Effect of Cooling Variation in Core and Cavity Temperatures on Volumetric Shrinkage in the Plastic Injection Moulding Process

Plastic injection moulding (PIM) is a widely used manufacturing process for producing high-precision plastic components. Among various process parameters thermal condition particularly core and cavity temperatures and their respective cooling rates significantly affect the volumetric shrinkage of moulded parts. Non-uniform cooling due to imbalanced temperature profiles can lead to percentage volumetric shrinkage, causing residual stresses, dimensional inaccuracies, and warpage. This study investigates the effects of core temperature, cavity temperature, and cooling time on volumetric shrinkage in the injection moulding process. A statistical approach using Design of Experiments (DOE) based on the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to analyze the relationships and interactions among these parameters. The results indicate that core temperature has the most significant parameter influence on volumetric shrinkage, followed by cavity temperature. However, cooling time alone showed minimal statistical impact. However, a notable interaction between core temperature and cooling time was observed, suggesting a synergistic effect on volumetric shrinkage behavior. Optimization of process parameters yielded optimal settings of 15 °C core temperature, 60.45 °C cavity temperature, and 12.5 s cooling time. These conditions reduced percentage volumetric shrinkage to 36.59%, significantly improving part dimensional stability. The predictive model demonstrated high accuracy, with an average differential of only 1.43% compared to experimental results. These findings highlight the critical role of thermal management and parameter interactions in minimizing volumetric shrinkage in plastic injection moulding.

Plastic injection moulding, volumetric shrinkage, core temperature, cavity temperature

1. Aronoff, S., (1989). Geographic Information Systems: A Management Perspective. Ottawa: WDL Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Gaspar-Cunha, J. Melo, T. Marques, and A. Pontes, “A review on injection molding: Conformal cooling channels, modelling, surrogate models and multi-objective optimization,” Polymers, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 919, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. R. Farooque, M. Asjad, and S. J. A. Rizvi, “A current state of art applied to injection moulding manufacturing process: A review,” Materials oday: Proceedings, vol. 43, pp. 441–446, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Karagoz, “An effect of mold surface temperature on final product properties in the injection molding of high-density polyethylene materials,” Polymer Bulletin, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 2627–2644, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. M. Coca-Gonzalez and M. Jimenez-Martinez, “Warpage: Causes, manufacturing processes and future challenges: A review,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L: J. Mater. Des. Appl., vol. 239, no. 6, pp. 1201–1217, 2025.C. V. Isaza, J. C. Posada, M. D. Sierra, A. J. Castro-Caicedo, and J. F. Botero-Cadavid, “Analysis of residual stress of injected plastic parts: A multivariable approach,” Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, vol. 18, pp. 43–58, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. properties of injection-molded polypropylene,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 22, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. W. Guo, T. Lu, F. Zeng, X. Zhou, W. Li, H. Yuan, and Z. Meng, “Multi-objective optimization of microcellular injection molding process parameters to reduce energy consumption and improve product quality,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 134, no. 11, pp. 5159–5173, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. C. Vargas-Isaza, A. Benitez-Lozano, and J. Rodriguez, “Evaluating the cooling efficiency of polymer injection molds by computer simulation using conformal channels,” Polymers, vol. 15, no. 20, p. 4044, 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. N. B. Guerra, T. M. Reis, T. Scopel, M. S. de Lima, C. A. Figueroa, and A. F. Michels, “Influence of process parameters and post-molding condition on shrinkage and warpage of injection-molded plastic parts with complex geometry,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 128, no. 1–2, pp. 479–490, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. D. Annicchiarico and J. R. Alcock, “Review of factors that affect shrinkage of molded part in injection molding,” Mater. Manuf. Process., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 662–682, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. N. Y. Zhao, J. Y. Lian, P. F. Wang, and Z. B. Xu, “Recent progress in minimizing the warpage and shrinkage deformations by the optimization of process parameters in plastic injection molding: A review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 85–101, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. P. Zengeya, K. Mao, and V. Goodship, “The effects of cooling rate (mould temperature) on HDPE gears produced through injection moulding,” Wear, vol. 530, p. 205000, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. M. Mohan, M. N. M. Ansari, and R. A. Shanks, “Review on the effects of process parameters on strength, shrinkage, and warpage of injection molding plastic component,” Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Li, Y. C. Ong, and W. M. Wan Muhamad, “Optimization design of injection mold conformal cooling channel for improving cooling rate,” Processes, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 1232, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. G. Hiyane-Nashiro, M. Hernández-Hernández, J. Rojas-García, J. Rodriguez-Resendiz, and J. M. Álvarez-Alvarado, “Optimization of the reduction of shrinkage and warpage for plastic parts in the injection molding process by extended adaptive weighted summation method,” Polymers, vol. 14, no. 23, p. 5133, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Bagalkot, D. Pons, D. Symons, and D. Clucas, “The effects of cooling and shrinkage on the life of polymer 3D printed injection moulds,” Polymers, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 520, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Y. Murata and R. Kanno, “Effects of heating and cooling of injection mold cavity surface and melt flow control on properties of carbon fiber reinforced semi-aromatic polyamide molded products,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 587, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. D. Godec, F. Panđa, M. Tujmer, and K. Monkova, “Molded part warpage optimization using inverse contouring method,” Polymers, vol. 17, no. 17, p. 2278, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. G. Gumono, Z. J. AR, A. Sujatmiko, and C. Adityaca, “The effect of heating and cooling media temperature on injection molding products shrinkage,” Asian J. Sci. Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 79–89, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. H. Oktem and D. Shinde, “Determination of optimal process parameters for plastic injection molding of polymer materials using multi-objective optimization,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 8616–8632, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Massah, N. J. Jam, and E. Soury, “Experimental and numerical investigation of injection molding main parameters’ effects on shrinkage and warpage of a thin sheet made of HDPE,” Int. J. Adv. Des. Manuf. Technol., vol. 15, no. 3, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. H. M. Lazim, M. S. Jusoh, M. S. F. Ahamad, and A. Ghani, “Optimization of warpage defects using the Taguchi method: A failure analysis in plastic injection molding,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 867–877, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Study on Utilisation on Vidiyal Payanam with Special Reference to Udumalpet
• Influence of Sales Promotional Strategies on Water Purifier Purchase: A Study
• Voluptatem exercitat
• Beatae voluptatum eanfjnjfnjnj
• Analysis of Marketing Strategies in Newbridge College During Covid-19 Pandemic