Absorptive Capacity, Knowledge Acquisition Intensity, and Productivity: Insights from Ghana’s Service Industry

This study examines the association between knowledge acquisition intensity and organizational productivity among service firms in Accra, Ghana, within the frameworks of the knowledge-based view and absorptive capacity theory. Using survey data from telecommunications, banking, ICT, and logistics firms, the analysis explores three hypotheses: that (H1) knowledge acquisition intensity is positively associated with productivity; (H2) the effects differ across acquisition sources—regulatory directives, customer feedback, competitor monitoring, and experiential learning; and (H3) firm characteristics such as size and tenure moderate this relationship. Descriptive and inferential analyses, including Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Spearman’s correlations, and multiple-regression and moderation models, reveal statistically significant associations between acquisition intensity and higher productivity across six performance indicators (p < .001). Regression results further indicate that regulatory and experiential sources exert the strongest influence, while moderation analysis confirms that larger and older firms experience amplified productivity benefits. The study acknowledges limitations related to cross-sectional design, recall bias, and common method variance, mitigated through procedural and statistical controls. Overall, the findings extend the knowledge-based view by demonstrating that in a regulatory-intensive African context, compliance-driven knowledge acquisition is strongly associated with organizational productivity, conditioned by firm capacity and maturity. Implications are drawn for managers and policymakers on diversifying knowledge sources and transforming regulatory learning into innovation and performance outcomes.

Knowledge acquisition; Organizational productivity

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akinwale, Y. O. (2021). Knowledge management and organizational performance: Evidence from Kenyan service firms. Journal of African Business, 22(3), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2020.1846867 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2013). Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(4), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Andreeva, T., & Kianto, A. (2021). Knowledge management practices and firm performance: A global review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 1227–1246. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Boateng, R., & Dzandu, M. D. (2022). Knowledge management in Africa: Concepts and practices. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cabrilo, S., & Dahms, S. (2021). Digital knowledge acquisition and innovation in multinational corporations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(5), 2150047. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391962150047X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Donate, M. J., & de Pablo, J. D. S. (2020). The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 118, 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York, NY: Harper Business. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Farooq, R. (2022). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance: Empirical evidence from South Asia. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2020-0512 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hislop, D., Bosua, R., & Helms, R. (2018). Knowledge management in organizations (4th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kianto, A., Vanhala, M., & Heilmann, P. (2020). Knowledge management practices and innovation performance: An empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(4), 737–755. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2019-0020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Leoni, R. (2022). Firm size, learning capabilities, and the knowledge–performance relationship. European Management Journal, 40(6), 761–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ndlovu, T., & Ngwenya, B. (2020). Knowledge acquisition, innovation, and performance of SMEs in South Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(5), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2019.1656429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Productivity growth in the knowledge economy: Measurement and drivers. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264632577-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). The knowledge economy 2023: Productivity, innovation and digital transformation. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Omotayo, F. O. (2019). Knowledge management and the performance of Nigerian service firms. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 10(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2019.10023234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Probst, G. J. B. (2008). Managing knowledge: Building blocks for success. Chichester, England: Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Teece, D. J. (2018). Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.75 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wu, Y., Li, X., & Liu, S. (2024). IT-enabled knowledge management practices and firm productivity in China. Information & Management, 61(2), 103672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar