A Systematic Literature Review on Differentiated Instruction Practices in English Classrooms (2020–2025)
Authors
Academy of Language Studies, University Technology MARA, Cawangan Terengganu, Kampus Dungun, Terengganu, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, University Technology MARA, Cawangan Terengganu, Kampus Dungun, Terengganu, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000710
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 8719-8728
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-02
Accepted: 2025-11-10
Published: 2025-11-21
Abstract
In the multifaceted reality of today's English language teaching (ELT) classrooms, a single curriculum is insufficient to meet the needs of all learners, making a flexible and responsive approach essential. Teachers face the challenge of addressing variations in students’ proficiency levels, learning preferences, and motivational backgrounds. Differentiated Instruction (DI) has emerged as a key pedagogical framework to support inclusion and learner engagement. However, research on DI in ELT remains fragmented, with limited synthesis of its implementation patterns, pedagogical outcomes, and contextual challenges. Accordingly, this review aims to consolidate recent research to identify trends, thematic patterns, and pedagogical implications of DI in ELT. Sixteen peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025 and indexed in Scopus and Web of Science were analyzed using a thematic synthesis approach guided by the PRISMA framework, and relevance-based selection ensured analytical consistency. Findings confirm DI’s potential to enhance learner engagement, motivation, and autonomy. From the analysis, five major thematic clusters were identified, encompassing teachers’ beliefs, pedagogical implementation, effectiveness, professional readiness, and research trends. Despite its benefits, DI implementation remains inconsistent due to limited teacher preparation, time constraints, and contextual barriers. The review concludes that sustained institutional support, targeted professional development, and context-sensitive frameworks are essential to translating DI from theory into consistent classroom practice.
Keywords
Differentiated Instruction (DI); English Language Teaching (ELT)
Downloads
References
1. Al-Breiki, S. M., Al-Mekhlafi, A. M., & Smaoui, C. (2025). EFL Teachers‘Beliefs on and Practices of Differentiated Instruction in Oman. World Journal of English Language, 15(4), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n4p128 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Al Siyabi, H., & Al Shekaili, S. (2021). Exploring EFL teachers’ readiness for differentiated instruction in Oman. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Asriadi, A., Rahim, R., & Yunus, M. (2023). Mapping global research trends on differentiated instruction: A bibliometric review (2018–2023). Indonesian Journal of Language Education, 7(3), 220–237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bhandari, V. (2025). English language teachers' practices of differentiated instruction: A case from Nepal. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 12(1), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bi, M., Struyven, K., & Zhu, C. (2023). Variables that influence teachers’ practice of differentiated instruction in Chinese classrooms: A study from teachers’ perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1124259. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124259 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Elyas, T., Mahboob, A., & Alghamdi, A. (2020). Differentiated instruction and learner diversity in Saudi EFL classrooms. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 340–359. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Gibbs, K. (2023). Voices in practice: Challenges to implementing differentiated instruction by teachers and school leaders in an Australian mainstream secondary school. The Australian Educational Researcher, 50, 1217-1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-022-00551-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hall, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. http://www.cast.org/publications/ncac/ncac_diffinstruc.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Hall, T. (2021). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective differentiated instruction (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hidayat, M., Utami, I., & Setiawan, R. (2024). Teacher creativity in implementing differentiated instruction in Indonesian EFL contexts. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Keddie, A., MacDonald, K., Blackmore, J., & Gobby, B. (2023). Teacher professional autonomy in an atypical government school: matters of relationality and context. Oxford Review of Education, 50(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2023.2236941. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Liang, J. C., & Zou, B. (2025). Institutional readiness and teacher collaboration in differentiated instruction for Chinese EFL contexts. TESOL International Journal, 20(1), 18–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Magableh, I., & Abdullah, M. (2020). The impact of differentiated instruction on students’ motivation and achievement in UAE English classrooms. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 14(2), 221–239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mansoor, A., Rehman, S., & Ali, N. (2025). Pakistani EFL teachers’ perceptions of differentiated instruction and inclusive teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 27(1), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Narayanan, M., Shields, A. L., & Delhagen, T. J. (2024). Autonomy in the spaces: teacher autonomy, scripted lessons, and the changing role of teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2297229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Nejad, A. (2024). Understanding teachers’ perceptions of differentiated instruction in U.S. ESL programs. Journal of Language and Education, 10(1), 35–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Oktoma, R. (2025). Differentiated Learning in Teaching English Subject of The Elementary School in Indonesia. International Journal of Research in Education, 5(1), 13-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Osae, D., & Papadopoulos, I. (2024). Institutional support and teacher preparedness for differentiated instruction in Rwandan ESL classrooms. African Journal of Educational Studies, 14(2), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Pham, H. (2023). Differentiating instruction in the language classroom: A conceptual framework and a qualitative case study. TESOL Journal, 14(2), e712. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.712 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Sapan, H., & Mede, E. (2022). The effects of differentiated instruction on EFL learners’ academic achievement and motivation in Turkey. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(3), 450–466002E [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Sapkota, H. P. (2025). Differentiated instruction in EFL classrooms: A systematic review. Journal of Natural Language and Linguistics, 3(1), 201–208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Sarzhanova, A., Zhubanova, S., & Nurmakhanova, G. (2023). Differentiated instruction in Kazakhstani EFL classrooms: Teachers’ strategies and challenges. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 180–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Sofiana, N., Widodo, H., & Susanto, D. (2024). Teacher professional development and curriculum alignment for differentiated instruction under the Merdeka curriculum in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies, 28(1), 90–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Strogilos, V., Lim, L., & Buhari, N. B. M. (2021). Differentiated instruction for students with SEN in mainstream classrooms: Contextual features and types of curriculum modifications. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(4), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1984873 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Suprayogi, S., de Lange, J., & Mavondo, F. (2024). “Differentiation is sometimes a hit and miss”: Educator perceptions of differentiated instruction in the higher education sector. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00904-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Tajik, O., Noor, S., & Golzar, J. (2024b). Investigating differentiated instruction and the contributing factors to cater EFL students’ needs at the collegial level. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9, Article 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00299-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Tajik, M., Rahmani, A., & Naimi, S. (2024a). Implementing differentiated instruction in Afghan EFL classrooms: Teachers’ practices and constraints. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(2), 67–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Umar, N. H. B., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2024). Differentiated instruction in ESL classrooms: Insights from ESL primary school teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan, 49(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2024-49.01-07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Valiandes, S. (2020). Evaluating the impact of differentiated instruction on literacy and reading in mixed ability classrooms: Quality and equity dimensions of education effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100849 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Whitley, J., Beauchamp, M. H., & Brown, C. (2021). Inclusive pedagogy and differentiated instruction: A collaborative response to diversity in education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Zólyomi, D. (2022). Hungarian teachers’ conceptions of differentiated instruction in foreign language education. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 12(3), 250–266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study