Environmental Information Disclosure and Financial Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Firms: Evidence from 2020–2024

This study examines the relationship between environmental information disclosure (EID) and financial performance among 2,229 listed Chinese manufacturing firms from 2020–2024. Drawing on stakeholder, resource-based, and institutional theories, the analysis explores how firm characteristics—asset size, workforce, and ownership—affect disclosure behavior and financial outcomes. Using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and panel regression, results reveal that while overall disclosure levels remain low (38.9%), larger and government-linked enterprises consistently outperform small and medium-sized firms. EID shows a significant positive association with market capitalization (β = 0.18, p < 0.01), but weaker relationships with short-term profitability (ROA, ROE). Findings suggest that environmental transparency enhances long-term market valuation rather than immediate accounting returns. Policy implications highlight the need for tiered ESG reporting frameworks, capacity-building programs for SMEs, and stronger regulatory incentives to align environmental governance with China’s “Dual Carbon” goals.

environmental disclosure, ESG, financial performance

1. Aghion, P., et al. (2018). Industrial Dynamics in China. Beijing: Economic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chen, Z., Wang, L., & Tang, Y. (2022). Government ownership and ESG disclosure in Chinese firms. Corporate Governance, 22(4), 654–668. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Eccles, R. G., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2020). The ESG-performance relationship. Financial Analysts Journal, 76(3), 60–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from 2000+ studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(4), 210–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Liu, X., & Yang, J. (2021). Financing thresholds for green transition in manufacturing. Environmental Economics Review, 8(2), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lu, Y., & Yao, Y. (2021). Industrial upgrading and consolidation in Chinese manufacturing. China Economic Review, 67, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Musacchio, A., & Lazzarini, S. G. (2014). Reinventing State Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Zhang, W., & Wang, Z. (2022). Ownership structure and ESG disclosure in emerging markets. Asian Business Review, 12(2), 112–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria