Digital Tax Administration Systems and Revenue Collection Performance in Rwanda (2012-2024)
Authors
Masters of Science in Taxation, Faculty of Economics, Social Sciences and Management Department of Entreprise Management, INES-Ruhengeri (Rwanda)
Masters of Science in Taxation, Faculty of Economics, Social Sciences and Management Department of Entreprise Management, INES-Ruhengeri (Rwanda)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000270
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 3308-3323
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-12
Accepted: 2025-10-19
Published: 2025-11-10
Abstract
The effects of the digital tax administration systems on revenue performance in Rwanda, specifically on eBilling Machines’ (EBMs) and electronic tax portals, form the focus of this study. Using a mixed methods approach involving survey of 100 tax payers and practitioners and quantitative analysis through the SPSS Version 24, it aimed at providing empirical evidence on the performance, challenges, and potentials of digital tax tool in the Rwandan context. The findings show that the majority of businesses had adopted the digital tax system, with 100% of respondent businesses having EBMs, and 80% proving familiar with such digitally-driven tax platforms. Over half of the respondents (54%) admitted that digital systems improved revenue performance, and roughly 67% agreed that EBMs are very effective in lowering tax evasion. The two aspects that respondents were very positive about the digital systems were improvements in transparency (79%) and operational efficiency (66%). On the contrary, there are many other challenges: poor internet connectivity (24%), lack of training (16%), and technical failure (16%) are wearing down the optimal use of such systems. While arguably positive in compliance behavior, the study concludes that digital tax transformation in Rwanda still has substantial implementation gaps that require targeted interventions. Improvement in areas like provision of sufficient professional support, development of digital infrastructure, simplification of user interfaces, and refinements of vague tax provision are among the proposed recommendations.
Keywords
Digital tax administration, Electronic Billing Machines
Downloads
References
1. World Bank. (2018). The World Bank Annual Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Blahušiaková, M. (2023). Business process automation–new challenges to increasing the efficiency and competitiveness of companies. Strategic Management-International Journal of Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management, 28(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Conner, M. (2020). Theory of planned behavior. Handbook of sport psychology, 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cooper, D. &. (2014). EBOOK: Business research methods. McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption. 205(219), 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. (2008). Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: An empirical research. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), 159-175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2007). Knowledge management in 21st century manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 45(11), 2391-2418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Igbinenikaro, E., & Adewusi, O. A. (2024). Tax havens reexamined: the impact of global digital tax reforms on international taxation. World Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 5(02), 001-012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Jensen, M. C. (1983). Organization theory and methodology. Accounting review, 319-339. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Juswanto, W., & Simms, R. (2017). Fair Taxation in the Digital Economy. ABD Institute. Policy Brief, (5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Juswanto, W., & Simms, R. (2017). Fair Taxation in the Digital Economy. ABD Institute Policy Brief, (5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Lipniewicz, R. A. (2017). Tax administration and risk management in the digital age. Information Systems in Management, 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mandola, V. I. (2013). Factors influencing the adoption and use of integrated tax management system by medium and small taxpayers in Nairobi Central Business District, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Mutinda, T. (2020). Factors Influencing Turnover Tax collection among Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Sector in Westland Area in Nairobi, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, KESRA/JKUAT). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Night, S., & Bananuka, J. (2020). The mediating role of adoption of an electronic tax system in the relationship between attitude towards electronic tax system and tax collection. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 25(49), 73-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Robertson, T. S. (1967). The process of innovation and the diffusion of innovation. Journal of marketing, 31(1), 14-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Saunders, M. L. (2009). Research methods for business students. Pearson education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Schmölders, G. (1959). Fiscal psychology: A new branch of public finance. National Tax Journal, 12(4), 340-345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Sons., Ernst & Young LLP. (2016). Ernst & Young Tax Guide 2017. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L. (2008). Faculty perceptions of problems with merit pay plans in institutions of higher education. Journal of Business and Management, 14(1), 43-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Wambongo, C. D. (2019). Influence of online tax filing on tax collection among small and medium enterprises: a case study of Nairobi central business district. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Uwitonze, J. & Tuyisenge, J. (2021). The Impact of Electronic Billing Machines on VAT Compliance in Rwanda. Rwanda Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Mugenzi, P., Niyigena, D., & Habimana, J. (2020). Challenges of E-Tax Systems on SMEs in Rwanda: A Case of Kigali City. East African Journal of Business and Economics, 12(1), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Rurangwa, A. (2022). Digital Tax Administration and Taxpayer Compliance in Rwanda: A Behavioral Perspective. University of Rwanda Research Papers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Wani, T. A., & Ali, S. W. (2015). Innovation diffusion theory. Journal of general management research, 3(2), 101-118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Zachary, J. M. (2017). Tax collection cost and tax payment by small and medium enterprises in Embu County, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(3), 206-219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar