Aligning and Quantifying Higher Education Institutions’ Climate Actions With Nationally Determined Contributions Through AI-Enabled Data Discovery and Verification

Higher education institutions (HEIs) serve as knowledge producers and innovation ecosystems in climate governance, yet their contributions remain limited in formal accountability frameworks. This research presents a comprehensive framework that systematically discovers, quantifies, and reports HEIs' climate contributions through integrated automated web scraping, Artificial Intelligence, semantic modelling, and standardised data submission protocols. The system extracts climate action data from digital sources and structures it using a Climate Action Data Model (CADM). Each climate action undergoes automated impact quantification using standardised emission calculation methodologies aligned with IPCC protocols and localised emission factors. A standardised data submission mechanism enables systematic transmission of quantified interventions to established national Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) systems, facilitating integration into provincial and national climate transparency frameworks. Pilot implementation across nineteen Sri Lankan universities validates the framework's technical robustness and policy relevance. The system achieves automated data extraction with the precision of 0.87 and the recall of 0.82, while the RAG-based Large Language Model generates evidence-grounded climate action classifications with the factual grounding of 0.91, effectively minimising hallucinations. This research delivers a scalable, replicable architecture for establishing AI-enabled university climate data pipelines that bridge the gap between institutional sustainability efforts and formal national climate accounting, positioning universities as verifiable implementing nodes in global climate governance. By demonstrating that digitally documented climate actions can be systematically discovered, quantified, and integrated into national MRV systems, the framework establishes a pathway for transforming fragmented institutional initiatives into formally recognised contributions to national climate commitments under the Paris Agreement.

Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Climate

1. Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE). (2023). STARS: Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (Version 2.2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ávila, L. V., Filho, W. L., Brandli, L. L., Macgregor, C. J., Molthan-Hill, P., Özuyar, P. G., & Moreira, R. M. (2023). Barriers to the implementation of the sustainable development goals in universities around the world. Challenges, 7(1), 15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Caeiro, S., Leal Filho, W., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Azeiteiro, U. M. (2020). Sustainability assessment and reporting in higher education institutions. Environmental Development, 33, 100509. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., & Van Liedekerke, L. (2015). Sustainability reporting in higher education: A comprehensive review of the recent literature and paths for further research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 127–143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Findler, F., Schönherr, N., Lozano, R., Reider, D., & Martinuzzi, A. (2019). The impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development: A review and conceptualization. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(1), 23–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Goni, F. A., Saidu, M. B., Adamu, A. A., & Memon, S. B. (2023). Assessing sustainable practices in higher education institutions: A systematic review of sustainability ranking systems and frameworks. Sustainability, 15(2), 1343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gunathilake, P., Hewawasam, T., & Gunatilake, J. (2025). Optimising Nationally Determined Contributions implementation through AI and graph data modelling. The 2nd International Conference on University-Industry Collaborations for Sustainable Development (ICSD 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hogan, A., Blomqvist, E., Cochez, M. (2021). Knowledge graphs. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Huang, L., Krause, J., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Generative AI for environmental risk summarization: A retrieval-augmented approach. Environmental Data Science, 2, e31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Izacard, G., & Grave, E. (2021). Leveraging passage retrieval with generative models for open-domain question answering. Proceedings of ACL 2021, 874–880. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ji, L., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., & Chen, Z. (2023). Evaluating university sustainability performance under climate-change goals: A multi-criteria approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A. (2020). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for knowledge-intensive NLP. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 9459-9474. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lozano, R. (2011). The state of sustainability reporting in universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 67–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ministry of Environment Sri Lanka. (2021). Update of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Colombo: Government of Sri Lanka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Salleh, H. M., Jusoh, M. S., & Ismail, A. M. (2017). Sustainability initiatives in Malaysian public universities: The role of campus sustainability committees. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 226(1), 012057. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for sustainable development: An expert review of processes and learning. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Touvron, H., Martin, L., Stone, K. (2023). LLaMA 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. UI GreenMetric. (2024). World University Ranking Methodology. Universitas Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. UNESCO. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. UNFCCC. (2015). Paris Agreement. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: UN. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. University Leaders for a Sustainable Future (ULSF). (1990). The Talloires Declaration: University leaders for a sustainable future. Talloires, France: Tufts University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zou, H., Chen, Y., & Li, T. (2023). ESGReveal: An LLM-based approach for extracting structured data from ESG reports. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study