E-Commerce and Market Access for Small United States of America Manufacturers: Review of Digital Platform Integration and Growth Outcomes
Authors
International Business School, Brandeis University Waltham (USA)
Department of Marketing, Heritage Polytechnic Eket Akwa Ibom (Nigeria.)
Department of Global Business, Sejong University Seoul (South Korea)
Faculty Law, Business and Tourism, University of Sunderland, Sunderland (UK)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.915EC00762
Subject Category: Public Health
Volume/Issue: 9/15 | Page No: 1461-1469
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-28
Accepted: 2025-11-03
Published: 2025-11-19
Abstract
E-commerce is transforming how small and medium-sized manufacturers (SMMs) in the United States access markets and sustain competitiveness. Drawing on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Business Survey, International Trade Administration, and Bureau of Labor Statistics, this review synthesizes evidence on digital adoption trends, employment outcomes, and export performance. The findings reveal that while large manufacturers still dominate online sales, digital adoption among small firms has accelerated, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic. Firms that adopt e-commerce experience faster revenue growth, stronger job creation in logistics and IT, and higher export participation rates than offline peers. Yet, barriers persist for microenterprises, including limited capital, digital skills shortages, and cyber-security concerns. Framed within the Diffusion of Innovations, Ecosystem Dynamics, and Labor Market Transition theories, this study shows that digital adoption is a systemic driver of inclusive industrial growth. Policy interventions should prioritize digital infrastructure, workforce development, and export-support programs that integrate e-commerce into national competitiveness strategies.
Keywords
Digital adoption; export participation; policy interventions
Downloads
References
1. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Autor, D., & Salomons, A. (2018). Is automation labor-displacing? Productivity growth, employment, and the labor share. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2018(1), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2018.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Autor, D., Mindell, D., & Reynolds, E. (2022). The work of the future: Building better jobs in an age of intelligent machines. MIT Task Force on the Work of the Future. https://workofthefuture.mit.edu/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bartik, A., Cullen, Z., Glaeser, E., Luca, M., & Stanton, C. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(30), 17656– 17666. 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox. NBER Working Paper 24001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Cong, L., Li, Y., & Wang, T. (2021). Digital platforms and small business resilience during COVID-19. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 16, e00289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00289 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. International Trade Administration. (2023). Digital tools and U.S. small and medium-sized exporters. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.trade.gov/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Nguyen, T., Malone, T., & Johnson, S. (2021). Digital adoption and firm resilience: Evidence from manufacturing and service industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(6), 1549–1572. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtab023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), & World Trade Organization (WTO). (2020). Digital trade and SMEs. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/20743190 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Pew Research Center. (2023). Small businesses, digital adoption, and online sales: Survey findings. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Pew Research Center. (2024). Cybersecurity, regulation, and digital adoption in small firms. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Small Business Administration. (2022). Small business digital adoption and employment outcomes. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy. https://advocacy.sba.gov/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Small Business Administration. (2023). Small business digital adoption and resilience: Advocacy report. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy. https://advocacy.sba.gov/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. U.S. Census Bureau. (2022). E-Stats 2022: Measuring the electronic economy. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. U.S. Census Bureau. (2022a). 2022 Economic Census: Manufacturing e-commerce tables. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. U.S. Census Bureau. (2023a). Quarterly retail e-commerce sales report. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. U.S. Census Bureau. (2025). Quarterly e-commerce report: Retail indicator series. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. World Bank. (2021). Digital transformation of SMEs: Lessons from global best practices. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Tribal Child Nutrition and Health in District of Sundargarh: A Public Health Review of ICDS Intervention
- Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Towards Prostate Cancer Screening Amongst Men Aged 40-60 Years in The Buea Health District: A Cross-Sectional Study
- Compliance with JCI Protocols: A Focus on Employee Safety
- Influence and Involvement of Teachers in Menstrual Hygiene Management of Female Secondary School Students in Kogi State, Nigeria
- A Critical Evaluation of Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana in Bihar