Comparative Effect of Digital and Print Reading Materials on Engagement and Comprehension among Young ESL

This systematic literature review investigates the comparative effects of digital and print reading materials on reading engagement and comprehension among young English as a Second Language (ESL) learners. As digital technologies become increasingly integrated into educational contexts, understanding the implications of different reading formats is vital for informed pedagogical decision-making. The review draws from peer-reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2024, sourced from major academic databases such as ERIC, Scopus, and Web of Science. An initial total of 32 journal articles and research papers were identified. Following the application of defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 studies were selected for final analysis. The findings show that digital reading formats often increase student interest because they are interactive and use multimedia, but print materials are better for helping students understand deeply because they are organized and have fewer distractions. Additionally, factors such as learner preferences, cognitive load, instructional design, and environmental context influence the outcomes of both formats. The review concludes that a balanced integration of digital and print materials, tailored to learners' needs and supported by guided instruction, may offer the most effective approach in ESL classrooms. Implications for educators and directions for future research are discussed.

digital reading materials, print reading materials

1. Abbas, S. G., Shaheen, F., & Mahjabeen, A. (2024). Investigating The Impact Of Digital Vs. Traditional Reading Habits On Comprehension And Engagement Among Middle School Students. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 4664–4672. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i6.7835Kuey [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdulrazzaq, D. M., Edan, M. A., & Heidarzadegan, N. (2024). An Exhaustive Examination of the Integration of Literature into Teaching/Learning Strategies for Advancing English Reading Comprehension: A Systematic Literature Review. ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews, 4(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.22515/elereviews.v4i1.7637ejournal.uinsaid.ac.id [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al Khazaleh, S. (2021). The Effect of Digital Reading on EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science, 1(1). https://ijets.org/index.php/IJETS/article/view/6IJETS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Seghayer, K. (2024). Comparative efficacy of digital and nondigital texts on reading comprehension and EFL learners’ perceptions of their merits. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1–31. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73589LLT Journal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bee Choo, Y. & Zainuddin, N.S. (2018). The Use of E-book to Improve Reading Comprehension among Year 4 Pupils. Journal of English Education, 3(1, May), 23-32. http://usnsj.com/index.php/JEE [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Day, S., Hwang, J. K., Arner, T., McNamara, D., & Connor, C. (2024). Choose Your Own Adventure: Interactive E-Books to Improve Word Knowledge and Comprehension Skills. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02496. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02496arXiv [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Elly Suhaila Waimin & Intan Farahana Kamsin (2025). Perception of Rural Primary School Students towards the Advanced Integrated NILAM System (AINS). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i3/24969 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hare, C., Johnson, B., Vlahiotis, M., Panda, E. J., Tekok‑Kilic, A., & Curtin, S. (2024). Children’s Reading Outcomes in Digital and Print Mediums: A Systematic Review. Journal of Research in Reading. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381484147 Children's reading outcomes in digital_and_print_mediums_A_systematic_review [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Huang, D.-L., Rau, P.-L. P., & Liu, Y. (2024). Which reading comprehension is better? A meta-analysis of the effect of paper versus digital reading in recent 20 years. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 14, 100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100142ScienceDirect+1PRESSto+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Huang, H.-C. (2014). Online Versus Paper-based Instruction: Comparing Two Strategy Training Modules for Improving Reading Comprehension. RELC Journal, 45(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214534797SAGE Journals [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Idris, M. Z., Ali, N. L., & Don, Y. (2024). Readability of Year 1 to Year 6 science textbooks in English in Malaysian primary schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 53–72. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386491042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. López-Escribano C, Valverde-Montesino S, García-Ortega V. The Impact of E-Book Reading on Young Children's Emergent Literacy Skills: An Analytical Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 16;18(12):6510. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126510. PMID: 34208785; PMCID: PMC8296384. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8296384/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mohamed Shuhidan, S. M., Nor, N. F. M., & Shah, P. M. (2022). The relationship between digital literacy and learning engagement among secondary school students. Journal of ICT in Education, 9(2), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mohd Zamri Azmi et al. (2017). NILAM Programme overview. Learn English with Unisel. Retrieved from https://englishwithunisel.wordpress.com/2017/10/11/reading-programmes-in-malaysia/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mustafah Hussain, S., & Mohamad, M. (2024). Developing reading comprehension modules for underprivileged ESL learners in Malaysian secondary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 45–60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378007345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nasrullah, N., & Amin, S. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review: The Effectiveness of English Amusement Exposures to Acquire the Language for ESL Learners. International Journal of Education, Culture and Technology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.69747/edu-ij.v1i1.37ojs.edupartner.co.id [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. National Library of Malaysia. (2023). Reading Profile of Malaysians 2022/2023. Retrieved from https://www.pnm.gov.my/pnm/resources/pdf%20file/PROBACA_ENGLISH.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Noordan, M. N. H., & Yunus, M. M. (2022). Using digital comprehension to improve reading comprehension skills among young learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/13208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pardede, P. (2019). Print vs Digital Reading Comprehension in EFL. Journal of English Teaching,5(2),79–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1266161.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pazilah, F. N., Kabilan, M. K., & Zahar, M. A. (2023). Exploring ESL pre-service teachers’ perceptions of 21st-century digital competencies. Journal of Language and Communication, 10(1), 12–26. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/9443 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ramli, N., Abu Bakar, N., & Tan, S. (2023). Exploring digital literacy among Malaysian and Chinese ESL/EFL postgraduates. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 25–39. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Examining-the-Need-for-Digital-Literacy-Skills-ESL-Mohd-Ramli/99833a4a2d47239332afac8fed67db4ab5be6c1a?utm_source=direct_link [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Roesnita, I. T., & Zainab, A. N. (2013). The pattern of e-book use among undergraduates in Malaysia: A case of to know is to use. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 18(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.5400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Saefatu, Y. I., Mustofa, A., & Retnaningdyah, P. (2023). EFL Students’ Perceptions of Digital Extensive Reading Program in Junior High School Level. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i2.354jurnaledukasia.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Salleh, N. M., & Yamat, H. (2021). Read and record: A reading fluency strategy for struggling ESL readers. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Shamshul, I. S. M., Ismail, H. H., & Nordin, N. M. (2023). Using Digital Technologies in Teaching and Learning of Literature in ESL Classrooms: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(4), 10. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.4.10IJLTER [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shafiei Ebrahimi, S. (2016). Effect of Digital Reading on Comprehension of English Prose Texts in EFL/ESL Contexts. International Journal of English Language & Literature Studies, 5(2), 111–117. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303584800 Effect of Digital Reading on Comprehension of_English_Prose_Texts_in_EFLESL_Contexts [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Yang, Y., & Hu, X. (2022). The impact of mobile-assisted reading on EFL learners’ cognitive load and comprehension. Digital Education Review, 41, 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yunus, M. M., Salehi, H., & John, D. S. (2013). Using visual aids as a motivational tool in enhancing students’ interest in reading literary texts. Asian Social Science, 9(15), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1305.6360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wan Mahzan, W. S., Ismail, H., & Eng, T. K. (2019). A needs analysis for developing digital vocabulary learning materials for indigenous ESL learners. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(1), 65–74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342494682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study