Assessment of Risk Attitudes and Mitigation Strategies Among Arable Crop Farmers in Semi-Arid Makueni County, Kenya
Authors
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si, 24341 (Korea.)
Department of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State (Nigeria.)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000766
Subject Category: Agriculture
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 9384-9392
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-28
Accepted: 2025-11-03
Published: 2025-11-24
Abstract
This study assessed risk attitudes and mitigation strategies of arable crop farmers in Semi-Arid Makueni County, Kenya. A multi-stage sampling technique was adopted in the selection of 163 respondents. Data were collected using research questionnaire and analyzed using frequency distribution and percentages, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression, safety first model and a 5-point likert scale. The results revealed that the major types of risk faced by arable crop farmers are production (93.3%) and climatic (89.6%), followed by market (74.2%), financial (66.9%) and institutional (50.9%) risks; about 65.6% of farmers were risk-averse, 23.9% risk-neutral and 10.4% risk-seeking. The OLS model indicated that education, farming experience, farm size and access to credit significantly influenced farmers’ economic performance while risk attitude coefficient had a negative effect. The result also showed that the farmers adopted low-cost, experience-based strategies (crop diversification, intercropping, drought-tolerant varieties and soil and water conservation), however, uptake of formal instruments like crop insurance (11%) remained low. The study concludes that smallholder farmers in semi-arid Kenya are highly risk-averse and rely on adaptive strategies grounded in social capital and indigenous knowledge and recommended strengthening agricultural extension, access to affordable credit and insurance literacy.
Keywords
Arable crop, Kenya, Makueni, Risk attitude
Downloads
References
1. Abdulai, A., & Huffman, W.E. (2014). The adoption and impact of soil and water conservation technology: An endogenous switching regression application. Land Economics, 90(1), 26 – 43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Asule, P.A., Musafiri, C.M., Nyabuga, G., Kiai, W., & Ngetich, F.K. (2023). Determinants of simultaneous use of soil fertility information sources among smallholder farmers in the Central Highlands of Kenya. Agriculture, 13(9), 1729. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Carter, M.R., Cheng, L., & Sarris, A. (2019). Where and how index insurance can boost the adoption of improved agricultural technologies. Journal of Development Economics, 136, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chantarat, S., Mude, A.G., Barrett, C.B., & Carter, M.R. (2013). Designing index-based livestock insurance for managing asset risk in northern Kenya. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 80(1), 205–237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Feder, G., Just, R.E., & Zilberman, D. (2019). Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 30(1), 255–298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2023). Gender and Climate Risk Management in Smallholder Agriculture in East Africa. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hardaker, J.B., Lien, G., Anderson, J.R., & Huirne, R.B. (2015). Coping with Risk in Agriculture: Applied Decision Analysis (3rd ed.). CABI Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). (2022). Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2022. Nairobi: KNBS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Makueni County Government. (2025). Makueni County Integrated Development Plan (2025–2030). Nairobi: County Government of Makueni. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Musyoki, M.E., Busienei, J.R., Gathiaka, J.K., & Karuku, G.N. (2022). Linking Farmers’ Risk Attitudes, Livelihood Diversification and Adoption of Climate Smart Agriculture Technologies in the Nyando Basin, Kenya. Heliyon, 8(4), 93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Mwangi, M., Mucheru-Muna, M., & Pypers, P. (2021). Drivers and constraints to adoption of integrated soil fertility management technologies among smallholder farmers in Kenya. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 76(3), 240–249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Nyang’au, I.M., Bett, E.K., & Lagat, J.K. (2020). Determinants of smallholder farmers’ participation in climate risk management strategies in Kenya. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 6(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
- Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
- Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
- Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
- The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District