Emotional Orientation, Emotional Disconnectedness, and Marital Bonding: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study of Married Couples in Muzaffarabad, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan

Authors

Shaiba Arooj

Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)

Lukman Z. M.

Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000453

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 5536-5542

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-22

Accepted: 2025-10-28

Published: 2025-11-15

Abstract

Marriage remains a fundamental institution sustaining social stability, yet its success largely depends on the quality of emotional exchanges between spouses. This study examines the effects of emotional orientation and emotional disconnectedness on marital bonding within a South Asian context. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 700 married respondents in Muzaffarabad using structured Likert-scale questionnaires. The measures assessed emotional orientation, emotional disconnectedness, disagreement, emotional well-being, and marital bonding, each operationalized as the mean of multiple indicators. Data was analyzed using chi-square tests, Pearson’s correlations, and multiple regression in SPSS. Results revealed significant associations among the variables. Emotional orientation was positively correlated with marital bonding (r = .10, p < .01), whereas emotional disconnectedness and disagreement were negatively correlated (r = –.20, p < .01; r = –.88, p < .01). Regression analysis indicated that emotional disconnectedness was the strongest negative predictor of marital bonding (β = –.44, p < .001), while emotional orientation emerged as a positive predictor (β = .28, p < .001). The overall model explained 6% of the variance in marital bonding, F(2, 697) = 21.47, p < .001. These findings underscore the critical role of emotional processes in sustaining marital ties, with emotional withdrawal exerting a stronger negative effect than the positive influence of emotional orientation. The study contributes to existing literature by offering empirical evidence from Pakistan, where marital expectations are shaped by collectivist norms and socio-cultural obligations. Practical implications highlight the need for marital counseling interventions that reduce emotional withdrawal while promoting positive emotional orientation to strengthen spousal bonds.

Keywords

Marital Relationship Quality, Emotional Orientation

Downloads

References

1. Abdullah, T., Haq, A.U., & Khan, M.I. (2023). Work–family conflict and emotional well‑being among policewomen in Pakistan. Annals of Social Sciences and Perspective, 4(2), 331-340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akram, Z., & Khan, S.Y. (2020). Tracing the determinants of marital quality in Pakistani society through the lens of How It Happened. Global Language Review, 5(2), 115–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, M.A., & Saleem, S. (2022). Family communication and marital satisfaction: A mediating role of emotion regulation. Rawal Medical Journal, 47(3), 677-680. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arshad, A., & Imran, H. (2022). Partner phubbing, romantic jealousy and marital satisfaction among married individuals. Applied Psychology Review, 1(2), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ayub, N., Iqbal, S., Halford, W.K., & van de Vijver, F. (2023). Couples relationship standards and satisfaction in Pakistani couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 49(1), 111-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14(1), 130–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou (R.G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. (Original work published 1923) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Caughlin, J.P., & Huston, T.L. (2002). Demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 9(1), 95-119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chadha, L., Sharma, P., Kaur, R., Arya, I., & Sharma, P. (2025). The impact of social media addiction on self-esteem and life satisfaction among married couples. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 14(4), 1494-1501. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Farooq, Z., Akhtar, N., & Zacchilli, T. (2024). Validation of Romantic Partner Conflict Scale (RPCS) in Pakistani married couples: Establishing measurement invariance. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 18(1), 79–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fincham, F.D., & Beach, S.R.H. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 630–649. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gottman, J.M., & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work: A practical guide from the country’s foremost relationship expert. New York: Three Rivers Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gottman, J.M., & Schwartz-Gottman, J. (2022). The love prescription: Seven days to more intimacy, connection, and joy. New York: Penguin Life. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jolin, S., Lafontaine, M.-F., Lussier, Y., & Brassard, A. (2022). How relationship satisfaction and negative communication trajectories change in emerging adults’ dating relationships: a group-based dual trajectory analysis. Emerging Adulthood, 11(2), 482-496. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lebow, J., & Snyder, D.K. (2022). Couple therapy in the 2020s: Current status and emerging developments. Family Process, 61(4), 1359-1385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lu, L., Wilder, S., & Prager, K.J. (2025). Intimacy reduces withdrawal after conflict in cohabiting couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(6), 1102-1123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Markman, H.J., & Rhoades, G.K. (2012). Relationship education research: Current status and future directions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 169–200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Meier, T., Otero, M., Su, S.X., Stephens, J.E., Yu, C.W., & Haase, C.M. (2024). Unraveling the experience of affection across marital and friendship interactions. Affective Science, 6(1), 104-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mosley, M.A., Yoshida, N.R., & Turner, F.A. (2025). Communication is key: The mediating effect of demand–withdraw patterns on partner phubbing and couple satisfaction. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 51(3), e70053. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Choudary, S.S., Khan, M.L., & Atta, N. (2024). Emotional distress, communication patterns and relationship dissatisfaction among married couples. Research Journal for Societal Issues, 6(3):01-22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ni, N., Ahrari, S., Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Zarean, M., & Roslan, S. (2025). A meta-analytic study of partner phubbing and its antecedents and consequences. Frontier in Psychology, 13(16), 1561159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Second Edition. California: University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nugrahani, A., Prameswari, Y., & Napitupulu, R.P.A. (2025). Dual-earner dynamics: how emotional intimacy shields marital satisfaction from role conflict. The Family Journal, 28(7), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rahman, K.U., Islam, M., & Khan, K. (2023). An empirical examination of work-life balance in dual-career couples in Pakistan: A qualitative approach. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 5(1), 122–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rathgeber, M., Bürkner, P.C., Schiller, E.M., & Holling, H. (2019). The efficacy of emotionally focused couples therapy and behavioral couples therapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 45(3), 447-463. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rosen, N. O., Dubé, J. P., Bosisio, M., & Bergeron, S. (2025). Do demand-withdrawal communication patterns during sexual conflict predict couples’ relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and sexual distress? An observational and prospective study. Journal of Sex Research, 62(5), 787–799. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Shujja, S., & Adil, A. (2024). Affectivity and satisfaction in the relationship of Pakistani couples is mediated by dyadic coping-based gratitude. PsyCh Journal, 13(2), 287-294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Simpson, J.A., & Rholes, W.S. (2017). Adult attachment, stress, and romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wang, X., & Zhao, K. (2023). Partner phubbing and marital satisfaction: The mediating roles of marital interaction and marital conflict. Social Science Computer Review, 41(4), 1126-1139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles