Apology in Law: Theoretical Foundations for Reform of Apology Law in Professional Negligence and Misconduct

Apology occupies an increasingly significant role in contemporary legal discourse, bridging the domains of moral responsibility, psychological healing, and professional accountability. Yet, in Malaysia, the absence of statutory protection for apology renders it legally perilous—discouraging professionals from expressing remorse or acknowledging fault for fear of self-incrimination. This paper advances a theoretical justification for protecting admission by apologetic discourse, situating the argument within five complementary frameworks: Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Rational Choice Theory, Game Theory, Empathy Theory, and Attribution Theory. Adopting a doctrinal and interdisciplinary approach, this study analyses the nexus between law, psychology, and behavioural economics to demonstrate how apology functions as both a restorative and preventive mechanism. Comparative models from Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom reveal that apology laws reduce litigation, improve professional integrity, and enhance public confidence. The paper argues that a theory-driven legislative framework would harmonise Malaysia’s evidentiary and professional standards with global trends, transforming apology into a legally protected instrument of reconciliation, emotional repair, and systemic efficiency.

Apology; admission; evidence; duty of candour

1. Agapiou, A., & Cheung, S. O. (2017). Apologies, apology legislation and civil disputes: the practical implications of apology legislation for dispute resolution practitioners and their clients. Arbitration, 83(2), 133-140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandes, S. (2016). The Heart of the Matter: Law, Emotion, and Moral Legitimacy. University of Chicago Law Review, 83(2), 405–439. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Becker, G. S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Carroll, A., & Goold, I. (2021). Apology legislation and professional accountability: A comparative analysis of Canadian and Australian reforms. Journal of Law and Medicine, 28(3), 456–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cheung, S. O., Zhu, L., & Yu, K. I. (2022). The value of apology in construction dispute negotiation. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(10), 1910-1923. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Choon Yong Alex, T. (2025). When An Apology Implicates A Doctor: Legal Consideration. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(4) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cramer, K. M. (2013). Six criteria of a viable theory: Putting reversal theory to the test. Journal of Motivation, Emotion, and Personality, 1(1), 9-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Friedrich, J. (2022). Anger and apology, recognition and reconciliation: Managing emotions in the wake of injustice. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(2), ksac023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gerdes, K. E., Lietz, C. A., & Segal, E. A. (2022). Empathy in Professional Practice: A Multidimensional Model. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hickson, G. B., Moore, I. N., & Pichert, J. W. (2021). Disclosure and apology: How to avoid malpractice suits. Journal of Health Law & Ethics, 18(3), 245–262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ho, B., & Liu, E. (2011). Does sorry work? The impact of apology laws on medical malpractice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 43(2), 141-167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ho, B., & Liu, E. (2019). Apologies as signals: The economics of open disclosure. American Law & Economics Review, 21(2), 291–314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kleefeld, J. C. (2007). Thinking Like a Human: British Columbia's Apology Act. UBCL Rev., 40, 769. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Liebman, J. S. (2020). Apology, forgiveness, and the law. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 38(4), 475–489. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mazzucato, M. (2021). *Mission economy: A moonshot guide to changing capitalism*. Penguin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., & Cohen, A. D. (2020). Forgiveness and apology in social conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(1), 31–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Robbennolt, J. K. (2020). Apologies and legal settlement: Empirical and experimental perspectives. Law & Society Review, 54(2), 385–412. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations [1776] (Vol. 11937). na. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Spiro, H. (2019). Empathy and the practice of medicine: Beyond the technological imperative. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 92(4), 601–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Suhaimi, N. S., Hashim, H. N. M., & Ahmad, N. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Legislative Reform of Admission by Apologetic Discourse. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI7), 449-453. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tudor, S. (2021). Making More Room for Mercy and Forgiveness. Criminal Justice Ethics, 40(2), 152163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vines, P. (2007). The power of apology: Mercy, forgiveness or corrective justice in the civil liability arena. Pub. Space: JL & Soc. Just., 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Weiner, B. (2020). Attribution Theory: Applications to Achievement, Moral Behavior, and the Law. Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (2021). Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Carolina Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Yamada, D. C. (2020). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Foundations, expansion, and assessment. U. Miami L. Rev., 75, 660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
• Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
• Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
• Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
• Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study