Analysis of Fakhr Al-Dīn Al-Rāzī’s Exegesis on the Deviation of Pluralist Interpretations

The phenomenon of pluralist interpretation has become increasingly prominent in contemporary Islamic thought, particularly through the influence of modern ideologies that advocate religious inclusivism, truth relativism, and universal salvation. These ideologies reinterpret Qur’anic teachings to promote the notion that all religions are equally valid paths to God. This study aims to examine the interpretative deviations arising from pluralist readings of the Qur’an, specifically in relation to the ideology of religious inclusivism as reflected in Surah Āl ‘Imrān (3:19): “Indeed, the religion with Allah is Islam.” It also seeks to analyze the exegetical approach of Imam Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī in Tafsīr al-Kabīr as a classical and authoritative framework that reaffirms the exclusivity of Islam and the principle of tawḥīd. This research employs a qualitative methodology, utilizing textual and content analysis to critically examine the writings of modern Islamic pluralist thinkers who interpret this verse through the lens of inclusivism. Their views are systematically compared with Imam al-Rāzī’s exegetical approach to highlight the epistemological and theological differences between modern ideological interpretations and traditional Islamic hermeneutics. The findings reveal that pluralist interpretations often detach the verse from its theological and linguistic context, redefining al-Islām as a universal attitude of submission to God that encompasses all faiths. This approach undermines the Qur’anic affirmation of Islam as the final and exclusive divine religion. In contrast, Imam al-Rāzī interprets al-Islām in this verse as the specific revelation brought by Prophet Muhammad, representing the culmination of divine guidance and the abrogation of previous religious laws. In conclusion, the study emphasizes the necessity of returning to classical exegetical principles, as exemplified by Imam al-Rāzī, to preserve the integrity of Qur’anic interpretation and protect it from modern ideological distortions. By reaffirming the exclusivity of Islam as the true religion in the sight of Allah, this research underscores the enduring relevance of traditional exegesis in addressing contemporary pluralist and inclusivist readings of the Qur’an.

Tafsir, Imam al-Rāzī, Deviation, Pluralism

1. Abdillah, M. B. (2016). Pemikiran Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī tentang al-Ism al-A‘ẓam bagi Allah SWT. Jurnal Usuluddin, 43, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abou El Fadl, K. (2005). The great theft: Wrestling Islam from the extremists. New York: HarperCollins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Bājūrī, I. (1419H). Tuhfat al-Murīd ‘alā Jawharat al-Tawḥīd (A. Jumu‘ah, Ed.). Qāhirah: Dār al-Salām. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Bannā, J. (2008). Tafnīd da‘wā ḥadd al-riddah. Qāhirah: Dār al-Shurūq. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Bukhārī, M. ibn Ismā‘īl. (1993). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Dimashq: Dār Ibn Kathīr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al-Ghazālī, M. (1438H). Al-Iqtiṣād fī al-I‘tiqād. Qāhirah: Saqīfat al-Ṣafā al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (2005). Fuṣūl fī al-‘Aqīdah bayn al-Salaf wa al-Khalaf. Qāhirah: Maktab Wahbah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Al-Qazwīnī, A. ibn Fāris. (1979). Mu‘jam maqāyīs al-lughah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Al-Qurṭubī, M. ibn A. al-Anṣārī. (2006). Al-Jāmi‘ li-aḥkām al-Qur’ān (24 jilid). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Al-Rāzī, F. al-D. M. ibn ‘Umar. (1357H). Tafsīr al-Kabīr. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Al-Rāzī, F. al-D. M. ibn ‘Umar. (1401H). Tafsīr al-Fakhr al-Rāzī. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Al-Rāzī, F. al-D. M. ibn ‘Umar. (1420H). Tafsīr al-Fakhr al-Rāzī al-mushtahir bi al-Tafsīr al-Kabīr aw Mafātīḥ al-ghayb. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Al-Rāzī, F. al-D. M. ibn ‘Umar. (2009). Al-Arba‘īn fī uṣūl al-dīn. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Al-Rāzī, F. al-D. M. ibn ‘Umar. (2011). Ta’sīs al-taqdīs. Beirut: Dār Nūr al-Ṣabāḥ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Al-Zarqānī, M. ‘A. (1409H/1988M). Manāhil al-‘irfān fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān (Jil. 2). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Al-Zarkashī, B. al-D. M. (1957). Al-Burhān fī ‘ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Al-Zuḥaylī, W. (1986). Uṣūl al-fiqh al-islāmī. Dimashq: Dār al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Al-Zuḥaylī, W. (1988). Uṣūl al-fiqh al-islāmī. Dimashq: Dār al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Al-Zuḥaylī, W. (1989). Al-fiqh al-islāmī wa adillatuh. Dimashq: Dār al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Al-Ālūsī, S. al-D. M. ibn ‘Abd Allāh. (1994). Rūḥ al-ma‘ānī fī tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘aẓīm wa al-sab‘ al-mathānī. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Arif Munandar, W. S. (2021). On the authorship of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s Al-Khalq wa al-Ba‘th. Afkar, 23(2), 171–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Beta Firmansyah. (2019). Aplikasi teori double movement Fazlur Rahman terhadap hukum memilih pemimpin non-Muslim. Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 5(1), 47–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Cahyadi, D. (2011). Takdir dalam pandangan Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī. Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Esack, F. (1997). Qur’an, liberation & pluralism. Oxford: Oneworld Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Fathullah Khalīf. (1976). Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī. Iskandariah: Dār al-Jāmi‘āt al-Miṣriyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Freeden, M. (2015). Liberalism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hamdan Hidayat. (2020). Sejarah perkembangan tafsir al-Qur’an. Al-Munir, 2(1), 29–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hick, J. (2004). An interpretation of religion: Human responses to the transcendent. New Haven: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ibn ‘Āshūr, M. al-Ṭ. (1984). Al-Taḥrīr wa al-tanwīr (30 jilid). Tunis: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li al-Nashr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ibn Kathīr, I. ibn ‘Umar. (1999). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘aẓīm (4 jilid). Beirut: Dār al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ibrahim, H. (2014). Dari kepelbagaian agama kepada pluralisme agama: Sejarah perkembangan. Gombak: Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. John Harelson, C. R. (1987). Biblical exegesis: A beginner’s handbook. Atlanta: John Knox Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Khalif Muammar. (2018). Islam dan liberalisme: Antara maṣlaḥah dan mafsadah. Afkar, 20(2), 1–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Locke, J. (1924). An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Mazlan Ibrahim, & Faiz Hadi Sanadi. (2024). Liberal Muslim interpretation of Islamic sharī‘a: An analysis. Akademika, 94(1), 14–25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Mill, J. S. (1864). On liberty. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts & Green. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Muh. Salam, & Andi Abdul Hamzah. (2022). Tafsir kebebasan beragama dalam Surah al-Baqarah ayat 62: Suatu analisis kritis terhadap Tafsir al-Manar. Tafsere, 10(1), 62–77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Muhammad Hazim, S. M. H. (2018). Keseimbangan al-Ashā‘irah dalam pentafsiran ayat al-jabr dan ayat al-ikhtiyār. Afkar, 20(1), 285–310. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Muhammad Nurman Syafruddin. (2021). Menakar nilai kritis Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī dalam tafsir Mafātīḥ al-ghayb. Takengon: IAIN Takengon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Nasr, H. (1989). Knowledge and the sacred. New York: State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Nasr, H. (2015). The study Quran: A new translation and commentary. New York: HarperCollins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Norasimah Haji Omar, & Mazlan Ibrahim. (2019). Penilaian para ulama Islam terhadap metode tafsiran aliran Salafiyyah kontemporari ke atas ayat sifat. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 16(9), 98–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Nur Zahidah Che Mohamed, M. N. Ahmad, & N. S. Mohd. (2023). Perkembangan ilmu tafsir merentas zaman. Turath Journal of Al-Quran and Al-Sunnah, 8(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Nur Zainatul Nadra, & Latifah Abdul Majid. (2012). Sejarah perkembangan tafsir pada zaman Rasulullah SAW, Sahabat dan Tabi‘in. Journal of Techno Social, 4(2), 43–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Sjamsoeri Joesoef. (2005). Kitab Tafsir Mafātīḥ al-ghayb (studi pemikiran al-Rāzī tentang nasakh al-Qur’an). Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Schuon, F. (1984). The transcendent unity of religions. Illinois: Theosophical Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Taufik, Z. (2021). Perennialism and the religious common platform of mystical tradition in Java. Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism, 10(2), 193–208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Ulil Azmi. (2022). Studi kitab Tafsir Mafātīḥ al-ghayb karya al-Rāzī. Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Tafsir Basha’ir, 2(2), 119–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Data Integration in Malaysian Syariah Courts: A Study of Challenges and Solutions
• The Concept of Family Well-Being from the Perspectives of Islam, Western Thought and Malaysia Madani
• Leveraging AI Tools for Islamic Scholarship: Podcast and eBook Innovations in Teaching the Sunni Intellectual Tradition
• Cryptocurrency and Shariah: Analyzing the Implications of Islamic Jurisprudence on Bitcoin and its Ethical Framework
• Islamic Credit Card and its Value-Based Proposition: A Perspective from Maqasid Al-Shariah