Enhancing Experiential Learning Through Service Learning in Malaysian Higher Education

Service learning has become a significant pedagogical approach in Malaysian higher education, enabling students to integrate theoretical knowledge with authentic community engagement. Grounded in Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) and aligned with the Service-Learning Malaysia–University for Society (SULAM) framework, service learning facilitates the development of project management, communication, and leadership competencies while promoting civic responsibility and social inclusion.
This study examines how structured service-learning initiatives can enhance experiential learning outcomes and foster sustainable community partnerships. Quantitative and qualitative methods were employed to evaluate participant feedback, student reflections, and project implementation outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze satisfaction and perceived impact, while potential inferential approaches—such as t-tests or correlations—are discussed as tools for exploring differences across demographic groups. A thematic analysis framework (Braun & Clarke, 2006) guided the interpretation of qualitative responses, revealing key themes such as teamwork development, cultural awareness, and empowerment.

Service learning, experiential learning, community engagement, Orang Asli

1. Ang, M. Z., Hashim, R., & Sani, M. N. (2024). Experiential learning through community engagement: The impact of SULAM on student leadership development in Malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Celio, C. I., Durlak, J. A., & Dymnicki, A. B. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34(2), 164–181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Kolb’s experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. Journal of Geography, 99(5), 185–195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ibrahim, N., Latib, N. A., & Amin, S. M. (2023). Empowering Indigenous communities through higher education partnerships: Lessons from Malaysian universities. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jacoby, B. (2014). Service-learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lessons learned. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). The experiential educator: Principles and practices of experiential learning. Experience Based Learning Systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2019). Service-Learning Malaysia–University for Society (SULAM) Framework. Putrajaya: MOHE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nicholas, C. (2019). The Orang Asli and the contest for resources: Indigenous politics, development, and identity in Peninsular Malaysia. IWGIA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rahim, R., & Omar, N. (2022). Embedding SULAM in higher education: Enhancing student learning through community partnership. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(3), 312–327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rahman, F., & Hashim, R. (2021). Community engagement and Indigenous empowerment: A Malaysian perspective. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 14(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sandmann, L. R., Saltmarsh, J., & O’Meara, K. (2008). Creating academic homes for the engaged scholar: Institutional strategies. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(4), 47–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Saud, M. S., Rahman, N. H., & Noraini, A. (2023). SULAM initiatives and their impact on student employability skills: A Malaysian perspective. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Subramaniam, P. (2020). Education and empowerment among Orang Asli: Challenges and opportunities. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(6), 101–111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tanchoco, P. M., & Cabigon, M. D. (2023). Advancing service-learning in ASEAN: A framework for intercultural and ethical engagement. ASEAN Journal of Education, 14(2), 25–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. UNESCO. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A roadmap. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wurdinger, S. D., & Carlson, J. A. (2010). Teaching for experiential learning: Five approaches that work. Rowman & Littlefield. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Yusoff, M. A., & Halim, F. A. (2024). Integrating Indigenous knowledge in service-learning for sustainability education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(1), 111–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar