Assessing Financial Competency through Learning Outcome Attainment among Learners in Strategic Financial Management Module
Authors
Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.915EC00771
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 9/15 | Page No: 1560-1563
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-01
Accepted: 2025-12-07
Published: 2025-12-22
Abstract
Learning outcomes serve as the benchmark for evaluating learner competency and a critical component of the Malaysian Qualifications Framework, especially in technical fields such as finance. This study aimed to assess the attainment based on Program Learning Outcomes outlined by MQF 2.0. In particular, the study assessed four Program Learning Outcomes, namely PLO1, PLO2, PLO7, and PLO11 among 24 staff members who completed a Strategic Financial Management module. These outcomes reflect knowledge, cognitive ability, quantitative reasoning, and ethical professionalism, respectively. Using actual assessment scores, this study evaluates overall competency levels and performance across learners. Results indicate that learners achieved high competency across all four PLOs, with the strongest attainment in PLO1 and the lowest in PLO2. The study concludes that structured finance education aligned with MQF 2.0 contributes positively to competency development, supporting the need for continuous curriculum refinement to strengthen quantitative, analytical, and ethical financial decision-making capabilities among learners.
Keywords
Learning Outcome, MQF 2.0, Strategic Financial
Downloads
References
1. Alvarez, S., & Yáñez, R. (2018). Financial literacy and academic performance in business students. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(4), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bodie, Z., & Merton, R. C. (2014). Finance. Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Hussin, N. (2025). Assessing Performance in Talent Development Program through Learning Outcomes in Leadership Course. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(III), 2454-6186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Malaysian Qualifications Agency. (2020). Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF) 2.0. Putrajaya: MQA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Siddiqui, Q. (2020). Measuring learning outcome effectiveness in finance education. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(5), 821–836. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Williams, T., & Dobelman, J. A. (2017). Ethics in finance education: Developing reflective practitioners. Journal of Financial Education, 43(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria