A Structural Model of Participation in Innovation and Design Competitions among Malaysian University Students

In Malaysian higher education, outside academic programs such as innovation and design competitions are increasingly recognised as vital pathways for student development, professional readiness, and industry engagement. However, student participation in these initiatives remains inconsistent, prompting questions about what drives behavioural intention in this voluntary academic context. This study proposes and tests an extended UTAUT-based model, integrating constructs from educational psychology—namely Motivation and Self-Efficacy—to explore how cognitive, motivational, social, and structural factors influence students’ attitudes and intentions. Using data from 502 undergraduate students in public universities and analysed through Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), the results demonstrate that Self-Efficacy, Performance Expectancy, Social Influence, and Facilitating Conditions significantly predict Motivation, which in turn influences Attitude and Behavioural Intention. Attitude emerges as the most powerful predictor of intention, while Motivation acts as a mediating force connecting internal beliefs to evaluative judgments. Facilitating Conditions and Performance Expectancy also directly affect intention, underscoring the role of institutional support and perceived utility. The study offers a nuanced theoretical model and practical recommendations for universities aiming to increase engagement in extracurricular academic programs. By reframing Motivation as both an outcome and a strategic lever, the research contributes to a more holistic understanding of student participation behaviour.

Student Engagement; Motivation; UTAUT

1. O. Farrell, “From Portafoglio to Eportfolio: The Evolution of Portfolio in Higher Education,” Journal of Interactive Media in Education, vol. 2020, no. 1, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.5334/jime.574. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Kamal Ghalandari, “The Effect of Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence and Facilitating Conditions on Acceptance of E-Banking Services in Iran: the Moderating Role of Age and Gender,” Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 801–807, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Kiran Mayi Immaneni and Dr. Vedala Naga Sailaja, “A STUDY ON FACTORS EFFECTING THE EMPLOYEES ATTRITION IN HOTEL INDUSTRY WITH REFERENCE HYDERABAD,” International Journal of Management (IJM), vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 170–176, Dec. 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. P. Tang, G. Pavlopoulou, K. Kostyrka-Allchorne, J. Phillips-Owen, and E. Sonuga-Barke, “Links between mental health problems and future thinking from the perspective of adolescents with experience of depression and anxiety: a qualitative study,” Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 143, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00679-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. M. S. Asobee, “An Investigation on the Role of Coaching in Strategic Leadership Development in the Academia,” Open Journal of Leadership, vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 47–59, 2021, doi: 10.4236/ojl.2021.102004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci, “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being,” vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78, Jan. 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. D. Bandhu, M. M. Mohan, N. A. P. Nittala, P. Jadhav, A. Bhadauria, and K. K. Saxena, “Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers,” Acta Psychol (Amst), vol. 244, p. 104177, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. P. Gilbert and S. Procter, “Compassionate mind training for people with high shame and self‐criticism: overview and pilot study of a group therapy approach,” Clin Psychol Psychother, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 353–379, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1002/cpp.507. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. A. Wigfield, K. Muenks, and J. S. Eccles, “Achievement Motivation: What We Know and Where We Are Going,” Annu Rev Dev Psychol, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 87–111, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050720-103500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy.,” in Encyclopedia of psychology, Vol. 7., New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 212–213. doi: 10.1037/10522-094. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. U. Muti’ah, St. B. Waluya, and M. Mulyono, “Creative Thinking Skills based on Self-efficacy in Creative Problem Solving Learning with Scaffolding,” IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), vol. 5, no. 2, p. 169, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.31764/ijeca.v5i2.10100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. B. J. Zimmerman, “Attaining Self-Regulation,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, Elsevier, 2000, pp. 13–39. doi: 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, Dec. 1991, doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. H. K. Xin, N. J. Ping, L. X. Tong, K. M. Yan, and N. Abdul Razak, “The Impact of Student Attitude on Information, Communication, Creation Skills and Student Engagement,” Information Management and Business Review, vol. 16, no. 3S(I)a, pp. 525–538, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.22610/imbr.v16i3S(I)a.4149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar