Career Maturity among UniSZA Students

Authors

Mohd Sani Ismail

Faculty of Islamic Comtemporary Studies, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Norhashimah Yahya

Faculty of Islamic Comtemporary Studies, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Nor Faridah Mat Nong

Faculty of Islamic Comtemporary Studies, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Siti Hajar Mohamad Yusoff

Faculty of Islamic Comtemporary Studies, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Zuraidah Juliana Mohamad Yusoff

Faculty of Islamic Comtemporary Studies, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu (Malaysia)

Siti Salina Abdullah

Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (Malaysia)

Nurul Anwar

Universitas Hamzanwadi. Lombok, NTB (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.930000016

Subject Category: Counselling Psychology

Volume/Issue: 9/30 | Page No: 121-126

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-10

Accepted: 2025-12-16

Published: 2025-12-25

Abstract

The persistent disjunction between tertiary education and the demands of the modern workforce casts a long, unsettling shadow over the prospects of countless graduates. A significant proportion of university leavers, including those from institutions like UniSZA, grapple with a distinct lack of readiness for professional life—a deficit arguably rooted in an underdeveloped sense of career maturity. This study employed a mixed-methods research design encompassing quantitative and qualitative approaches. The quantitative phase involved a survey using the Career Maturity Inventory–Revised (1995), translated into Malay and validated as the Malay Revised Inventori Kematangan Kerjaya (1995). The sample comprised 1,000 UniSZA students, including 500 male and 500 female participants, selected using systematic sampling. This paper presents a critical conceptual analysis that systematically re-examines existing vocational development theories in light of contemporary socioeconomic realities. The findings of the study indicate that independent-samples t-test results reveal a statistically significant difference in career maturity based on students’ gender, while the overall level of career maturity among UniSZA students is at a moderate level. The analysis further identifies interrelated conceptual dimensions as central to understanding career maturity among UniSZA students: the persistent tension between individual career aspirations and the strong influence of familial career scripts. Future interventions must pivot from generic skills training towards targeted, culturally sensitive strategies that address these deeply embedded, context-specific factors, truly preparing students for the rigours of post-graduation life.

Keywords

Career readiness, vocational development

Downloads

References

1. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–483. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Betz, N. E., & Luzzo, D. A. (1996). Career assessment and the Career Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(3), 313–325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Choudhuri, K. M., Hassan, K., & Kamaluddin, Z. (2016). Parental influence on career choice among Malaysian undergraduate students. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 101-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creed, P. A., Patton, W., & Prideaux, L. (2002). Career maturity and career decision-making difficulties in high school students. Journal of Career Development, 29(2), 119–131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Guichard, J. (2005). Life-long self-construction. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 5(2), 111–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Luzzo, D. A., James, T., & Luna, M. (2000). Effects of career development course on the career decisionmaking self-efficacy and career maturity of college students. Journal of College Student Development, 41(2), 173–180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mohd Rasdi, M. S., Yaacob, A. A., & Zakaria, R. (2011). Graduate employability in Malaysia: Challenges and way forward. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(19), 309-314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Othman, M., Abdul Hamid, M., & Hassan, S. (2014). Career decision making difficulties among Malaysian public university students. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(1), 109-118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Patton, W., & McMahon, M. (2014). Career development and systems theory: Connecting theory and practice (3rd ed.). Sense Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Salleh, K. M., & Yahaya, A. (2011). Career choice factors of university students in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 2(3), 202-211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 42–70). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16 (3), 282–298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Tang, M., & Su, X. (2020). Cultural context and career decision-making self-efficacy: A review of crosscultural studies. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(1), 159-173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles