Acceptance of Metaverse Technology in Teaching and Learning: A Case Study of Virtual Reality Course

The acceptance of metaverse technology in the field of teaching and learning (T&L) among educators and students is a relatively new and emerging area of study. While Metaverse has the potential to enhance educational experiences, its adoption and implementation in educational environments remain limited. This study aims to investigate the acceptance of metaverse in T&L and identify the factors that influence educators' willingness to use it. This study employs a quantitative research approach and utilizes a survey questionnaire that consists of Likert-scale questions, open-ended questions, and items based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The survey will be administered to students who have used the Mitoworld platform to create metaverse worlds in virtual reality classes. The study found that educators and students have a positive attitude towards the use of metaverse in T&L. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and compatibility are expected to be significant factors that influence educators' and students' acceptance of the metaverse. The study also reveals that educators who have prior experience in using virtual worlds are more likely to accept and use metaverse in their teaching practice. The findings of this study will have practical implications for educators and students who are interested in promoting the use of metaverse in teaching and learning.

Metaverse Technology, Teaching and Learning, Technology Acceptance Model

1. M. A. M. F. Arfian et al., “AutiSim: A Virtual Reality Simulation Game Based on the Autism Spectrum Disorder,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 16, no. 6, 2025, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0160657. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. A. Abraham, B. Suseelan, J. Mathew, P. Sabarinath, and A. K, “A Study on Metaverse in Education,” in 2023 7th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), IEEE, Feb. 2023, pp. 1570–1573. doi: 10.1109/ICCMC56507.2023.10083910. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. D. H. Rosman, I. F. A. M. Albakri, M. K. Mokhtar, N. M. Suaib, M. N. Nor’a, and M. Z. Zulkernain, “Virtual Emporium: Elevating Shopping Experience with Virtual Reality in Digital Mall,” in International Human-Centered Technology Conference, 2024, pp. 747– 759. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. R. Alfaisal, H. Hashim, and U. H. Azizan, “Metaverse system adoption in education: a systematic literature review,” Journal of Computers in Education, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 259–303, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40692-022-00256-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. A. M. Aburbeian, A. Y. Owda, and M. Owda, “A Technology Acceptance Model Survey of the Metaverse Prospects,” AI, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 285–302, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ai3020018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. B. Kye, N. Han, E. Kim, Y. Park, and S. Jo, “Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations,” J Educ Eval Health Prof, vol. 18, p. 32, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. N. N. B. Norazri, I. F. A. M. Albakri, M. K. Mokhtar, F. Mohamed, V. S. Chan, and M. N. A. Nor’a, “Simventure: Utilizing First Person Player Technology for Career Guidance in High Schools,” in 2024 International Conference on TVET Excellence & Development (ICTeD), 2024, pp. 38–43. doi: 10.1109/ICTeD62334.2024.10844602. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. I. F. Albakri, N. Wafiy, N. Suaib, M. Rahim, and H. Yu, “3D Keyframe Motion Extraction from Zapin Traditional Dance Videos,” 2020, pp. 65–74. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-0058-9_7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. G. D. Ritterbusch and M. R. Teichmann, “Defining the Metaverse: A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 12368– 12377, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3241809. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. D. Wagmann, M. Muehlhaus, and J. Steimle, “Move with Style! Enhancing Avatar Embodiment in Virtual Reality through Proprioceptive Motion Feedback,” in Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Sep. 2025, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1145/3746059.3747649. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. A. Tlili et al., “Is Metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: a combined content and bibliometric analysis,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 24, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40561-02 00205-x. Siyaev and G.-S. Jo, “Towards Aircraft Maintenance Metaverse Using Speech Interactions with Virtual Objects in Mixed Reality,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 6, p. 2066, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21062066. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Business Today, “Revolutionising Education: Exploring the Metaverse’s Uncharted Potential,” Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.businesstoday.com.my/2023/09/18/revolutionising- education-exploring-the-metaverses-uncharted-potential/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. SEGi University & Colleges, “A 1st for Malaysia: A University Campus in the Metaverse,” May 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.segi.edu.my/a-1st-for-malaysia-a-university-campus- in-the-metaverse/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. FocusM, “SEGi Debuts Malaysia’s First University in the Metaverse,” Jul. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://focusmalaysia.my/segi-debuts-malaysias-first-university-in- the-metaverse/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, “HKUST to Launch World’s First Twin Campuses in Metaverse,” Jul. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://hkust.edu.hk/news/research-and- innovation/hkust-launch-worlds-first-twin-campuses-metaverse [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. S. Park, “SKT Uses VR Platform to Hold Non-Face-to-Face Entrance Ceremony for University Freshmen,” Mar. 2021. [Online]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Available: https://www.ajupress.com/view/20210302135827071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. M. Erickson, “Educators Will Use Virtual Reality to Teach Anatomy,” Oct. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2020/10/educators-will- use-virtual-reality-to-teach-anatomy.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. N. Kshetri, D. Rojas-Torres, and M. Grambo, “The Metaverse and Higher Education Institutions,” IT Prof, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 69–73, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1109/MITP.2022.3222711. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. P. Uymaz and A. O. Uymaz, “Assessing acceptance of augmented reality in nursing education,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 2, p. e0263937, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263937. S. C. Dalim, H. Kolivand, H. Kadhim, M. S. Sunar, and M. Billinghurst, “Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Augmented Reality in Education: A Review of the Literature,” Journal of Computer Science, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 581–589, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.3844/jcssp.2017.581.589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. H. Lin, S. Wan, W. Gan, J. Chen, and H.-C. Chao, “Metaverse in Education: Vision, Opportunities, and Challenges,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), IEEE, Dec. 2022, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. pp. 2857–2866. doi: 10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10021004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. M. Li and Z. Yu, “A systematic review on the metaverse-based blended English learning,” Front Psychol, vol. 13, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1087508. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. L. Cui, C. Zhu, R. Hare, and Y. Tang, “MetaEdu: a new framework for future education,” Discover Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 1, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. p. 10, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s44163-023-00053-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. K. Kim, E. Yang, and J. Ryu, “Work-in-progress—The Effect of Students’ Perceptions on Intention to use Metaverse Learning Environment in Higher Education,” in 2022 8th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN), IEEE, May 2022, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.23919/iLRN55037.2022.9815996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. X. Zhang, Y. Chen, L. Hu, and Y. Wang, “The metaverse in education: Definition, framework, features, potential applications, challenges, and future research topics,” Front Psychol, vol. 13, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. J. de la F. Prieto, P. Lacasa, and R. Martínez-Borda, “Approaching metaverses: Mixed reality interfaces in youth media platforms,” New Techno Humanities, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 136–145, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.techum.2022.04.004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. J. de la F. Prieto, P. Lacasa, and R. Martínez-Borda, “Approaching metaverses: Mixed reality interfaces in youth media platforms,” New Techno Humanities, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 136–145, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.techum.2022.04.004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
• Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
• Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
• Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
• Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet