Exploring Students’ Perceptions on the Use of ChatGPT: A Thematic Analysis

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is gaining popularity in the field of education due to contemporary technological advancements. AI learning tools are significant in the current education field as they provide tremendous benefits to educators and students alike and because of their all-around performance. Among these AI systems, ChatGPT stands out as a highly sophisticated AI learning tool that has blown up immensely in the education field as it is programmed with excellent technical, mathematical and computational skills. In the English Language classroom, students use ChatGPT for unlimited tasks like completing assignments, paraphrasing and summarising sentences, searching for information and generating ideas among others. However, there was a need to find out about students’ perceptions of its usefulness as well as its limitations as a learning tool for students. Thus, this research aimed to investigate the perceptions of university students in the 21st century on the effectiveness of ChatGPT in their academics. Ten students participated in the research. A convenience sampling method was used to select students from English for Academic Purpose (EAW) course from the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). The study is qualitative in nature and data in the form of a reflective journal were collected using Google form in which students recorded their thoughts. Thematic analysis method was used to analyse students’ responses. It is hoped that the insights gained from this study will help language educators understand the benefits and challenges faced by EAW students in their writing classes.

ChatGPT, AI, Students’ Perception

1. Annells, M. (1999). Evaluating phenomenology: Usefulness, quality and philosophical foundations. Nurse Researcher, 6(3), 5–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Banovac, A. (2023). ChatGPT-3.5 as writing assistance in students ’ essays. Humanities and Social Sciences Communication, 6(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02269-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun,V. , & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18 (3), 328-352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chauhan, A. S. (2023). The Perils of Over-reliance on ChatGPT in Your Development Journey.LinkedIn. Coding Ninjas, Clarkson University, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2021). Twenty years of personalized language learning. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 205-222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Das, S.R. & J.V., M. (2024). Perceptions of higher education students towards ChatGPT usage. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 7(1), 86-106. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.583 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Garcia, I., & Pena, M. I. (2011). Machine translation-assisted language learning: Writing for beginners.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 471-487. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Han, Y. (2025). Beyond the Algorithm: Reconciling Generative AI and Human Agency in Academic Writing Education. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 39–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hasanein, A. M., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2023). Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT use in higher education : Key stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Investigating in Health, Psychology, 13, 2599–26 14. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ejihpe13110181 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jones, S., Richards, A., Cho, Y., & Lee, Y. J. (2018). The effect of the Fourth Industrial Revolution on general English education–a case study of native English instructors’ perspections at a Korean University. Korean Journal of General Education, 14(2), 169-197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Khanzode, K. C. A., & Sarode, R. D. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence and machine learning: A literature review. International Journal of Library & Information Science (IJLIS), 9(1), 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kim, N. Y., Cha, Y., & Kim, H. S. (2019). Future English learning: Chatbots and artificial intelligence. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 32-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lee, S. M. (2019). The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Navidinia, H., Aka, M., & Hendevalan, J. F. (2019). Using translation in language teaching: exploring advantages and disadvantages from linguistic, humanistic and practical perspectives. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 7(2), 12-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nayab, I. Hasaan, A. & A. K. A. (2022). Exploring teachers’ attitudes towards using chatgpt.Global Journal for Management and Administrative Sciences, 3(4), 97–111. https;//doi.org/10.46568/GJMAS.V3I4.163 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 847–86 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Porter, B., & Grippa, F. (2020). A platform for AI-enabled real-time feedback to promote digital collaboration. Sustainability, 12(24), 10243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Raman, R. (2023). Creativity in the Age of AI: Risks and Opportunities for Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 41(2), 115–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rusmiyanto, H. N., Fitriani, N., Kusumaning, N., Tyas, Rofi, A. & Nurmalia, M.N. (2023).The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in developing English Language learner's communication skills. Journal on Education. 6(1),750- 757. http://jonedu.org/index.php/joe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sari, M. N. (2023). Students’ ability and difficulties in constructing conditional sentence type II at Sman 10 Kerinci Jambi. Dharmas Education Journal, 4(1), 23-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Selwyn, N. (2023). Education and Artificial Intelligence: Navigating Ethical and Pedagogical Challenges. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 1–15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tho, C. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(17), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Vaccino-salvadore, S. (2023). Exploring the Ethical Dimensions of Using ChatGPT in Language Learning and Beyond. Languages, 8 (3),1-6. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/languages8030191 4-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT for next generation Science learning. The ACM Magazine for students, 29(3), 42-46 https://doi.org/10.1145/3589649 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study