Effect of Performance Task and Peer Testing Assessment Modes on Senior Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Practical Geography in Region Five, the Gambia

Authors

Ebrima Saine

University of Education (Gambia)

Manjie Sambou

University of Education (Gambia)

Sulayman Ceesay

University of Education (Gambia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000718

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 8815-8823

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-29

Accepted: 2025-11-06

Published: 2025-11-21

Abstract

In this quasi-experimental study, 90 senior secondary Gambian students' academic performance in practical geography was examined in relation to performance tasks and peer testing assessments. The Performance Task group received the highest post-test scores, followed by the Peer Testing group, while the Traditional Method control group received the lowest. The results showed a significant effect of assessment type. In the Peer Testing group, there was a significant gender gap that favoured men, but not in the Performance Task group. The experimental groups showed increased motivation and engagement, according to qualitative data. The study, which draws its conclusions from constructivism and self-determination theory, concludes that performance tasks are very successful and suggests incorporating them into the geography curriculum in addition to teacher preparation programs and additional research on gender dynamics in group settings.

Keywords

Performance Task, Peer Testing, Practical Geography

Downloads

References

1. Dakpoe, J. (2019). Practical geography: The role of fieldwork. Journal of Geography Education, 12(3), 45-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2013). Beyond the bubble test: How performance assessments support 21st-century learning. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ene, C., Obi, M., & Nwosu, C. (2025). Peer assessment strategies and student motivation in higher education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 15(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Eshun, F., Korwu, F., & Appiah, K. (2024). Collaborative learning and creativity in graphic design education: The role of peer assessment. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 43(1), 78–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. El-Senousy, W. (2020). Interactive peer assessment and teamwork in technology-based learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology, 12(3), 214–229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hsu, T., Chen, C., & Hwang, G. (2020). Effects of mobile peer-assessment-based learning on students’ achievement and motivation in vocational education. Computers & Education, 156, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ministry of Basic and Secondary Education. (2018). Education sector policy 2016–2030. Government of The Gambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mutwarasibo, F. (2016). University students’ experiences of peer assessment in academic writing in Rwanda. Journal of Language and Education, 2(4), 35–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Njiku, J. (2018). Peer observation and reflective teaching among Tanzanian student-teachers in mathematics education. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 14(1), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Pan, Y., Hung, C., & Truong, T. (2024). Emotional and cognitive profiles of teachers during curriculum reform: Implications for collaboration and self-efficacy. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 25(2), 155–170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. UNESCO. (2015). Education for all 2000-2015: Achievement and challenges. EFA Global Monitoring Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Yu, F. (2011). Interactive peer assessment and student engagement in online learning environments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(7), 883–900. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles