Addressing the Challenges of Using Teaching Aids in Primary School Classrooms
Authors
Prime University (Bangladesh)
Prime University (Bangladesh)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000390
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 4732-4741
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-12
Accepted: 2025-10-20
Published: 2025-11-13
Abstract
An aid refers to a tool, device, or object essential for carrying out a task. A teaching aid is specifically used for instructional purposes in the classroom. This study sought to identify and examine the particular challenges teachers face when using teaching aids in the classroom. A qualitative design and interview method were used to address the research questions. Data were gathered from ten purposively selected schools and a simple random sample of twenty teachers from those schools from Dhaka and Satkhira. In-depth, one-on-one interviews with primary teachers served as the primary data collection tool, and thematic analysis was employed. Ten themes emerged from the analysis. The findings indicate that, despite teachers’ motivation to use teaching aids, they encounter multiple challenges. These challenges were grouped into two categories. Internal classroom challenges include teachers' reluctance, large class size, inadequate time management, limited ICT skills, heavy workload, and lack of lesson preparation. External challenges encompass poor storage systems, insufficient provision of suitable teaching aids, weak supervision and monitoring, inadequate school facilities and resources, and government policy. The study recommends strategies such as fostering a professional mindset, investing in teacher training, revising government policy on teaching aids, improving teacher recruitment, and enhancing supervision and monitoring.
Keywords
Teaching Aids, Primary Education, Classroom Challenges
Downloads
References
1. Aubrey, C. (1997). Mathematics teaching in the early years: An investigation into teachers' subject knowledge. London, England: Falmer Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Almazroui, A. (2013). Shortened school days would not help children learn. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Baker, D. P., Fabrega, R., Galindo, C., & Mishook, J. (2004). Instructional time and national achievement: Cross-national evidence. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 34(3), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-004-5310-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Brophy, J., Good, T. L., & Wittrock, M. C. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed., p. 16). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Eison, J. (2010). Using active learning instructional strategies to create excitement and enhance learning. University of South Florida. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747890150102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Farbman, D., Christie, K., Davis, J., Griffith, M., & Zinth, J. D. (2011). Learning time in America: Trends to reform the American school calendar. Boston, MA: National Center on Time & Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (1996). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hill, H. C., & Lubienski, S. T. (2005). Teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching and school context: A study of California teachers [Manuscript submitted for publication]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Sarker, M. Z., Ohiduzzaman, D. K., Rabiul Islam, K. M. S. A., & Hassan, D. M. N. (2017, June). A study on implementation of ICT in education training in government primary schools [Report]. Mymensingh, Dhaka: National Academy for Primary Education (NAPE). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. National Education Commission on Time and Learning. (2005). Prisoners of time. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (Original work published 1994) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Allen, A. B. (2010). Extending the school day or school year: A systematic review of research (1985–2009). Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 401–436. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310377086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Pennington, H. C. (2006). Expanded learning time in high schools. Washington, DC: National Center on Time & Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Pia, K. F. (2015). Barriers in teaching-learning process of mathematics at secondary level: A quest for quality improvement. American Journal of Education Research, 3(7), 822–832. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Raj, H. (1984). Theory and practice in social research. Delhi, India: Surjeet Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Rashid, M., & Ritu, S. (2013). Teachers’ professional preparation, income, job satisfaction, and performance: An exploratory study. Bangladesh Education Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Silva, E. (2007). On the clock: Rethinking the way schools use time. Washington, DC: Education Sector. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Tasnim, J. (2014). An investigation into teachers’ attitude towards teaching aids in science classroom at secondary level in Dhaka city. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. University of Missouri. (2018, April 27). More than 9 in 10 elementary school teachers feel highly stressed. ScienceDaily. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180427125619.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Halim, M. A. (2011). A comparative study of mathematics curriculum at primary level in Bangladesh and India (West Bengal). Bangladesh Education Article. https://bdeduarticle.com/a-comparative-study-of-mathematics-curriculum-at-primary-level-in-bangladesh-and-india-west-bengal/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study