (2022). Overview of international best practices on customer due diligence and related anti-money laundering measures. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-07-2022-0102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kroll. (2025). Fraud and financial crime report: The use and abuse of carbon credits. Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. https://www.kroll.com/en/reports/fraud-and-financial-crime-report/the-use-and-abuse-of-carbon-credits [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lin, K., Wu, Y., Sun, I. Y., & Qu, J. (2023). Telecommunication and cyber fraud victimisation among Chinese college students: An application of routine activity theory. Criminology and Criminal Justice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221146144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Liu, F. H., & Lai, K. P. (2021). Ecologies of green finance: Green sukuk and the development of green Islamic finance in Malaysia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(8), 1896–1914. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211029093 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lord, N., van Wingerde, K., & Campbell, L. (2018). Organising corporate financial crime funds via organizational structures: Ostensible legitimacy, effective anonymity, and third-party facilitation. Administrative Sciences, 8(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mustapha, Z., Kunhibava, S., Muneeza, A., Khalid, M., & Ming Sen, T. (2023). Social sukuk for sustainable development: A Review of Sukuk Prihatin, Ihsan Sukuk (Malaysia), and cash waqf-linked sukuk (Indonesia). I-IECONS Proceedings, 10(1), 940–953. https://doi.org/10.33102/iiecons.v10i1.115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ngo, N.-Q.-N., Pham, T.-H., Pham, H., & Truong, M. T. (2025). Green finance and anti-money laundering effectiveness: Evidence from Asian countries (SSRN Working Paper No. 5179815). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5179815 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Olawale, H. O., Isibor, N. J., & Fiemotongha, J. E. (2025). A unified compliance operations framework integrating AML, ESG, and transaction-monitoring standards. International Research Journal of Modernisation in Engineering Technology and Science, 7(5), 141–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pavlidis, G. (2023). The dark side of anti-money laundering: Mitigating the unintended consequences of FATF standards. Journal of Economic Criminology, 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Prakash, S. (2025). AI-driven cloud solutions for anti-money laundering (AML) compliance using graph neural networks and behavioural analytics. European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 13(48), 33–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ramadhan, S. (2024). Harnessing machine learning for money laundering detection: A criminological theory-centric approach. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 28(1), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-02-2023-0030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Razali, N., Hassan, R., & Zain, N. R. M. (2022). Exploring the regulatory framework of sustainable finance in Malaysia: Driving force for ESG institutional investors. IIUM Law Journal, 30(S1), 279–316. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v30i(Special%20Issue).743 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ruggiero, V. (2022). Sustainability and financial crimes. International Criminology, 2(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43576-022-00052-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Shahrom, Z., & Kunhibava, S. (2023). Sustainable finance: A study on Malaysia’s regulatory framework on sustainable banking and its implementation by selected Islamic banks in Malaysia to support sustainable development goals. Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 20(2), 152–178. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.v20i2.520 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Siregar, R. (2025). ESG and Islamic accounting for sustainable Islamic finance: A qualitative study. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 13(3), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v13i3.394 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Siu, J. C. L., Zhong, H., & Nivette, A. (2024). Exploring the impact of routine activities and financial strain on fraud victimisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Criminology, 19(3), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-023-09366-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sreeram D. (2024). Green finance and ESG investing: Aligning profits with sustainability. European Economic Letters, 15(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.52783/eel.v15i2.3229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sulaiman, N. N., Omar, A. J., Pakir, F., & Mohamad, M. (2024). Evaluating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices among Malaysian public listed construction companies using the FTSE Russell rating model. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 15(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2024.15.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Teichmann, F., Boticiu, S. R., & Sergi, B. S. (2024). Compliance risks for crowdfunding: A neglected aspect of money laundering, terrorist financing, and fraud. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(3), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2022-0204 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Yusoff, Y. H., Hadzlan, T. P., Nazli, S. S., Soid, S., Rahim, R. A., & Nor, N. M. (2023). Role of due diligence in combating money laundering through the lens of ESG: A concept. Accounting and Finance Research, 12(4), 1–72. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v12n4p1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zafeiriou, E., Garefalakis, A., Passas, I., & Ragazou, K. (2023). Illicit and corruption mitigation strategies in the financial sector: A study with a hybrid methodological approach. Sustainability, 15(2), 1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zakaria, M. R. A., Khan, M. B. A., Rahman, N. A., & Yusof, A. M. (2025). Jurisdictional overlap between the Malaysian Competition Commission and the Securities Commission in merger reviews. IIUM Law Journal, 33(1), 1–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors