An Assessment on 3Rs (Reading, Writing, Arithmetic) Skills among Elementary Pupils in Lanao del Sur I

Authors

Asliah C. Mamalampac, Ph.D

Mindanao State University, Marawi City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000811

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 9938-9946

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-08

Accepted: 2025-11-15

Published: 2025-11-25

Abstract

This study conducted a comprehensive evaluation of Grade 3 to 6 pupils' proficiency in foundational skills of Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic (3Rs) within the Lanao del Sur I Division, using a descriptive quantitative research design. A rigorously validated 3Rs Diagnostic Assessment Tool was employed to identify learning gaps that have widened due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The assessment, which highlighted significant deficiencies particularly in reading comprehension, creative writing, and arithmetic word problem-solving, revealed a critical need for targeted curriculum enhancements. Inferential statistical methods, including t-tests and ANOVA, were used to analyze performance variances across grade levels and gender, uncovering both statistically significant improvements and areas of stagnation. To address these gaps, the study proposes a follow-up intervention plan focused on learner-centered, culturally responsive teaching practices, supported by teacher training in evidence-based strategies. This nuanced approach aims to align local educational efforts with UNESCO's Education 2030 framework, enhancing equitable access to quality education and fostering robust academic performance across the student body.

Keywords

Learning gaps, 3Rs skills

Downloads

References

1. 1 Ball, J. (2010). Enhancing learning of children from diverse language backgrounds: Mother tongue-based bilingual or multilingual education in the early years. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. 2 Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252–263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. 3 Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S. L., & Billman, A. K. (2018). Essential elements of fostering and assessing reading comprehension. In What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 51–93). International Reading Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. 4 Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2019). Evidence-based writing practices: A meta-analysis of existing research. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 161–184.https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1626627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. 5 OECD. (2019). Future of Education and Skills 2030: Conceptual learning framework. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. 6 Pretorius, E. J., & Currin, S. (2019). Learning to read and reading to learn: A longitudinal study of literacy teaching and learning in primary schools. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v9i1.634 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. 7 Siegler, R. S., Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H., & Zhou, X. (2020). Fractions: The new frontier for theories of numerical development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. 8 Tan, D., & Tan, A. (2021). Promoting creative writing through student-centered learning strategies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(4), 698–705.https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1204.08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles