Applying the Islamic Mental Health Model in the Malaysian Public Service: A Case Study of Workplace Practices and Coping Strategies

This study applies the Islamic Mental Health Model (IMHM) to the Malaysian public service, examining how Malay Muslim civil servants draw on faith-based resources to sustain mental well-being and ethical conduct at work. Amid rising psychological distress, burnout, and ethical strain, existing interventions often overlook local religious–cultural realities. The IMHM, grounded in Habluminallah (relationship with Allah) and Habluminannas (relationship with others), offers a contextualised alternative for promoting mental health and governance. Using a qualitative case study design, 12 Malay Muslim employees from two public sector organisations were interviewed through semi-structured formats. Thematic analysis revealed how participants internalise and enact IMHM constructs such as tawakkul, sabr, ikhlas, solat, du‘a, syukr, amanah, ‘adl, rahmah, and ukhuwah, while also rejecting unethical practices like bribery and bullying. Findings suggest that spiritual practices serve as tools for emotional regulation and meaning-making, while ethical values shape decision-making and interpersonal conduct. However, tensions between Islamic imperatives and bureaucratic norms emerge, highlighting structural and cultural barriers to both mental health and ethical action. The study argues that IMHM protects psychological well-being and enhances moral responsibility by framing public service as both a civic duty and a religious obligation. Recommendations include integrating IMHM into public sector training, supervisory systems, and wellness initiatives. This aligns with Malaysia’s National Mental Health Strategic Plan, Sustainable Development Goals (3 and 8), and ESG-linked governance reform. The study contributes to Islamic psychology by situating faith-informed mental health within the lived realities of bureaucratic life

Islamic Mental Health Model (IMHM); Malay Muslim public servants; Faith-based coping

1. Abu-Tineh, A. M., Khasawneh, S. A., & Omari, A. A. (2008). Kouzes and Posner’s transformational leadership model in practice: The case of Jordanian schools. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(8), 648–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810916613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ai, A. L., Hall, D., Pargament, K., & Tice, T. N. (2013). Posttraumatic growth in patients who survived cardiac surgery: The predictive and mediating roles of faith-based factors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 36(2), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-012-9412-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Algahtani, H. M. S., Almulhim, A. F., AlNajjar, H. A., Ali, T., Irfan, F., Ayub, M., & Naeem, F. (2019). Cultural adaptation of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for patients with depression and anxiety in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain: A qualitative study exploring views of patients, carers and mental health professionals. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 12, e36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X19000210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. AlHarbi, H., Farrand, P., & Laidlaw, K. (2023). Understanding the beliefs and attitudes towards mental health problems held by Muslim communities and acceptability of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as a treatment: Systematic review and thematic synthesis. Discover Mental Health, 3(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-023-00052-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Beekun, R. I., & Badawi, J. A. (2005). Balancing ethical responsibility among multiple organisational stakeholders: The Islamic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-8204-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bernama. (2025, February 5). Over 40,000 civil servants at high risk of mental health issues – Zaliha. New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2025/02/1016402/over-40000-civil-servants-high-risk-mental-health-issues-zaliha [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution: Shareholders are getting serious about sustainability. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3356025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0232076. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Haque, A. (2018). Psychology from an Islamic perspective. In Global psychologies: Mental health and the Global South (pp. 137–150). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95816-0_8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kapoulitsas, M., & Corcoran, T. (2015). Compassion fatigue and resilience: A qualitative analysis of social work practice. Qualitative Social Work, 14(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014528526 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, 278730. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/278730 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ku Ishak, A., A-razak, H., & Jamaludin, N. (2021). Maintaining public servants' mental health during and after the COVID-19 pandemic through the Islamic Mental Health Model. In B. S. Sergi & A. R. Jaaffar (Eds.), Modelling economic growth in contemporary Malaysia (pp. 201–213). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-806-420211016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mohammad, H., Hayati, K. S., & Salmiah, M. S. (2016). Coping with depression, anxiety and stress: A cross-sectional study among Malaysian students in a public university. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, 15(11), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1511058395 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rathod, S., Kingdon, D., Phiri, P., & Gobbi, M. (2010). Developing culturally sensitive cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis for ethnic minority patients by exploration and incorporation of service users’ and health professionals’ views and opinions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38(5), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465810000378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rothman, A., & Coyle, A. (2018). Toward a framework for Islamic psychology and psychotherapy: An Islamic model of the soul. Journal of Religion and Health, 57(5), 1731–1744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0651-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Data Integration in Malaysian Syariah Courts: A Study of Challenges and Solutions
• The Concept of Family Well-Being from the Perspectives of Islam, Western Thought and Malaysia Madani
• Leveraging AI Tools for Islamic Scholarship: Podcast and eBook Innovations in Teaching the Sunni Intellectual Tradition
• Cryptocurrency and Shariah: Analyzing the Implications of Islamic Jurisprudence on Bitcoin and its Ethical Framework
• Islamic Credit Card and its Value-Based Proposition: A Perspective from Maqasid Al-Shariah