Deciphering the Drivers of Climate transparency in Malaysia: TCFD Perspective

The pressure to address climate change by stakeholders pushes business players to pledge their climate commitment via reporting and disclosure. This mechanism signals the firm's climate adaptation and mitigation efforts, projecting their environmental performance. The study aims to investigate the drivers of climate transparency among publicly listed firms in Malaysia, with a focus on the perspectives of financial strength and corporate governance. Climate transparency is assessed based on the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework, in parallel with Malaysia's regulatory requirements. By adopting a panel data analysis, the study found that leverage, firm size, and the adoption of innovation are significant drivers of climate transparency among firms in Malaysia. However, no significant relationship was found for profitability, sales growth, board independence, and CEO duality. The study provides valuable insights to help market players prepare for a compliance strategy as climate change reporting becomes mandatory in Malaysia in 2025 under the National Sustainability Reporting Framework.

Climate change reporting, Disclosure

1. Abdalla, A. A. A., Salleh, Z., Hashim, H. A., Zakaria, W. Z. W., & Rahman, M. S. A. (2024). The effect of corporate governance best practices on the quality of carbon disclosures among Malaysian public listed companies. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 19(2), 42-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Achenbach, M. (2021). Transparency of climate-related risks and opportunities: Determinants influencing the disclosure in line with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. Glocality, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/glo.32 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, Q., Salman, A., & Parveen, S. (2022). Evaluating the effects of environmental management practices on environmental and financial performance of firms in Malaysia: the mediating role of ESG disclosure. Heliyon, 8(12), e12486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bae Choi, B., Lee, D., & Psaros, J. (2013). An analysis of Australian company carbon emission disclosures. Pacific Accounting Review, 25(1), 58-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/01140581311318968 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ben‐Amar, W., & McIlkenny, P. (2015). Board effectiveness and the voluntary disclosure of climate change information. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 704-719. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. BM. (2015). Amendments relating to sustainability statement in annual reports. Malaysia: Bursa Malaysia Retrieved from https://www.bursamalaysia.com/sites/5bb54be15f36ca0af339077a/content_entry5ce3b5005b711a1764454c1a/5ce3c81c39fba2619023d12d/files/Appendix_1_MainLR_Sustainability_final__7Oct2015_.pdf?1570701455 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. BM. (2022). Amendments to the main market listing requirements in relation to Enhanced Sustainability Reporting framework. Bursa Malaysia: Bursa Malaysia Retrieved from https://www.bursamalaysia.com/sites/5bb54be15f36ca0af339077a/content_entry5c11a9db758f8d31544574c6/63312a2439fba20d86ba8e16/files/26Sept_2022_Bursa_Malaysia_Enhances_Sustainability_Reporting_Framework_With_New_Climate_Change_Reporting.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Borghei, Z. (2021). Carbon disclosure: A systematic literature review. Accounting & Finance, 61(4), 5255-5280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cavaciuti-Wishart, E., Heading, S., Kohler, K., & Zahidi, S. (2024). The Global Risks Report 2024. World Economic Forum Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Darus, F., Zuki, H. I. M., & Yusoff, H. (2019). The path to sustainability. European Journal of Management and Business Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Desai, R. (2022). Determinants of corporate carbon disclosure: A step towards sustainability reporting. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(5), 886-896. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dey, D. (2024). Overview of climate disclosures. British Actuarial Journal, 28, Article e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135732172300017X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dharma, F., Marimutu, M., & Alvia, L. (2024). Profitability and market value effect on carbon emission disclosures: The moderating role of environmental performance. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(3), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.15915 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Elsner, M., Atkinson, G., & Zahidi, S. (2025a). The Global Risks Report 2025. World Economic Forum Retrieved from https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2025.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Elsner, M., Atkinson, G., & Zahidi, S. (2025b). The Global Risks Report 2025. https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2025.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107-1125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Franco, E. G. (2020). The Global Risks Report 2020. World Economic Forum Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risk_Report_2020.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Franco, E. G., Kuritzky, M., Lukacs, R., & Zahidi, S. (2021). The Global Risks Report 2021. World Economic Forum Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Franco, E. G., Kuritzky, M., Lukacs, R., & Zahidi, S. (2022). The Global Risks Report 2022. World Economic Forum Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2022.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Giannarakis, G., Zafeiriou, E., Arabatzis, G., & Partalidou, X. (2018). Determinants of corporate climate change disclosure for European firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 281-294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Gulluscio, C., Puntillo, P., Luciani, V., & Huisingh, D. (2020). Climate change accounting and reporting: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(13), 5455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135455 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gutierrez, R., & Drukker, D. M. Citing references for Stata’s cluster-correlated robust variance estimates. In StataCorp. https://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/references/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis Pearson Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391-430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hassan, O. A., & Romilly, P. (2018). Relations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions: New insights. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 893-909. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. He, R., Luo, L., Shamsuddin, A., & Tang, Q. (2022). Corporate carbon accounting: a literature review of carbon accounting research from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement. Accounting & Finance, 62(1), 261-298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Heading, S., & Zahidi, S. (2023). The Global Risks Report 2023. World Economic Forum Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2023.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281-312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. IFRS. (2023). IFRS Foundation publishes comparison of IFRS S2 with the TCFD Recommendations. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2023/07/ifrs-foundation-publishes-comparison-of-ifrs-s2-with-the-tcfd-recommendations/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Jia, J., & Bradbury, M. E. (2021). Risk management committees and firm performance. Australian Journal of Management, 46(3), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896220959124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kong, Y., Agyemang, A., Alessa, N., & Kongkuah, M. (2023). The moderating role of technological innovation on environment, social, and governance (ESG) performance and firm value: Evidence from developing and least developed countries. Sustainability, 15(19), 14240. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914240 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Luo, L., Tang, Q., & Lan, Y. C. (2013). Comparison of propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries: A resource constraint perspective. Accounting Research Journal, 26(1), 6-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mavuri, S., Chavali, K., & Kumar, A. (2019). A study on imperative innovation eco system linkages to map Sustainable Development Goal 9. 2019 International Conference on Digitization (ICD), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mou, R., & Ma, T. (2023). A study on the quality and determinants of climate information disclosure of A-Share-Listed Banks. Sustainability, 15(10), 8072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108072 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Palmer, J. C., Wright, R. E., & Powers, J. B. (2001). Innovation and competitive advantage in small businesses: Effects of environments and business strategy. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 12(1), 30-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Polizzi, S., & Scannella, E. (2023). Corporate environmental disclosure in Europe: the effects of the regulatory environment. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-03-2023-0165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. v. d. (1995). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. 28(6), 128–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(95)99997-E [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Przychodzen, J., & Przychodzen, W. (2015). Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance–evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 253-263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. SCM. (2024). National Sustainability Reporting Framework. Securities Commission of Malaysia (SCM) Retrieved from https://www.sc.com.my/nsrf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Shaikh, I. (2022). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practice and firm performance: An international evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 218-237. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.16202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sultana, F. (2022). Critical climate justice. The Geographical Journal, 188(1), 118-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. UNEP. (2022). World headed for climate catastrophe without urgent action: UN Secretary-General. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/world-headed-climate-catastrophe-without-urgent-action-un-secretary-general [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Wahyuningrum, I. F. S., Ihlashul’amal, M., Utami, S., Djajadikerta, H. G., & Sriningsih, S. (2024). Determinants of carbon emission disclosure and the moderating role of environmental performance. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2300518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wang, Q. (2023). Financial effects of carbon risk and carbon disclosure: A review. Accounting & Finance, 63(4), 4175-4219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press. https://ipcid.org/evaluation/apoio/Wooldridge%20-%20Cross-section%20and%20Panel%20Data.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Yu, M. (2023). CEO duality and firm performance: A systematic review and research agenda. European Management Review, 20(2), 346-358. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Yusoff, H., Kamaruddin, S. H., & Ghani, E. K. (2018). Environmental reporting practices of top public listed companies: analyzing pre-post corporate social responsibility framework. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 2(1), 50-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria