A Systematic Review of Cultural Representation in Educational Textbooks: Issues, Gaps, and Future Research Directions

Textbooks are essential tools in the education system, serving not only to transmit knowledge but also to shape students’ identities, values, and worldviews. Recent research reveals that textbooks often contain ideological and cultural biases influencing learners’ perceptions of themselves and others. This paper presents a systematic review of 23 Scopus-indexed studies (2010–2025) on cultural representation in educational textbooks. Using the PRISMA 2020 framework, data were thematically analysed to identify representation patterns, impacts on identity, and research gaps concerning cultural inclusion. Findings indicate a persistent dominance of Western cultural perspectives, with symbolic portrayals of local and global cultures, and notable gender bias reinforcing patriarchal norms. The review highlights the need for culturally just, inclusive, and empathetic textbook design. The outcomes contribute to a conceptual framework for advancing equitable cultural representation and guiding future educational research toward a more inclusive global curriculum.

Systematic review; Textbooks; Cultural representation; Student identity

1. S. Alameh, H. Li, and Y. Chen, “Integrating cultural perspectives in STEM education: A comparative study of science textbooks,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 255–273, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. A. N. Anyichie, C. I. Okeke, and A. Uche, “Cultural identity and academic engagement among minority students: The mediating role of self-esteem,” J. Multicult. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 512–530, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. M. Byram, Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. M. Cabrera Romero, “Intercultural communicative competence in EFL textbooks: A global analysis,” Lang. Cult. Curric., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 421–438, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. M. E. Falagas, E. I. Pitsouni, G. A. Malietzis, and G. Pappas, “Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses,” FASEB J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 338–342, 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. R. Fithriani, “Gender representation in Indonesian EFL textbooks: A critical discourse analysis,” Asian EFL J., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 45– 67, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. C. E. M. Franklin, J. Hodgson, and M. Park, “Culturally responsive teaching in reading instruction: Effects on student motivation and achievement,” Read. Horiz., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 298–312, 1996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. D. Grey, “Textbooks as ideological tools: The cultural politics of curriculum,” J. Educ. Policy, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 213–230, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. A. Jehle, S. Meyer, and H. Roth, “Gender balance in European language textbooks: Progress and persistence of stereotypes,” Gender Educ., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 603–620, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. B. B. Kachru, The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures, 2nd ed. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press, 1992. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. G. Kress and T. van Leeuwen, Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. R. Lestariyana, A. Wijaya, and F. Nugroho, “Cultural elements in Southeast Asian ELT textbooks: A multimodal study,” Asian J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 15–33, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and PRISMA Group, “Preferred [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: The PRISMA statement,” PLoS Med., vol. 6, no. 7, e1000097, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. A. Monfared, “Towards a global model for cultural inclusivity assessment in textbooks,” J. Intercult. Stud., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 201–222, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. P. R. Moran, Teaching Culture: Perspectives in Practice. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. M. Mostafaei and A. Parsazadeh, “Developing a synergistic model for cultural representation in ELT materials,” Asian ESP J., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 125–152, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. M. Nushi and K. Aghaei, “Source, target, and international cultures in Iranian EFL textbooks: A content analysis,” TESOL J., vol. 15, no. 1, e00589, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. N. Omrani, M. Rahimi, and M. Tavakoli, “Intercultural communicative competence and textbook evaluation: A global perspective,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 553–572, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, n71, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. N. Partarakis, N. Kostaras, and C. Stephanidis, “Digital textbooks and multimodal representation of culture in the 21st century classroom,” Comput. Educ., vol. 220, 104999, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Y. Peng and J. Xiong, “Teachers as cultural mediators: Interpreting values in business English textbooks,” Int. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 278–297, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. N. Rashidi and H. Meihami, “Hidden curriculum and ideological reproduction in Iranian EFL textbooks: A critical discourse analysis perspective,” Cogent Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, 1178449, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. K. Risager, Representations of the World in Language Textbooks: A Critical Approach. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. A. Roohani and S. Hosseini, “A multimodal discourse analysis of culture in EFL textbooks,” J. Lang. Intercult. Commun., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 422–438, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. J. Smith, “Professional learning communities and teachers’ intercultural competence: A reflective practice approach,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 122, 103929, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, pp. 333–339, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. H. Tang and J. Liu, “Cultural representation in Chinese primary school ELT textbooks: A multimodal discourse analysis,” Linguist. Educ., vol. 82, 101115, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Z. Tajeddin and M. Pakzadian, “Cultural representation through the lens of Kachru’s model: A study of global ELT textbooks,” Asian EFL J., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 90–112, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UNESCO, Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and Education – All Means All. Paris: UNESCO, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. C. Weninger, “Textbooks as cultural artefacts: A multimodal perspective on culture in ELT materials,” TESOL Q., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 488–516, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. R. Williams, “Cultural self-representation and student motivation in multicultural classrooms,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 132–149, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Y. Zhang, Q. Zhou, and S. Wang, “Cultural inclusion in global ELT textbooks: A systematic review 2012–2022,” Lang. Cult. Curric., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 159–179, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Y. Zhao and C. M. Wotipka, “Gender representation in Chinese science textbooks: A longitudinal study,” Comp. Educ. Rev., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 102–129, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Q. Zhou and S. Wang, “Ideology and cultural hegemony in global English textbooks: A critical discourse analysis,” Crit. Inq. Lang. Stud., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 341–360, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. K. Bettache, “Decolonizing education: Cultural dominance and the global South in contemporary textbook discourse,” Journal of Critical Multicultural Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. 45–61, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.jcmsjournal.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Y. Lu and L. Zhang, “Cultural representations in Chinese and foreign language textbooks: A comparative content analysis,” Asia Pac. Educ. Rev., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 72–91, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. H. Li, Z. Chen, and S. Alameh, “Cultural dimensions in science and humanities textbooks: A cross-disciplinary review,” Educ. Rev., vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 88–107, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests