Advancing Universal Design through Inclusive Packaging and Visual

Visual accessibility in packaging design remains a pressing global challenge, with over 2.2 billion people living with some form of visual impairment and many facing exclusion from independent product use and consumer decision-making. In Malaysia, national surveys indicate high prevalence of visual impairment among older adults, highlighting the urgent need for inclusive design strategies that integrate tactile, visual, and digital cues. This study aims to advance understanding of how universal design can be applied through inclusive packaging and graphic design practices to enhance accessibility for visually impaired users. Guided by Universal Design Theory, the Social Model of Disability, and Multisensory Design Theory, this conceptual paper synthesizes recent literature on tactile packaging features, high contrast visual elements, and smart packaging technologies. The methodology involves a critical review of peer-reviewed studies, supported by a conceptual framework that illustrates the relationships between design strategies, user comprehension, usability, and social inclusion. Findings from the literature indicate that while tactile and digital features significantly improve accessibility, their integration in commercial practice remains limited due to cost, manufacturing constraints, and lack of policy enforcement. The paper contributes theoretically by positioning inclusive packaging within multiple design and disability frameworks, and practically by offering strategies for designers, industry, and policymakers. Implications suggest that inclusive packaging should be mainstreamed as a design responsibility rather than a niche adaptation, with future research directed toward empirical validation, cross-cultural analysis, and long-term industry adoption.

Inclusive Packaging Design, Universal Design, Visual Accessibility

1. Chandler, D. (2017). Semiotics: The basics (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641635 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Dzhurynskyi, Y., Mayik, V., & Mayik, L. (2024). Enhancing accessibility: Automated tactile graphics generation for individuals with visual impairments. Computation, 12(12), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation12120251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gilbert, R. M. (2019). Inclusive design for a digital world: Designing with accessibility in mind. Apress. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gopan, B. (2025). Sensory inclusivity in retail environments. Journal of Retail Design and Innovation, 14(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/27696577.2025.1234567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gulati, S., & Shivani. (2022). Accessible cosmetic packaging for visually impaired and blind users. Design for All Institute of India Journal, 17(4), 32–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Inclusive Packaging: Bridging the gap for all consumers. (2024). Plastics Engineering, 80(5), 24–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kevin-Tang, X. H., Tajunisah, I, Lott, P. P. W., & Reddy, S. C. (2024). Prevalence of visual impairment and eye diseases in Malaysia: A cross-sectional prospective study at the University of Malaya Medical Centre. Malaysian Family Physician, 19, 30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Loke, J. Y., Rampal, S., Che Hamzah, J., Lim, Y. W., & Kamalden, T. A. (2025). Visual impairment in any eye adversely affects quality of life: Psychometric validation of the Malay NEI VFQ-25. PLoS ONE, 20(6), e0324979. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324979 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mace, R. L. (1998). Universal design in housing. Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Microsoft Packaging & Content Team. (2024). Creating accessible packaging: An inclusive design guide. Microsoft Corporation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mustić, D., Cigula, T., & Kovacević, D. (2025). Adaptation of packaging for the elderly population: Challenges and opportunities of inclusive design. In Proceedings of the Global Conference on Aging and Gerontology, 2(1). Dpublication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oliver, M. (2020). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (5th ed., pp. 67–73). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Omidiran, A. T., Martins, I. E., Obadina, A. O., & Bogueva, D. (2024). Consumer perception of food packaging. In Consumer perceptions and food (pp. 491–511). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7687-0_29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Raynal, M., Ducasse, J., Macé, M. J.-M., Oriola, B., & Jouffrais, C. (2024). The FlexiBoard: Tangible and tactile graphics for people with vision impairments. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(3), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8030017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Salowi, M. A., Naing, N. N., Mustafa, N., Wan Nawang, W. R., Sharudin, S. N., & Ngah, N. F. (2024). Prevalence of visual impairment and its causes in adults aged 50 years and older: Estimates from the National Eye Surveys in Malaysia. PLoS ONE, 19(10), e0299768. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299768 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Spence, C. (2021). Designing for the multisensory mind. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00323-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Journey Through Craceland: Micro-Ecological Breakdown in Jim Crace’s Being Dead
• The Introvert’s Toolkit
• Explore the Potential Benefits of Popularizing Ink Wash Painting Art Style in Video Games
• “An Worthwhile Review of Niosmes”
• Consumer Behaviour Towards Clothing Brands: Role of Fashion Bloggers and Influencers