A Proposed Framework to Enhance Management Accounting Practice in Schools Management

This conceptual paper develops a theoretically grounded framework to strengthen Management Accounting Practices (MAPs) in schools. Although management accounting is widely applied in the corporate sector, its adoption in educational settings remains limited, resulting in weak analytical decision-making, inadequate financial transparency, and inefficient budgeting. Drawing on Contingency Theory, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, and principles of public-sector accountability, this study conceptualises how contextual conditions shape the design and quality of Management Accounting Information (MAI), and how decision-making capability and financial innovation mediate the relationship between MAI and school performance. The proposed framework integrates budgeting cycles, cost measurement tools, reporting systems, and performance indicators to offer a more systematic and evidence-based approach to school financial governance. It also provides a foundation for future empirical validation through pilot studies, qualitative interviews, and quantitative modelling. By positioning MAPs as strategic enablers rather than administrative routines, the model offers practical guidance for school leaders and policymakers seeking to enhance transparency, resource optimisation, and data-driven decision-making in alignment with Malaysia’s education transformation agenda.

management accounting practices, decision-making capability, financial innovation

1. American Accounting Association (AAA). (2022). Managerial accounting for decision-making and planning. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 34(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anas, M. (2024). Financial management audits to improve school quality. Journal of Educational Management and Leadership, 6(2), 45–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aziz, N. A., & Said, J. (2022). Integrating management accounting practices and balanced scorecard for improved school performance in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 37(4), 58–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bhimani, A. (2020). Digital accounting: The effects of the internet and ERP on management accounting systems. Accounting and Business Research, 50(6–7), 534–548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bhimani, A., & Willcocks, L. (2014). Digitisation, “Big Data” and the transformation of accounting information. Accounting and Business Research, 44(4), 469–490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bouwens, J., & Abernethy, M. A. (2000). The consequences of customization on management accounting system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(3), 221–241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Broadbent, J., Jacobs, K., & Laughlin, R. (2020). Organisational accountability in public services: The contribution of institutional theory. Financial Accountability & Management, 36(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J. (2008). Public sector to public services: 20 years of contextual accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(2), 129–169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Caldwell, B. J. (2021). School financial management and strategic leadership: Emerging trends in educational accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2020-0011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. The Accounting Review, 61(1), 16–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chong, V. K. (1996). Management accounting systems, task uncertainty, and managerial performance: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(5), 415–421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chong, V. K., & Eggleton, I. R. C. (2003). The decision-facilitating role of management accounting systems on managerial performance. Advances in Accounting, 20, 165–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dahal, R. K. (2024). Management accounting’s role in decision-making and organisational efficacy. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2433165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Day, C., & Smethem, L. (2023). Budgeting, resourcing, and school performance: The growing role of financial leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 235–252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Drury, C. (2018). Management and cost accounting (10th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Grossi, G., Reichard, C., & Ruggiero, P. (2022). Public sector accounting and performance measurement in nonprofit organizations: A systematic review. Public Money & Management, 42(6), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1890909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gul, F. A., & Chia, Y. M. (1994). The effects of management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(4–5), 413–426. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hall, M. (2011). Do comprehensive performance measurement systems help or hinder managers’ mental model development? Management Accounting Research, 22(2), 68–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hood, C. (1995). The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 33–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hyndman, N., & McKillop, D. (2019). Accounting and accountability in nonprofit organizations: A review of the literature. Financial Accountability & Management, 35(2), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12182 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Institut Aminuddin Baki (IAB). (n.d.). Kajian keberkesanan Kursus Pengurusan Kewangan Sekolah (KPKEWS). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Jalal, S. (2022). The role of management accounting in the decision-making process. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 12(2), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Karanja, P. N., & Nzulwa, J. D. (2020). Influence of financial innovation on performance of public secondary schools in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(9), 101–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kenayathulla, H. B., Raman, A., & Aziz, N. A. (2017). Pengurusan kewangan di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil, Kuala Kangsar. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 42(1), 23–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Maslufi, L. Z. (2025). Transparency and accountability in school financial management. Indonesian Journal of Educational Finance, 4(1), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mavragani, A., Nikolaou, I. E., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2016). The role of school performance evaluation frameworks in educational quality improvement. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 221–236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mia, L., & Chenhall, R. H. (1994). The usefulness of management accounting systems, functional differentiation, and managerial effectiveness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mokhtar, N., & Jusoh, R. (2017). The effect of management accounting practices on performance in Malaysian educational institutions. International Journal of Accounting and Business Management, 5(2), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nguyen, T. M. (2021). Applying the balanced scorecard in Vietnamese high schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(5), 1021–1038. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nielsen, L. B. (2015). Management accounting and decision-making: Two case studies. Accounting Education, 24(3), 208–232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Otley, D. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014. Management Accounting Research, 31, 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Pang, V. (2019). Balanced scorecard adoption and school management effectiveness. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(3), 437–451. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Radzi, N. M. (2016). Strategic financial planning in Malaysia’s national schools. Malaysian Journal of Education Management, 4(2), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Radzi, N. M., Ghani, M. F. A., & Siraj, S. (2013). Financial decentralization in Malaysian schools. Asian Education Studies, 1(2), 88–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Radzi, N. M., Ghani, M. F. A., & Siraj, S. (2015). Development of an effective school-based financial management profile. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 803–810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Radzi, N. M., Ghani, M. F. A., & Siraj, S. (2017). Design of an effective school-based financial management model in Malaysia. International Journal of Education Development, 53, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Rint, R. M. (2024). Challenges in school-based management: Administrators’ perspectives. Asian Journal of Educational Administration, 12(1), 66–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Scapens, R. W., & Jazayeri, M. (2003). ERP systems and management accounting change. European Accounting Review, 12(1), 201–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Trevisan, P. (2023). Management accounting and decision-making in a creative organisation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 89, 102505. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Wongkhiaw, A. (2025). Effective financial and accounting management of secondary schools in Thailand. Journal of Educational Finance and Administration, 8(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study