Collaborative Strategic Thinking: A War-Room Pedagogy for Teaching the Strategic Management
Authors
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Muhammad Zulqarnain Hakim Abd Jalal
Faculty of Science Computer and Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia)
YM Raja Amir Ashraf Raja Zainalabidin
UOA Academy, Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Universiti Poly-Tech (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.922ILEIID004
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/22 | Page No: 21-29
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-22
Accepted: 2025-09-30
Published: 2025-10-22
Abstract
Strategic Management is widely recognized as a capstone course in business education, designed to prepare undergraduates for decision-making in complex and uncertain environments. Yet, in many classrooms, teaching methods remain rooted in lectures, case studies, and group projects that often result in task-splitting rather than genuine collaboration. As a result, students may leave the course familiar with analytical tools. Yet, they remain less prepared for the messy, adaptive nature of real strategic work. This paper proposes the War-Room Pedagogical Framework (WRPF) as an alternative approach to teaching Strategic Management at the undergraduate level. Inspired by the intensity of organizational “war rooms,” the framework positions the classroom as a dynamic space where students formulate strategies, respond to shifting scenarios, and engage in structured debates with peers. Four guiding principles underpin the design: immersion, adaptation, debate, and reflection. By moving beyond static group work, WRPF encourages students to think collectively, challenge assumptions, and refine strategies in real time. The paper argues that this approach not only deepens engagement but also cultivates higher-order skills such as strategic agility, critical analysis, and collaborative leadership. It contributes conceptually by extending experiential learning into contexts of uncertainty and practically by offering educators a flexible model that can be adapted to case studies, simulations, or industry-based projects. In doing so, the WRPF provides a pathway for preparing graduates who are not only competent in using strategic frameworks but also capable of working together to navigate the unpredictable realities of business.
Keywords
WRPF, War-Room Pedagogical Framework, Strategic Management
Downloads
References
1. Åge, L.-J., & Eklinder-Frick, J. (2025). Strategic adaptability negotiation training in purchasing and supply management: A multi-method instructional approach. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1478409224000773 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Albert, S. (2020). Applied critical thinking in strategy: Tools and a simulation using a live case. Journal of Education for Business, 96(4), 252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1792395 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alzate, S. J. G., Sánchez, W. G. V., Espinal, F. E., Bustamante, J., & Arias-Arias, E. (2024). Tactical critical thinking program on the tactical efficiency index, declarative and procedural knowledge in male soccer players: a case study. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1469347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Andersen, T. J., Simeone, L., Drabble, D., Morelli, N., & Götzen, A. de. (2023). Interactive strategy-making: dynamic adaptation with links to design thinking and Theory of Change. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (p. 40). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803927718.00009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Berri, S. B. (2025). Self And Shared Regulation In Online Project-Based Learning with Upmr: A Case Study. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/3819/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chussil, M. J. (1996). Competitive intelligence goes to war: CI, the war college, and competitive success. Competitive Intelligence Review, 7(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.1002/cir.3880070310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Costigan, S. S., & Hennessy, M. A. (2024). Hybrid Threats and Hybrid Warfare Reference Curriculum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Daff, L., Tame, C., & Sands, J. (2024). A course design approach that encourages reflective practice habits. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(2), 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. David, M. E., David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2021). Closing the Gap between Graduates’ Skills and Employers’ Requirements: A Focus on the Strategic Management Capstone Business Course. Administrative Sciences, 11(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Fahey, L., & Saint‐Onge, H. (2024). A sensemaking approach to strategy making: The role of the leader in times of ambiguity. Organizational Dynamics, 53(3), 101027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2023.101027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hou, H. (2022). Augmented reality board game with multidimensional scaffolding mechanism: A potential new trend for effective organizational strategic planning training. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. LaBeouf, J. P., Griffith, J. C., & Roberts, D. (2016). Faculty and Student Issues with Group Work: What is Problematic with College Group Assignments and Why? Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v5n1a2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Lewis, R., Sutton, N., & Brown, D. A. (2023). How senior managers use interactive control to manage strategic uncertainties: An attention-based view. Management Accounting Research, 62, 100864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100864 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Lim, W. M. (2020). Reconsidering Capstones in Business Education. Journal of Education, 201(3), 267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057420914905 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Lin, W., Wang, J.-Y., & Yueh, H. (2022). Learning Information Ethical Decision Making With a Simulation Game. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Meganathan, P. M. (2024). Enhancing Student Engagement and Active Learning Through Student Presentation-Based Effective Teaching (Spet) Method Among Malaysian Undergraduate Students [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Moxie, J., Dahl, A. A., Fernandez-Borunda, A., & Partridge, H. (2025). Teamwork makes the dream work: group effectiveness in a “Paper Chase” collaborative writing exercise for higher education. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1405449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Neubert, M., Rams, W., & Utikal, H. (2020). Experiential learning with live case studies. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 11(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtcs.2020.109726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ober, T. M., Lehman, B., Gooch, R., Oluwalana, O., Solyst, J., Phelps, G., & Hamilton, L. S. (2023). Culturally Responsive Personalized Learning: Recommendations for a Working Definition and Framework. ETS Research Report Series, 2023(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12372 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Onwuzulike, O. C., Musonda, N. C., & Joseph, O. B. (2024). Impact of strategic management education on professional development: A longitudinal study. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(3), 323. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Perusso, A., & Baaken, T. (2020). Assessing the authenticity of cases, internships and problem-based learning as managerial learning experiences: Concepts, methods and lessons for practice. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100425 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Samaras, S., Adkins, C. L., & White, C. D. (2021). Developing critical thinking skills: Simulations vs. cases. Journal of Education for Business, 97(4), 270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1932703 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Veldyaeva, E., Fitz, L. R. G., & Scheeg, J. (2024). Gamifying IT Service Management Education for Future IT Professionals. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Werro, A., Nitzl, C., & Borghoff, U. M. (2025). On the role of intelligence and business wargaming in developing foresight. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2025.2506122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Winardy, G. C. B., & Septiana, E. (2023). Role, play, and games: Comparison between role-playing games and role-play in education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100527 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study