Adaptation of the Use of the Makerspace Resources for the Improvement of the Education System in East Africa
Authors
F4L Project Liaison coordinator, AKU-IED.EA, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Institute for Educational Development, Aga Khan University, East Africa (Kenya)
Dean, AKU-IED.EA, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Institute for Educational Development, Aga Khan University, East Africa (Kenya)
Head of Programmes, AKU-IED.EA, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Institute for Educational Development, Aga Khan University, East Africa (Kenya)
F4L Project Manager, AKU-IED.EA, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Institute for Educational Development, Aga Khan University, East Africa (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000808
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 9905-9916
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-07
Accepted: 2025-11-10
Published: 2025-11-24
Abstract
Adopting new teaching and learning methods to improve learning outcomes is a critical concern in contemporary education. In line with this, the Makerspace movement, accompanied by Design Thinking, is being ingrained into teacher education as a strategy to enhance the performance of teacher educators and the quality of pre-service teachers. Borrowing from constructivism theory, Makerspaces provide opportunities for tutors, student teachers, and school learners to develop artifacts that aid and demonstrate their learning. This paper examines how Makerspace materials might be incorporated into teacher education and school classrooms, emphasizing strategies, empirical findings, and actionable recommendations derived from a study across four East African teacher preparation institutions. Findings from the concurrent mixed methods approach show that Makerspaces foster a culture of experimentation, iteration, and continuous learning, encouraging innovation, empowering teachers, and promoting the development of inclusive and genderresponsive resources. The study concludes that the initiative marks a revolutionary turn in education, aligning with global trends for inclusive and creative learning while offering a highly scalable pedagogical model for resource-constrained contexts. The report recommends sustained continuous professional development and the integration of competency-based assessment strategies to ensure long-term sustainability.
Keywords
Design thinking, gender-responsive resources, makerspace, teacher educator
Downloads
References
1. Abdurrahman, A., Blackley, S., & Hachey, A. (2019). Makerspaces are essential for STEM education due to their capability to promote 21st-century skills such as creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09817-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Eckhardt, J., Kaletka, C., Pelka, B., Unterfrauner, E., Voigt, C., & Zirngiebl, M. (2021). Gender in the making: An empirical approach to understand gender relations in the maker movement. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 145, 102548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102548 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Falloon, G. (2015). Making a Maker Culture: Necessary Learning Outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 311–322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Gershenfeld, N. (2005). Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop — From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. The MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to Learn: Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Max, A., Lukas, S., & Weitzel, H. (2023). The pedagogical makerspace: Learning opportunity and challenge for prospective teachers’ growth of TPACK. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13324 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Oswald, K., & Zhao, X. (2021). Collaborative learning in makerspaces: A grounded theory of the role of collaborative learning in makerspaces. SAGE Open, 11(2), 215824402110207. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211020732 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Pepin, K., Knock, A., & Razat, A. (2023). Student agency and makerspaces: Active participation in the learning process. In Innovative Pedagogies in Teacher Education (pp. 235–255). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95060-6_26-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Saorín, J. L., Melian-Diaz, D., Bonnet, A., & Carbonell-Carrera, C. (2017b). Enhancing competency-based education through makerspaces. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(4), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2017.2669994 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Saorín, J. L., Melian-Díaz, D., Bonnet, A., Carbonell Carrera, C., Meier, C., & De La Torre-Cantero, J. (2017). Makerspace teaching-learning environment to enhance creative competence in engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Smith, A., & Light, A. (2017). Cultivating sustainable developments with makerspaces | Cultivando desenvolvimento sustentável com espaços maker. Liinc Em Revista, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v13i1.3900 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Smith, S. E., & Light, G. (2017). Promoting environmental responsibility in educational settings. Environmental Education Research, 23(5), 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1157426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Soomro, S. A., Casakin, H., Nanjappan, V., & Georgiev, G. V. (2023). Makerspaces fostering creativity: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(4), 530–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10041-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Soomro, A. H., Jawad, R., & Tariq, H. (2023b). Breaking traditional thinking through dynamic and collaborative makerspaces. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10041-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Stevens, E. (2023). What is the Design Thinking Process: The Five Steps Complete Guide. Retrieved from https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/ux-design/design-thinking-process/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Wagner, T., & Dintersmith, T. (2015). Most Likely to Succeed: Preparing Our Kids for the Innovation Era. Scribner. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study