Active Vs Passive Incubation: Which Method Leads to Eureka Moment in Non-Routine Problem Solving?

This study looked at how students' Eureka experiences and performance in solving non-routine mathematical problems were affected by both active and passive incubation. It investigated whether doing a cognitively stimulating task (active incubation) or resting without mental engagement (passive incubation) affects problem-solving outcomes. It was based on Wallas's (1926) four-stage model of creativity and the unconscious work hypothesis. 43 purposefully chosen special science high school students participated in the study, which used a quantitative descriptive–comparative design. They worked through non-routine math tasks over the course of two sessions, separated by an incubation period. The instruments were determined to be dependable after being properly validated and pilot tested. The Kruskal–Wallis H test, Spearman's rho correlation, and descriptive statistics were used to examine the data. The findings showed that students who were actively incubated outperformed those who were passively incubated, though differences were not statistically significant. The Eureka experience also showed no significant correlation with performance. The findings highlight the complex role of incubation and insight in problem solving and suggest incorporating structured incubation and metacognitive strategies in mathematics instruction.

Eureka moment; non-routine problem-solving

1. Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2017). After the “Aha!”: Understanding the cognitive mechanisms of incubation in creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(3), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2017). After the “Aha!”: Understanding the cognitive mechanisms of incubation in creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(3), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Allen, A. P., & Thomas, K. E. (2011). A dual process account of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 109–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Insight. In APA Dictionary of Psychology.https://dictionary.apa.org/insight [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bullard, E. (2024). Purposive sampling. EBSCO Research Starters: Social Sciences and Humanities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/purposivesampling#:~:text=Purposive%20sampling%2C%20also%20known%20as,characteristics%20relevant%2 0to%20their%20study [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Camarista, G. G. (2016). The art of problem solving. Lorimar Publishing Incorporated. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Carlson, M. P., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0808-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Danek, A. H., & Wiley, J. (2017). What about false insights? Deconstructing the Aha! experience along its multiple dimensions for correct and incorrect solutions separately. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2077. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gilhooly, K. J. (2016). Incubation and intuition in creative problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1076. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gilhooly, K. J., Georgiou, G., & Devery, U. (2013). Incubation and creativity: Do something different. Thinking and Reasoning, 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2012.749812 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gilhooly, K. J., Georgiou, G. J., Garrison, J., Reston, J. D., & Sirota, M. (2012). Don’t wait to incubate: Immediate versus delayed incubation in divergent thinking. Memory & Cognition, 40. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0199-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hayes, A. (2024). Descriptive statistics. Investopedia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/descriptive_statistics.asp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kohn, N., & Smith, S. M. (2020). Revisiting the incubation effect: Does taking a break really help? Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.372 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2015). The Eureka factor: Aha moments, creative insight, and the brain. Random House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2020). The origins of insight: Cognitive and neural mechanisms of creative problem solving. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2020). The neuroscience of insight: What we know and how to proceed. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0313-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Krawczyk, D. C., Meyer, A., & Radvansky, G. A. (2022). The cognitive neuroscience of problemsolving and creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 421–447. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpsych-020821-122911 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kuzle, A. (2013). Patterns of metacognitive behavior during mathematics problem solving in a dynamic geometry environment. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(1), 20–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. https://www.iejme.com/download/patterns-of-metacognitive-behavior-during-mathematics-problemsolving-in-a-dynamic-geometry.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Laukkonen, R. E., Ingledew, D. J., & Schooler, J. W. (2021). The neuroscience of insight: How introspection and awareness shape creative cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 131, 1080–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Leikin, R. (2019). Creativity and mathematics education: The state of the art. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01045-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. McClenaghan, E. (2024). The Kruskal–Wallis test. Technology Networks. https://www.technologynetworks.com/informatics/articles/the-kruskal-wallis-test-370025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. McClenaghan, E. (2024). Spearman Rank Correlation. Technology Networks. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. https://www.technologynetworks.com/tn/articles/spearman-rank-correlation-385744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Metcalfe, J. (1986). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(2), 288–294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. https://doi.org/10.1037/02787393.12.2.288 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mills, C., Raffaelli, Q., Irving, Z. C., Stan, D., Christoff, K., & Smallwood, J. (2018). Is an off-task mind a freely-moving mind? Examining the relationship between different dimensions of thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 58, 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.10.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2020). Motivated information processing and creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(6), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420951592 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ormerod, T. (2009). Mechanisms underlying incubation in problem-solving: Evidence for unconscious cue assimilation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Peñaloza, A. A., & Calvillo, D. P. (2012). Incubation provides relief from artificial fixation in problem solving.Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 338-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.730329 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Poincaré, H. (1913). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, The value of science, Science and method. New York and Garrison, N. Y.: The Science Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ritter, S. M., Dijksterhuis, A., & Van Baaren, R. B. (2021). Creativity in the wild: How incubation benefits problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 33(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1866817 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Mathematical thinking and problem solving (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sio, U. N. (2007). The role of an incubation period in creative problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701397453 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Mechanisms underlying incubation in problem-solving: Evidence for unconscious cue assimilation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Subedi, M. (2023). Use of mixed methods in social sciences research. Nepalese Journal of Development and Rural Studies, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.3126/njdrs.v20i01.64166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. J. Cape: London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Zedelius, C. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2016). The richness of inner experience: Relating styles of daydreaming to creative processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 661. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00661. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
• Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
• Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
• Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
• Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples