Challenges and Barriers in Tahfiz Education for the Visually Impaired in Malaysia
Authors
Fakulti Pengajian Kontemporari Islam, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)
Fakulti Pengajian Kontemporari Islam, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)
Fakulti Pengajian Kontemporari Islam, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)
Hussein Ali Abdullah Al-Thulaia
Fakulti Pengajian Kontemporari Islam, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)
Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Al-Haddar
Fakulti Pengajian Kontemporari Islam, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000239
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 2987-2994
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-12
Accepted: 2025-10-18
Published: 2025-11-08
Abstract
Tahfiz education for the visually impaired (People with Disabilities - OKU) is increasingly gaining attention in contemporary Islamic education discourse, but its implementation still faces various challenges. This study aims to examine critical issues in tahfiz education for the visually impaired (OKU) in Malaysia based on an analysis of interviews with subject matter experts. The methodology of this study uses a qualitative approach with semi-structured interviews followed by reflexive thematic analysis. The analysis results indicate that there are five main issues hindering the effectiveness of inclusive tahfiz education. The five issues are: the absence of a feeder system at the secondary level, rigid entry requirements of tahfiz institutions, misalignment between the Malaysian Braille mushaf and the Madinah’s mushaf, a shortage of trained specialist teachers in Braille Qur'anic pedagogy, and a societal mindset that still underestimates the potential of visually impaired students. Although policies such as the Zero Reject Policy and the Action Plan for Religious Agencies for Muslim Persons with Disabilities 2024–2028 have been established, their implementation at the institutional level is still not comprehensive. The discussion found that these issues are closely related to the structure of the education system, weaknesses in teacher training, and the psychosocial challenges faced by students. The article outlines several important strategies, including developing clear educational pathways, providing alternative admission assessments for tahfiz institutions, standardizing the Braille mushaf, enhancing teacher training, and encouraging community advocacy. This study concludes with a recommendation to strengthen multi-agency collaboration among the government, JAKIM, tahfiz institutions, NGOs, and the private sector to successfully achieve truly inclusive and sustainable tahfiz education. These findings have important implications for the development of Islamic education policies in Malaysia and contribute to the global literature on Quranic education for the visually impaired community.
Keywords
Tahfiz Education, Visually Impaired Persons
Downloads
References
1. Ahmad, N., Wan Zahari, W. A. M., & Kirin, A. (2020). The implementation of Hadith studies for visually impaired people in Malaysia: Issues and challenges. Journal of Social Transformation and Regional Development, 2(3 Special Issue), 101–110. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.30880/jstard.2020.02.03.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Asmilyia, M. M., Noor, A. Y. M., & Dahnil, D. P. (2022). Problem Solving for Learning Disabilities in Malaysian Muslim Blind Community. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 21, 53-63. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.21.2022.222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Awang, A., Abdul Rani, I. F., & Kway, E. H. (2024). Special needs education for the visually impaired in Malaysia. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 13(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol13.2.9.2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. British Educational Research Association (BERA). (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (4th ed.). https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Gani, R. A. (2024). Learning methods of tahfizh Al-Qur’an in improving the quality of memorization of visually impaired students at Raudlatul Makfufin Islamic boarding school. Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia. https://jii.rivierapublishing.id/index.php/jii/article/view/5296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Iqbal, K. (2024). Status of Quranic education for visually impaired students in Pakistan: Teachers’ challenges. Journal of Academic Research in Humanities. https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia (JAKIM). (2024). Pelan Tindakan Agensi Agama Bagi Orang Kurang Upaya Muslim 2024–2028. Putrajaya: JAKIM. https://www.islam.gov.my/ms/e-penerbitan/4237-pelan-tindakan-agensi-agama-bagi-orang-kurang-upaya-muslim-2024-2028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Zero-Reject Policy: Malaysian inclusive education initiative. Putrajaya: KPM. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368489948_Zero_Reject_Policy_A_New_Pathway_of_Inclusive_Education_in_Malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. J., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Othman, I., Rahmat, B. S. ‘A., Bakar, B., Zamziba, M. N. F., Rasdi, M. N. A., & Othman, A. (2024). Effectiveness of ‘Abahata’ method for the visually impaired in learning Quran Braille: A pilot study. International Journal of Modern Education, 6(21). https://gaexcellence.com/ijmoe/article/view/481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Rabiṭah Ulama Iritriya. (2020). الإمام الشاطبي حياته ومؤلفاته [Imam al-Syatibi: Kehidupan dan Karya-karyanya]. https://ulamaaeritrea.org/675/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Rasdi, M. N. A., Jaafar, N., Abdul Aziz, N. A., & Sharuddin, S. A. (2024). Arising Issues Due to the Inconsistency Between the Pertis Braille Quran Text and the Mushaf al-Madinah Text. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 16(2s), 730. https://www.gbmrjournal.com/pdf/v16n2s/V16N2s-61.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Raus, H. N. M., Rasdi, M. N. A., Alias, N., Ibrahim, N., Khosim, N., & Jaafar, N. (2013). Pengajaran Al Quran Braille: Isu dan Cabaran Semasa. International Journal on Quranic Research (IJQR), 3(4), 79-94. https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/quranica/article/view/5198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Şahin, İ., & Kesik, F. (2019). A critical review of religious education policies and practices of Turkey from the perspective of inclusion. Education as Change, 23(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/3456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Taufik, A., Kurniawan, S., Ibrahim, A., & Abdullah, A. (2022). Preserving Qur’an through blind eyes: Self-regulation of blind people in memorizing the Qur’an. Journal of Disability & Religion, 26(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2022.2133788 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Tengku Puji, T. I. Z., Mohd Noor, A. Y., & Sabaruddin, S. N. A. (2015). Efforts to Elevate Al-Quran Study among the Visually Impaired Group in Malaysia: Challenges and Proposals. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6-S5), 419–424. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s5p419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). COREQ: A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. UNESCO. (2020). Inclusion and education: All means all. Global Education Monitoring Report. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Zulkifli, H., Rashid, S. M. M., Mohamed, S., Toran, H., Raus, N. M., & Suratman, M. N. (2022). Challenges and elements needed for children with learning disabilities in teaching and learning the Quran. Children, 9(10), 1469. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9101469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study