A Study of Learner-Initiated Engagement in Informal English Language Learning
Authors
Pusat Pengajian Citra University Kebangsaan (Malaysia)
Pusat Pengajian Citra University Kebangsaan (Malaysia)
Pusat Pengajian Citra University Kebangsaan (Malaysia)
Pusat Pengajian Citra University Kebangsaan (Malaysia)
Pusat Pengajian Citra University Kebangsaan (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000582
Subject Category: Language
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 7148-7159
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-25
Accepted: 2025-10-30
Published: 2025-11-18
Abstract
This preliminary study aims to determine the level of exposure to English beyond the classroom among ESL learners. A total of 117 learners from various faculties at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) participated in this survey. The survey was designed to gather detailed insights into the learners' exposure to learning English outside of classroom hours, focusing on the four essential language skills: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. The survey collected demographic information and assessed learners' informal English activities. A series of questionnaires were used to collect data on the frequency, context, and intensity with which the learners used English. The results show that the learners gained exposure to all four language skills. Findings suggest consistent and varied exposure to informal English activities in different contexts is crucial for learners to reinforce and improve their language skills, resulting in enhanced language acquisition. By analysing responses to these questions, researchers can gain valuable insights into learners’ exposure to these informal English activities and their impact on language proficiency.
Keywords
Exposure; informal; skills; acquisition
Downloads
References
1. Al-Ghazali, F. (2021). Utilizing social networking sites for reinforcing the linguistic competence of EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1124-1140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Al-Zoubi, S. M. (2018). The Impact of Exposure to English Language on Language Acquisition. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(4), 151–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Anderson, R. C., & Nagy, W. E. (1991). Word meanings. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 690–724). Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ardianto, P., Pramesti, E. D., Paradita, L. I., & Purwanto, M. B. (2025). “I played video games and I picked up the language”: Exploring L2 acquisition through extensive listening/viewing. INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 12(1), 86–100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Azzolini, D., Campregher, S., & Madia, J. E. (2020). Formal instruction vs informal exposure: What matters more for teenagers’ acquisition of English as a second language? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Research Papers in Education, 1-29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Benson, P., & Reinders, H. (2011). Beyond the language classroom. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Boyask, R., Wall, C., Harrington, C., & Milne, J. (2021). Reading for pleasure for the collective good of Aotearoa New Zealand. National Library of New Zealand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bulut, M., Bulut, A., Kaban, A., & Kirbas, A. (2024). Exploring the Nexus of Technology, Digital, and Visual Literacy: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(2), 345-363. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Chen, Y., & Tsai, C. (2022). Instagram feed-based tasks on learning grammar and attitude among EFL learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1012004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2020b). Learning English through out-of school exposure. Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 171-185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ellis, N. C., & Laporte, N. (1997). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on second language acquisition. In A. M. B. de Groot and J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 53-83). Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Using mobile technology to develop language skills and cultural understanding. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 3–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2015). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 141-168). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Gilmore, A. (2011). “I prefer not text”: Developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning, 61(3), 786–819. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Lee, J. S. (2019). Informal digital learning of English and second language vocabulary outcomes: Can quantity conquer quality? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 736–759. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lee, J. S., & Dressman, M. (2018). When IDLE hands make an English workshop: Informal digital learning of English and language proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 435–445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Mohd Tap, M. F., Abdul Samat, N., & Abdullah, T. (2024). Exploring the potential of video games in enhancing language learning. LSP International Journal, 11(1), 29–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2021). Language curriculum design (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Rahmawati, F., Pasandalan, S. N., & Novitasari, H. (2024). An analysis of YouTube as sustainable educational resources for EFL learners. E3S Web of Conferences 594, 05003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Reinders, H., & Benson, P. (2017). Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. Language Teaching, 50(4), 561–578. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Snigdha, S. S., & Debnath, A. (2024). Influence of video games on children’s English language learning: A case of Bangladesh. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Squire, K. D. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming, 2(1), 49–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. StudySmarter. (2023). Language exposure: Importance & techniques [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Supramaniam, K., & Wan Shahirah. (2022). Second language acquisition opportunities during digital game interactions. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(4), 961–974. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2012). Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. ReCALL, 24(3), 302-321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2016). Extramural English in teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Sundqvist, P. (2024). Extramural English as an individual difference variable in L2 research: Methodology matters. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 44, 27-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Thorne, S. L. (2008). Language and literacy development in computer-mediated contexts and communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 133-160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K., Lynch, J. S., Butler, J., White, M. J., & Lorch, E. P. (2006). Assessment of comprehension abilities in young children. In S. Stahl & M. McKenna (Eds.), Reading research at work: Foundations of effective practice (pp. 107–130). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Wagner, E. (2014). Using unscripted spoken texts in listening comprehension tests: Issues for test development and research. Language Testing, 31(2), 163–180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Yuyun, I., & Simamora, F. Y. (2021). The use of YouTube to support EFL students’ listening skills. ELLTER Journal, 2(2), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Zhang, X., & Lee, J. (2023). Scaffolding digital tool use for autonomous English learning in higher education. TESOL Quarterly, 58(1), 87-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Zulaefa, R., & Rizal, D. (2023). The use of YouTube as a supplementary resource in students’ speaking skills. Journal of English Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
- Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
- Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
- Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
- Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests