Exploring the Challenges and Impacts of Blockchain Technology in Malaysian Supply Chain Management

Blockchain technology has gained increasing attention in supply chain management (SCM) due to its potential to enhance transparency, traceability, and trust among stakeholders. This study explores the challenges and impacts of blockchain implementation within Malaysian supply chains, addressing the limited understanding of its practical adoption. Despite global recognition of blockchain’s benefits, its uptake in Malaysia remains low, primarily due to technical, financial, and managerial barriers. A significant issue identifies is the needs of skilled professionals capable of handling blockchain systems effectively, as highlighted by the National Blockchain Roadmap 2021 – 2025 (Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, 2022), which reported that 56% of organizations cite inadequate in-house capabilities as a key constraint. To achieve the research objectives, (1) identifying challenges and (2) examining impacts of blockchain in supply chain management, an exploratory qualitative design was adopted using semi-structured online interviews with three industry practitioners. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to uncover themes and codes. The findings revealed that while blockchain enhances operational efficiency, data integrity, and collaboration, its implementation is hindered by limited expertise, financial costs, and lack of management support. The study contributes insights for industry practitioners and policymakers seeking to promote effective blockchain adoption and strengthened Malaysia’s digital transformation agenda.

Blockchain technology, supply chain management, digital transformation

1. Abdullah, R., Hassan, R., & Kassim, E. S. (2020). Blockchain technology for halal supply chain integrity: Challenges and future research directions. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(5), 1003–1018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aisyah, N., Teoh, A., & Rahman, S. (2022). Assessing blockchain readiness among Malaysian small and medium enterprises. Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics, 9(1), 45–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & supply chain management (5th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cole, R., Stevenson, M., & Aitken, J. (2019). Blockchain technology: Implications for operations and supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(4), 469–483. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kamilaris, A., Fonts, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2019). The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 91, 640–652. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kouhizadeh, M., Saberi, S., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theories and applications. Sustainability, 13(2), 475–492. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kshetri, N. (2018). 1 The emerging role of big data in key development issues: Opportunities, challenges, and concerns. Big Data for Development, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. MOSTI. (2021). National Blockchain Roadmap 2021–2025. Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation, Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pournader, M., Shi, Y., Seuring, S., & Koh, S. C. L. (2020). Blockchain applications in supply chains, transport and logistics: A systematic review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(2), 241–254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Queiroz, M. M., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2021). The role of blockchain technology in the sustainability of supply chains: A systematic literature review. Information Technology & People, 34(2), 731–775. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Queiroz, M. M., & Wamba, S. F. (2019). Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in a developing economy. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sammu, J. and Ademide, F. (2025) ‘Data privacy concerns and blockchain: Balancing transparency with human rights protections’, Journal of Digital Law and Policy, 7(1), pp. 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Teoh, A. (2021). Blockchain implementation barriers among Malaysian industries. Malaysian Journal of Management, 40(2), 35–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tian, F. (2017). A supply chain traceability system for food safety based on HACCP, blockchain & Internet of Things. 2017 International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wang, Y., Han, J. H., & Beynon-Davies, P. (2019). Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(1), 62–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Yaga, D., Mell, P., Roby, N., & Scarfone, K. (2018). Blockchain technology overview. National Institute of Standards and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study