Educational Strategies for Enhancing AI Literacy among Nursing Students: A Systematic Review

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly entering nursing education and practice, yet AI literacy among nursing students remains uneven, with gaps in foundational knowledge, ethical reasoning, and applied clinical judgment.
Objective: To synthesize educational strategies that enhance AI literacy among nursing students and identify outcome patterns, barriers, and implementation enablers to inform curriculum, assessment, and policy.
Methods: A systematic literature review (2015–2025) was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and ERIC. English-language, peer-reviewed studies focusing on pre- or post-licensure nursing students and reporting AI-related educational outcomes were included. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data into a structured matrix, and appraised quality using CASP (qualitative) and JBI (quantitative/mixed-methods) tools. Narrative and thematic synthesis was used to integrate findings.
Results: Of 364 records identified, 47 duplicates were removed; 317 titles/abstracts were screened, 63 full texts were sought (60 assessed), and 28 studies met inclusion. Four pedagogical themes emerged: (1) simulation-based learning using AI-enabled or GenAI-supported scenarios; (2) online/blended modules for scalable foundational concepts; (3) problem-/case-based learning (PBL/CBL) to situate AI within clinical reasoning and communication; and (4) cross-disciplinary/policy approaches aligning competencies, assessment, and governance. Across diverse settings, interventions improved knowledge, confidence/readiness, and higher-order thinking. Transfer to clinical judgment was strongest for PBL/CBL and simulation with structured debriefs. Recurrent barriers included limited faculty readiness, student anxiety about AI’s impact on nursing identity, infrastructural constraints (devices/connectivity), and uneven treatment of ethics, bias, and accountability. Studies rarely measured longitudinal behavior change or patient-centered outcomes.
Conclusions: AI literacy is achievable at scale when foundations are delivered via blended learning, transfer is secured through PBL/CBL, and safe practice is consolidated through simulation and guided debriefing—underpinned by robust assessment, faculty development, equitable infrastructure, and clear policy for human-in-the-loop accountability. Future research should adopt standardized measures and longitudinal designs to link classroom gains to clinical behaviors and patient outcomes.

nursing education; artificial intelligence

1. Alqaissi, N., & Qtait, M. (2025). Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers regarding the integration of artificial intelligence in nursing and health sciences education: A systematic review. SAGE Open Nursing, 11, 23779608251374185. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251374185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amankwaa, I., Ekpor, E., Cudjoe, D., & Kobiah, E. (2025). Patterns, advances, and gaps in using ChatGPT and similar technologies in nursing education: A PAGER scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 78, 103861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.103861 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Batran, M., Al-Hadid, L., & Al-Momani, M. (2025). Perceptions of AI use among intensive care unit nurses: A cross-sectional study. Nursing Open, 12(1), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cant, R. P., & Cooper, S. J. (2017). Simulation-based learning in nurse education: Systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 49, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Foronda, C., Fernandez-Burgos, M., Nadeau, C., Kelley, C. N., & Henry, M. N. (2020). Virtual simulation in nursing education: A systematic review spanning 1996 to 2018. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 33, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.05.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gouda, A. D. K., Sorour, M. S., & Mahmoud, M. A. (2025). Simulation strategies for increasing AI knowledge and acceptance among nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 79, 103880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.103880 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 38, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.05.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ibrahim, A. (2025). Nurses’ risk–benefit perceptions of AI adoption: A Saudi Arabian perspective. International Nursing Review, 72(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.70033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jadhav, R. (2025). Case-based learning with AI support enhances evidence-based practice literacy in nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Nursing Education, 64(3), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20250214-03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2021). US faculty and administrators’ experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning, 25(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2518 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kgwadi, B., Moeti, K., & Leburu, M. (2025). Digital readiness for AI integration in nursing education in Botswana. African Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 27(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/20455599.2025.111234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Li, Y., Chen, H., & Zhang, X. (2025). Using machine learning to predict compassion fatigue in operating room nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 34(7–8), 1234–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Martin, B., & Reid, M. (2025). Prevalence and integration of AI in prelicensure nursing programs in the US. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 16(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnur.2025.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. McBride, S., & Tietze, M. (2018). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge for AI in healthcare. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 36(11), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Porter, A., & Foronda, C. (2024). Enhancing AI literacy in nursing education to combat embedded biases. Nursing Education Perspectives, 45(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ronval, P., Moreau, J., & Lefevre, T. (2025). Teaching tabular AI literacy through TAGAL: An experimental study among health students. Nurse Education Today, 132, 106120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. J. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shah, M. (2025). Nursing undergraduates’ perceptions of AI chatbots for learning: A Malaysian study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 14, 128. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_128_25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Shishehgar, S., & Murray-Parahi, P. (2025). Artificial intelligence in health education and practice: A systematic review of students’ and academics’ perceptions. International Nursing Review, 72(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.70045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Simms, R. C. (2025). Generative AI literacy in nursing education: A call to action. Nurse Education Today, 133, 106155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Song, D., Zhang, P., Zhu, Y., Qi, S., Yang, Y., & Gong, L. (2025). Effects of generative AI on higher-order thinking skills and AI literacy in nursing undergraduates. Nurse Education in Practice, 79, 103876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.103876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Subaşi, D. Ö., & Sümengen, A. A. (2025). Pediatric nurses’ perspectives on AI applications: Literacy levels and attitudes. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(5), 1350–1362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sümengen, A. A., Subaşi, D. Ö., & Cakir, G. N. (2025). Nursing students’ attitudes and literacy toward artificial intelligence: A cross-sectional study. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 20(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.12.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Topaz, M., & Pruinelli, L. (2017). Big data and nursing: Implications for AI-driven decision support. Nursing Outlook, 65(5), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.03.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Trimaille, C., Dubois, M., & Renard, A. (2025). Faculty barriers to integrating AI in nursing education: A national survey in France. Nurse Education Today, 134, 106158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Watson, J. (2025). Nurses’ evolving role in AI-assisted critical care: A review. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 71, 103350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103350 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zhao, Y., Yuan, Y., Wen, Z., & Li, J. (2025). Undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes, and challenges of AI use in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1527842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1527842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Zhong, C., Yang, H., & Liu, Z. (2025). Artificial intelligence in nursing workforce regulation: Policy implications. Journal of Nursing Management, 33(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13982 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Zhou, F., Liu, Y., & Wang, H. (2025). Machine learning models to predict delirium in older patients: Implications for nursing education. Geriatric Nursing, 46, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.01.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study