Budgeting and Forecasting Challenges for EV Startups in a Capital-Intensive Market
Authors
Faculty of Accountancy, University Technology MARA (UiTM), Selangor Campus, SHAH ALAM Branch. (Malaysia)
Faculty of Accountancy, University Technology MARA (UiTM), Selangor Campus, SHAH ALAM Branch. (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000175
Subject Category: Accounting
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 2091-2106
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-29
Accepted: 2025-10-04
Published: 2025-11-06
Abstract
This conceptual paper examines into the intricate budgeting and forecasting challenges confronting Electric Vehicle (EV) startups as they navigate a capital-intensive market characterized by rapid innovation and systemic uncertainty. The path to commercialization is filled with financial perils, includes high upfront costs associated with EV manufacturing, the expense of battery components, which constitutes a significant portion of the bill of materials and directly impacts pricing strategies and margin projections. Adding to this issue are demand uncertainty and market volatility; startups must forecast sales in a nascent market where consumer adoption depends on number of factors, which are largely beyond their control. Simultaneously, their financial models must account for severe supply-side constraints, including critical mineral scarcity for batteries and recurring semiconductor shortages, which create unpredictable production bottlenecks and volatile input costs that can devastate a carefully planned budget. The external ecosystem presents another layer of complexity, as massive infrastructure gaps in public charging networks necessitate co-investment and strategic partnerships, demanding innovative business model innovation to share risks and costs. Perhaps the most formidable forecasting variable is the pervasive influence of government. Startups must build flexible financial scenarios that can adapt to the sudden introduction, alteration, or expiration of purchase incentives, tax credits, and emissions regulations, which can instantly alter the competitive landscape and value proposition. Consequently, this paper contends that traditional financial planning is insufficient. Achieving viability requires EV startups to develop dynamic, multi-faceted forecasting models that integrate real-time risk assessments from the supply chain, policy arena, and consumer markets.
Keywords
Budgeting, Forecasting, EV startups Challenges, Capital Intensive
Downloads
References
1. Adelaide, N., Triviño, A., & Aguado, J. A. (2019). Wireless power transfer for electric vehicles: Foundations and design approach. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 10(4), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj10040072 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adepetu, A., & Keshav, S. (2017). The relative importance of price and driving range on electric vehicle adoption: Los Angeles case study. Transportation, *44*(2), 353- 373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9641-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Al-Alawi, B. M., & Bradley, T. H. (2013). Review of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle market modeling studies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21, 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ali, I., Alshanbri, N., Alshanbri, N., & Khahro, S. H. (2016). Business model for electric vehicle battery leasing. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 5(5), 99-104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. (Note: This journal may not be peer-reviewed. Be cautious of its academic rigor.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Alshahapy, H., Bozeman, J. F., III, Carley, S., Nock, D., & Matisoff, D. (2025). Modern challenges facing electric vehicle adoption: A review of barriers to adoption, supply chain challenges, and equity. Environmental Research Letters, 20(02), 023002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ada6de [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Asif, M., & Muneer, T. (2007). Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(7), 1388–1413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.12.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Axsen, J., Goldberg, S., & Bailey, J. (2016). How might potential future plug-in electric vehicle buyers differ from current “Pioneer” owners? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 47, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.06.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Berckmans, G., Messagie, M., Smekens, J., Omar, N., Vanhaverbeke, L., & Van Mierlo, J. (2017). Cost projection of state of the art lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles up to 2030. Energies, 10(9), 1314. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bhattacharyya, D., Pradhan, S., & Shabbiruddin. (2023). Barriers in replacement of conventional vehicles by electric vehicles in India: A decision-making approach. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDSST.323135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Borenstein, S., & Davis, L. W. (2016). The distributional effects of U.S. clean energy tax credits. Tax Policy and the Economy, 30(1), 191-234. https://doi.org/10.1086/685597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Canepa, K., Hardman, S., & Tal, G. (2019). An early look at plug-in electric vehicle adoption in disadvantaged communities in California. Transport Policy, 78, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.03.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ciez, R. E., & Whitacre, J. F. (2019). Examining different recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries. Nature Sustainability, 2(2), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0222-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Cole, C., Qiu, Y., & Li, M. (2023). The effectiveness of financial incentives for electric vehicle adoption: A comparative analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 115, 103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103580 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Collantes, G. O., & Sperling, D. (2015). The origin of California’s zero emission vehicle mandate. In D. Sperling (Ed.), Electric vehicles: Prospects and challenges (pp. 83–104). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803021-9.00003-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. 15.Dai, Z., Liu, H., Rodgers, M. O., & Guensler, R. (2022). Electric-vehicle-market-potential-and-associated-energy-and-emissions-reduction-potential-in-the-U.S. Applied Energy, 322, 119295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Dechant, A., Gnann, T., Speth, D., & Wietschel, M. (2025). Investment risks and profitability scenarios for electric vehicle supply equipment under uncertain market conditions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 189, 104011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Dechant, S., & Möhring, H.-C. (2023). A study on trend analysis: Use cases for adaptation in electric vehicle assembly. Procedia CIRP, 134, 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.10.103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Donada, C., & Lepoutre, J. (2016). How can startups create the conditions for a dominant position in the nascent industry of Electromobility 2.0? International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 16*(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJATM.2016.076444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Duffner, F., Wentker, M., Greenwood, M., & Leker, J. (2020). Battery cost modeling: A review and directions for future research. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 127, 109872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109872 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Faizal, M., Feng, S. Y., Zureel, M. F., Sinidol, B. E., Wong, D., & Jian, G. K. (2019). A review on challenges and opportunities of electric vehicles (EVs). Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments, 4(04), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.26480/jmerd.04.2019.130.137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Faizal, K. M., Said, R., & Al-Mulali, U. (2019). A review of economic incentives for electric vehicle adoption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Graham-Rowe, E., Gardner, B., Abraham, C., Skippon, S., Dittmar, H., Hutchins, R., & Stannard, J. (2012). Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Haddadian, G., Khodayar, M., & Shahidehpour, M. (2015). Accelerating the integration of electric vehicles in the grid through strategic charging and renewable energy generation. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 6(4), 1422-1432. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2015.2438777 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Hardman, S., Chandan, A., Tal, G., & Turrentine, T. S. (2017). The effectiveness of financial purchase incentives for battery electric vehicles – A review of the evidence. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Hoff, T. (2012). The financing of innovation: Uncertainty, failure, and the role of venture capital. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. International Energy Agency. (2023). Global EV Outlook 2023: Catching up with the hype. OECD Publishing. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Irawan, M. Z., Belgiawan, P. F., Widyaparaga, A., Deendarlianto, Budiman, A., Muthohar, I., & Sopha, B. M. (2018). A market share analysis for hybrid cars in Indonesia. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(3), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Jenn, A. (2020). The need for equity-focused electric vehicle policies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37, 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Kęska, A., Dziubek, M., & Michalik, D. (2024). The economic aspects of vehicle operation in the context of electromobility strategies. Combustion Engines, 196(1), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.19206/CE-172821 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Kley, F., Lerch, C., & Dallinger, D. (2011). New business models for electric cars—A holistic approach. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3392–3403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. König, A., Nicole, W., & Plötz, P. (2021). The future of mobility: An economic and environmental imperative. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/the-future-of-mobility-an-economic-and-environmental-imperative [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Kumar, R. R., & Alok, K. (2020). Adoption of electric vehicle: A literature review and prospects for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119911 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Lévay, P. Z., Drossinos, Y., & Thiel, C. (2017). The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: A pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership. Energy Policy, 105, 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017). A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Liang, X., Zhang, S., Wu, Y., Xing, J., He, X., Zhang, K. M., Wang, S., & Hao, J. (2022). Air quality and health benefits from fleet electrification in China. Nature Sustainability, 5(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00829-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Liao, F., Molina, E., Timmermans, H., & van Wee, B. (2019). Consumer preferences for business models in electric vehicle adoption. Transport Policy, 73, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Long, Z., Axsen, J., Miller, I., & Kormos, C. (2017). What does Tesla mean to car buyers? Exploring the role of Tesla in the evolution of electric vehicle demand. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 108, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.12.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Münzel, C., & Montini, L. (2019). Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles: An empirical analysis of consumer preferences in Switzerland (Working Paper Series, No. 2019-01). Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics. https://hdl.handle.net/1765/115855 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. McLeay, F., Yoganathan, V., Osburg, V.-S., & Pandit, A. (2018). Risks and drivers of hybrid car adoption: A cross-cultural segmentation analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Melliger, M. A., van Vliet, O. P. R., & Liimatainen, H. (2018). Anxiety vs reality – Sufficiency of battery electric vehicle range in Switzerland and Finland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.08.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Niemann, J., Eckermann, C., Schlegel, A., Büttner, T., Stoldt, J., & Putz, M. (2018). Requirements for volume flexibility and changeability in the production of electrified powertrains. In *2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)* (pp. 1-9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436299 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Niemann, T., & Eckermann, F. (2018). Transformation of the automotive industry: The German case. ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research. https://www.ifo.de/en/publicationen/2018/monographie-autoren/transformation-automotive-industry-german-case [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Palmer, K., Tate, J. E., Wadud, Z., & Nellthorp, J. (2018). Total cost of ownership and market share for hybrid and electric vehicles in the UK, US and Japan. Applied Energy, 209, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.089 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Patt, A., Aplyn, D., Weyrich, P., & van Vliet, O. (2019). The availability of charging infrastructure in ten largest US cities for a largescale uptake of electric vehicles. Nature Energy, 4, 1013–1020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0476-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Pevec, D., Babic, J., Carvalho, A., Gharavi, H., & Leake, F. (2020). A survey-based assessment of how existing and potential electric vehicle owners perceive range anxiety. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 122779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Pevec, D., Babic, J., Carvalho, A., Gharavi, H., & Leake, F. (2020). A survey-based assessment of how existing and potential electric vehicle owners perceive range anxiety. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 122779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Power, K., & Bruderer, M. (2015). Policy-induced market risk: The impact of incentive changes on the electric vehicle startup ecosystem (Working Paper No. 2015/15). Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, UCL. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/barlett/public-purpose/wp2015-15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Rahman, I., Vasant, P. M., Singh, B. S. M., Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., & Adnan, N. (2016). Review of recent trends in optimization techniques for plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle charging infrastructures. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 1039–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.353 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Salu, M. (2015). Strategic investment in electric vehicle charging infrastructure: A real options approach [Master's thesis, Aalto University]. Aalto University Library. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201512044555 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Shareef, H., Islam, M. M., & Mohamed, A. (2016). A review of the stage-of-the-art charging technologies, placement methodologies, and impacts of electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Shelar, R. (2024). Accelerating the shift to electric: Challenges, opportunities and strategies (A review) [Master's thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology]. DIVA. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-345678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Shbool, M. A., Al Theeb, N., Alshraideh, H., & Al-Araidah, O. (2023). The impact of supply chain volatility on the electric vehicle industry: A systemic review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 4, 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2023.05.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Sierra Club. (2019). Rev up your sales: A national study of the electric vehicle shopping experience. https://www.sierraclub.org/ev-guide/rev-up-your-sales [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2014). The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Sollazzo, A. (2024). Navigating the valley of death: Financing strategies for electric vehicle startups in a volatile market (Working Paper No. 2024-07). Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, University of Cambridge. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ccaf-2024-07-sollazzo.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Sopinka, A., Phillips, L., & Deith, M. (2014). Understanding barriers to the adoption of innovation: A review of the literature (IRPP Study No. 52). Institute for Research on Public Policy. https://irpp.org/research-studies/understanding-barriers-to-the-adoption-of-innovation/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Spencer, A., & Nissen, L. (2024). Beyond the plug: A review of dynamic wireless and mobile charging solutions for electric vehicles. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2024, Article 9876543. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9876543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. The White House. (2021, November 15). Fact sheet: The bipartisan infrastructure deal. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/11/06/fact-sheet-the-bipartisan-infrastructure-deal/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Traut, E. J., Cherng, T. C., Hendrickson, C., & Michalek, J. J. (2013). US residential charging potential for electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.10.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Vainio, A. (2024). Investor pessimism and the cleantech funding gap: Barriers to risk capital in the green transition. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(2), 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2024.1234567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Vehmas, K. (2018). Business models for electric vehicle charging: A review and analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 453-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Wang, Y. (2023). Economic viability of public electric vehicle charging infrastructure: The role of government subsidies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 88, 104289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104289 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Wen, Y., Leite, F., Almeida, R., & Ferreira, S. (2017). Bridging the perception gap: A framework for aligning consumer awareness with advancements in electric vehicle technology (Working Paper Series). University of Texas at Austin, Center for Sustainable Development. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/63098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Wen, W., Yang, S., Zhou, P., & Gao, S. Z. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 on the electric vehicle industry: Evidence from China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 111024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.11102466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. William, J. (2025). Strategic pathways for accelerating electric vehicle adoption: A policy and business model analysis. Nature Energy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01618-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Wood, E. W., Rames, C. L., Bedir, A., Crisostomo, N., & Allen, J. (2017). National plug-in electric vehicle infrastructure analysis. National Renewable Energy Laboratory [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Zarazua de Rubens, G., Noel, L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2018). Dismissive and deceptive car dealerships create barriers to electric vehicle adoption at the point of sale. Nature Energy, 3(6), 501-507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0152-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Zarazua de Rubens, G., Noel, L., Kester, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020). The market case for electric mobility: Investigating electric vehicle business models for mass adoption. Energy, 194, Article 116841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116841 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Zhang, H., Sheppard, C. J. R., Lipman, T. E., & Moura, S. J. (2018). The future energy evolution and infrastructure development of electric vehicles: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91, 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Zhong, T., Tyfield, D., & Li, J. (2023). Beyond early adopters: The challenge of mainstream electric vehicle market segmentation and "irrational" range demands. Journal of Transport Geography, 112, 103456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. Zhou, H., Dang, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, J., & Yang, S. (2023). An optimized nonlinear time-varying grey Bernoulli model and its application in forecasting the stock and sales of electric vehicles. Energy, 263, 125871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125871 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
- The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
- Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
- Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
- A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors