Entrepreneurial Resilience of Shadow Education Entrepreneurs: A Mini Review Article

Authors

Nur Syazwani Hamid

Faculty of Management and Economics, Sultan Idris Education Universiti, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak (Malaysia)

Hariyaty Ab. Wahid

Faculty of Management and Economics, Sultan Idris Education Universiti, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.927000010

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/27 | Page No: 76-83

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-12

Accepted: 2025-11-21

Published: 2025-11-26

Abstract

This mini review explores the role of entrepreneurial resilience among shadow education entrepreneurs, who offer private supplementary tutoring in volatile, competitive educational markets. Resilience is defined as the capacity to adapt, recover, and innovate in the face of adversity. This quality has become increasingly vital due to the challenges posed by regulatory reforms, changing parental expectations, digital disruption, and crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. A thorough literature search was conducted using Scopus and Google Scholar up to 25 August 2025, employing Boolean search strings and keywords such as ‘entrepreneurial resilience,’ ‘shadow education,’ ‘business challenges,’ and ‘innovation.’ Eligible studies included original research, systematic reviews, case studies, and meta-analyses published in English that explicitly referenced entrepreneurial resilience in shadow education. Grey literature and non-English sources were excluded. Findings indicate that entrepreneurial resilience manifests through strategies such as digital adoption, service diversification, and emotionally intelligent leadership, enabling entrepreneurs to sustain learning continuity, safeguard employment, and foster pedagogical innovation. COVID-19 accelerated digitalfirst models, highlighting both the opportunities of adaptive technologies and persistent challenges such as financial precarity, inequitable access, and concerns over data ethics. While resilience provides clear benefits, debates remain over whether it should be framed primarily as individual adaptability or as a collective, systemic response shaped by socio-economic and policy contexts. Gaps in cross-cultural research, long-term technological evaluation, and attention to psychological well-being suggest the need for deeper inquiry. Strengthening resilience will require collective infrastructures, equitable policy frameworks, and ethical integration of digital tools, ensuring sustainability and inclusivity in the evolving landscape of shadow education.

Keywords

entrepreneurial resilience, shadow education

Downloads

References

1. Altinay, L., Toros, E., Vatankhah, S., & Seyfi, S. (2026). Women entrepreneurs as cultural custodians in tourism: A social feminism theory perspective. Tourism Management, 112, 105267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amato, M., Coppola, A., Furno, M., & Verneau, F. (2025). Gender disparities in agricultural entrepreneurship: evidence from Italy using FADN data. Agricultural and Food Economics, 13(1), 1-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Branca, E., Intenza, M., & Doni, F. (2025). Startup entrepreneurs’ personality traits and resilience: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. unveiling the interplay of prior experience. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 21(1), 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ganuthula, V. R. R. (2025). AI-enabled individual entrepreneurship theory: redefining scale, capability, and sustainability in the digital age. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ho, D. B., Duong, C. D., Tran, M. L., Luong, T. S., & Tran, T. P. H. (2025). Big data analytics powered by artificial intelligence and entrepreneurial resilience: A moderated mediation model of technological turbulence and business innovation model. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 100611. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hokmabadi, H., Rezvani, S. M., & de Matos, C. A. (2024). Business resilience for small and medium enterprises and startups by digital transformation and the role of marketing capabilities—A systematic review. Systems, 12(6), 220. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ike, O. O., Okwuchukwu, E. I., & Eyisi, D. C. (2025). Enhancing economic sustainability through entrepreneurial alertness as a mediator between innovativeness, proactive personality, and entrepreneurial intention among undergraduate students. Discover Psychology, 5(1), 56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kai Liao, Y., Wu, W. Y., Dao, T. C., & Ngoc Luu, T. M. (2021). The influence of emotional intelligence and cultural adaptability on cross-cultural adjustment and performance with the mediating effect of crosscultural competence: A study of expatriates in Taiwan. Sustainability, 13(6), 3374. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kulkov, I., Kulkova, J., Rohrbeck, R., Menvielle, L., Kaartemo, V., & Makkonen, H. (2024). Artificial intelligence‐driven sustainable development: Examining organizational, technical, and processing approaches to achieving global goals. Sustainable Development, 32(3), 2253-2267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kumaravel, S. K., Murugesan, R., Nagaram, N. B., Mohan, K. R., & Rasappan, S. (2024). Understanding shadow education: A comprehensive exploration of its global phenomenon. In Shadow Education in Asia: Policies and Practices (pp. 11-23). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Li, S., & Sanusi, E. S. (2025). Pull motivation and well-being as drivers of entrepreneurial success: The moderating role of social capital. PLoS One, 20(8), e0327894. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nazir, J., & Das, P. K. (2025). A systematic literature review on factors of perception impacting entrepreneurial success based on PRISMA framework. Journal of Innovation and [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nosike, C. J., Ojobor, O. S. N., & Nosike, C. U. (2024). Enhancing business resilience: Innovation and adaptation during and after the global pandemic. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 6(2), 217-229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Perkins, J., Nelson, S., Birley, E., Mcswiggan, E., Dozier, M., McCarthy, A., ... & Street, A. (2024). Is qualitative social research in global health fulfilling its potential?: a systematic evidence mapping of research on point-of-care testing in low-and middle-income contexts. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rasiah, R., Kaur, H., & Guptan, V. (2020). Business continuity plan in the higher education industry: University students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of academic continuity plans during COVID-19 pandemic. Applied System Innovation, 3(4), 51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ribeiro, M. A., Adam, I., Kimbu, A. N., Dayour, F., Adeola, O., & Tichaawa, T. M. (2025). Resilience in uncertainty: The impact of coping strategies on tourism entrepreneurs’ subjective well-being in subSaharan Africa. Tourism management, 110, 105169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Simarasl, N., Tabesh, P., & Jessri, M. (2024). Navigating hardships: Resilience-building coping strategies and actionable techniques for entrepreneurs. Business Horizons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tian, X., Zhao, C., & Ge, X. (2022). Entrepreneurial traits, relational capital, and social enterprise performance: Regulatory effects of cognitive legitimacy. Sustainability, 14(6), 3336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Vergara Romero, A., Durán-Román, J. L., JIMBER-DEL RIO, J. A., & Collado-González, J. C. (2025). Business management of sustainable destinations and its effect on ecotourism entrepreneurship to mitigate overtourism. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles