Analysis of Risk Management Implementation in Paliwara Landslide Mitigation Project in Hulu Sungai Utara Regency of South Kalimantan Province, Indonesia

The Paliwara Landslide Mitigation Project in Hulu Sungai Utara Regency of South Kalimantan Province is dealing with many risks that potentially able to delay project objectives achievement. The analysis in this study aims to identify key risks in the project and to evaluate these risks management using a standard of AS/NZS 4360:2004 as the management framework. Research methodology applied in this study was descriptive qualitative method, by reviewing secondary project data such as progress report, Show Cause Meeting (SCM) documentation, and implementation timeline. Result of risk identification are able to identify ten key risks including weak project management, extreme weather (heavy rainfall), remote project locations that delayed the material supply to worksite, and potential for subsequent landslides. According to the probability and impact assessment, there were two risks were classified as very high level (poor project management and disruption due to extreme weather), while one risk was classified as high level (the geotechnical risk of subsequent landslide). Meanwhile, the remaining risks were classified as moderate to low level. Mitigation strategies directed to have focus on risks with high level including strengthening project management and coordination, adapting schedule to the weather condition and implementing technical measures to stabilize slopes. This study demonstrates the importance of proactively implementing risk management for road infrastructure construction project, in particular for those projects with challenging natural and site condition to prevent future project failures.

Risk Management, Standard of AS/NZS 4360:2004, Landslide

1. Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. (2004). AS/NZS 4360:2004 Risk management. Standards Australia International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Thompson, P., & Perry, J. (1991). Engineering construction risk. London: Thomas Telford. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Yuliana, C., & Hidayat, G. (2017). Manajemen risiko pada proyek gedung bertingkat di Banjarmasin. Info Teknik, 18(2), 255–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2020). Risk management — Guidelines on using ISO 31000 in management systems (SNI ISO/TR 31004:2020). Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Muhammad Afiq (2021). Manajemen risiko pada proyek pembangunan Gedung Asrama Mahasiswa UIN Walisongo. Akselerasi, 3(1), 70–80. E-ISSN: 2715–7296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Putri, M. N., Zaidir, A. H., & Hasan, A. (2015). Analysis manajemen resiko proyek pembangunan Rumah Sakit Universitas Andalas. In Prosiding 2nd Andalas Civil Engineering National Conference. Padang (Vol. 13). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Rahman, M. H. A., & Tjendani, H. T. (2022). Identifikasi risiko pelaksanaan pembangunan proyek gedung highrise building di Hotel Grand Dafam Signature Yogyakarta. Paduraksa, 11(2), 177–185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Setiawan, S., & Budi, R. (2022). Pengaruh safety leadership terhadap perilaku keselamatan pekerja pada proyek constructs’. Journal Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja, 23(4), 77–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Wally, S. N., Jamlaay, O., & Marantika, M. (2022). Analysis manajemen risiko pada proyek Pembangunan Gedung Laboratorium Terpadu dan Perpustakaan Man 1 Maluku Tengah. Menara, 17(2), 61–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lokobal, A., Sumajouw, M. D. J., & Sompie, B. F. (2014). Manajemen risiko pada perusahaan jasa pelaksana konstruksi di Propinsi Papua (Study kasus di Kabupaten Sarmi). Journal Ilmiah Media Engineering, 4(2), 109–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Giri, J. P., Putra, I. K. A. A., & Mahendra, I. W. (2021). Identifikasi penilaian dan mitigasi risiko pada Proyek Villa Nini Elly. Gradien, 13(1), 61–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Suparno, M. W. (2015). Manajemen risiko dalam proyek konstruksi. Bangunan, 20(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ervianto, I. W. (2005). Manajemen proyek konstruksi. Yogyakarta: Andi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lisananda, A. A. (2021). Contruction risk management on wastewater piping construction based on ISO 31000:2018 risk management-guidelines. [Thesis, State Islamic University of Yogyakarta]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/29558 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Saaty, T. L. & Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Efrizon. (2014). Kajian manajemen risiko dengan menggunakan metoda risk breakdown structure dan analytical hierarchy process (Studi kasus: Proyek pembangunan Jalan Manggopoh-Padang Sawah Simpang Empat). [Thesis, Bung Hatta University]. http://scholar.unand.ac.id/id/eprint/494769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Hysteresis Behaviour and Energy Dissipation of Niger Delta Soil under Cyclic Loading Conditions
• Exploring Bamboo Leaf Ash as Supplementary Cementitious Material for Enhanced Performance in Compressive and Tension in Mortar Strength as Construction Materials
• Effect of Using a Combination of 50% Coal Dust 50 % Course Sand as Filler in Bituminous Mix Design
• A Review of the Current State of Lean Construction in Nairobi City County
• Adaptation of Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt Predictive Models for Nigerian Climatic Conditions: A Transfer Learning Approach