Divergent Histories: Narrative Asymmetry in French and English History Curricula in Canada

What happens when students in the same country learn markedly different versions of its past? This article examines divergent narratives in French- and English-language history curricula across six Canadian provinces outside Québec. Drawing on a comparative analysis of Grades 7–11 curriculum documents and critical discourse analysis of key expectations and rationales, it identifies persistent asymmetries in how francophone minority histories are represented… or omitted. French-language curricula tend to foreground resistance, community survival, and political agency, whereas English-language curricula frequently marginalise or dilute episodes such as the Conquest (1759), Regulation 17, and the legacy of Louis Riel. These contrasts are not merely lexical; they organise different distributions of agency, responsibility, and visibility, with significant consequences for how students learn to imagine who belongs to the national “we”. To capture this structural imbalance, the article develops the concept of narrative asymmetry in bilingual curriculum ecosystems and argues that such curricular inequity undermines both bilingualism and civic pluralism. The discussion then explores the identity and pedagogical implications of these asymmetries, showing how they shape francophone and anglophone students’ sense of recognition, legitimacy, and historical understanding. The article concludes by outlining avenues toward narrative equity in history education through curriculum reform, teacher education, and historical-thinking pedagogy, and suggests how this framework might be adapted to other multilingual societies grappling with tensions between official narratives and marginalised histories.

History education, Curriculum studies

1. Alberta Learning. (n.d.). Social studies K–12: Program of studies. Alberta Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bouchard, G. (2017). Interculturalism: A view from Quebec (H. Scott & P. Brennan, Trans.). University of Toronto Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bouvier, F. (2008). Bilan du débat relatif au programme Histoire et éducation à la citoyenneté du deuxième cycle de l’ordre d’enseignement secondaire qui a eu cours au Québec en 2006–2007. Québec, Canada : Gouvernement du Québec, Commission de consultation sur les pratiques d’accommodement reliées aux différences culturelles. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. British Columbia Ministry of Education. (n.d.). Social studies 9 curriculum. British Columbia Ministry of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brunet, M.-H., & Gani, R. (2023). Représentations divergentes dans les curriculums canadiens d’histoire: La francophonie comme enjeu politique et éducatif. Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 46(1), 54–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cardinal, L. (2005). The limits of bilingualism in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423905040060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chouinard, S., & Wallner, J., (2023). Nation-building and curriculum in Canada. In Education, curriculum and nation-building, 149–172, Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dallaire, C., & Denis, C. (2005). Asymmetrical hybridities: Youths at Francophone Games in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 30(2), 143–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Demers, S. (2017). Pourquoi enseigner l’histoire? Pourquoi l’apprendre? Un regard critique sur les visées du nouveau programme d’histoire du Québec et du Canada au secondaire. In M.-A. Éthier, V. Boutonnet, S. Demers, & D. Lefrançois (Eds.), Quel sens pour l’histoire? Analyses critiques du nouveau programme d’histoire du Québec et du Canada (pp. 81–93). Saint-Joseph-du-Lac, Canada : M Éditeur. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dépelteau, M. (2025, June 23). Les jeunes anglophones et francophones n’apprennent pas la même histoire. Francopresse. https://francopresse.ca/education/2025/06/23/les-jeunes-anglophones-etfrancophones-napprennent-pas-la-meme-histoire/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Di Giovanni, A., & Parker, L. (2024). It is a choice? Examining neoliberal influences in three Ontario education reforms. Critical Education, 15(2), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v15i2.186892 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Duquette, C., Pageau, L., & Tremblay, M.-L. (2023). The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada Calls to Action in initial history education: Where do we stand? Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 20(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.25071/1916-4467.40757 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Duquette, C., Monney, N., & Fontaine, S. (2020). Québec’s History of Québec and Canada ministerial examination: A tool to promote historical thinking or a hurdle to hinder its inclusion? In C. W. Berg & T. M. Christou (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of history and social studies education (pp. 323–354). New York, NY : Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Durham, J. G. (1839/2006). Lord Durham’s report: Text abridged by Gerald M. Craig (G. M. Craig, Ed.). McGill-Queen’s University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Éthier, M.-A., Boutonnet, V., Demers, S., & Lefrançois, D. (Eds.). (2017). Quel sens pour l’histoire? Analyses critiques du nouveau programme d’histoire du Québec et du Canada. Saint-Joseph-du-Lac, Canada : M Éditeur. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Éthier, M.-A., Lefrançois, D., & Demers, S. (2013). An analysis of historical agency in Quebec history textbooks. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 8(2), 119–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Gibson, L., Peck, C. L., Miles, J., & Duquette, C. (2025). Historical thinking: Trends, critiques, and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 65, 102088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102088 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hamman-Ortiz, L., & Palmer, D. (2023). Identity and two-way bilingual education: Considering student perspectives: Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26(1), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Karn, S., Llewellyn, K. R., & Clark, P. (2024). Decolonizing History Curricula Across Canada: Recommendations for (Re)design. Canadian Journal of Education Revue Canadienne De l’éducation, 47(4), 1090–1121 doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.6583 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lefrançois, D., & Demers, S. (2011). The Quebec History and Citizenship Education Curriculum and the Benchmarks of Historical Thinking (BHT): Convergence and divergence. Vancouver, Canada : Centre for the Study of Historical Consciousness, University of British Columbia. Retrieved from https://historicalthinking.ca/research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Létourneau, J. (2014). Je me souviens ? Le passé du Québec dans la conscience de sa jeunesse. Fides. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lévesque, S. (2017). History as a “GPS”: On the uses of historical narrative for French Canadian students’ life orientation and identity. London Review of Education, 15(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.2.07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Luoma, M. (2024). Public education, multinational citizenship, and territorial legitimacy: analyzing the 2004 and 2023 Ontario curricula on Indigenous peoples. Front. Polit. Sci. 6:1478530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1478530 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Manitoba Education and Early Childhood Learning. (n.d.). Grade 9 social studies: Canada in the contemporary world. Manitoba Education and Early Childhood Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ministère de l’Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur. (2017). Programme de formation de l’école québécoise. Histoire du Québec et du Canada. Québec, Canada : Gouvernement du Québec. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport. (2007). Programme de formation de l’école québécoise. Histoire et éducation à la citoyenneté, deuxième cycle du secondaire. Québec, Canada : Gouvernement du Québec. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. New Brunswick Department of Education. (n.d.). Social studies 9: Canadian identity curriculum. New Brunswick Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2018a). The Ontario curriculum: Social studies, Grades 1 to 6; History and geography, Grades 7 and 8. Government of Ontario. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2018b). The Ontario curriculum, Grades 9 and 10: Canadian and world studies. Government of Ontario. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ricœur, P. (2000). La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli. Éditions du Seuil. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (n.d.). Social studies 9 curriculum. Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The Big Six historical thinking concepts. Nelson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Taylor, C. (1994). Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (A. Gutmann, Ed.). Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Thériault, J.-Y. (2007). Francophonies minoritaires au Canada : Nouveaux paradigmes sociopolitiques. In L. Cardinal & M. Lapointe (Eds.), Une citoyenneté en mutation (pp. 33–48). Presses de l’Université Laval. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Vezina, A. C. (2023). A comparative analysis of Quebec and Ontario: How each province approached elementary provincial numeracy curricula and corresponding Faculty of Education accredited teacher education programs during the period of 2003–2018 (Doctoral dissertation, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study