Exploring the Underlying Dimensions of Science Learning Motivation in Secondary School Students Using a Mixed Methods Approach

This mixed methods study investigates the multidimensional nature of science learning motivation among secondary school students and its impact on engagement and academic achievement. Quantitative data collected via the Science Motivation Questionnaire II from a stratified sample of students revealed that intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, task value, and mastery goal orientation significantly correlate with engagement and academic performance in science. Self-efficacy exhibited the strongest relationships, underscoring the importance of students’ confidence in their science learning capabilities. Complementary qualitative interviews enriched these findings by capturing students’ lived experiences, highlighting how personal interest, perceived relevance, confidence, and clear goal orientation interact to drive sustained motivation. The qualitative themes illustrated the emotional and cognitive processes shaping students’ motivation, confirming the dynamic and socially situated nature of motivation in science education. Delimitations due to geographical scope, sample size, self-report biases, and complexities in integrating mixed methods findings are acknowledged. Despite these constraints, the study contributes valuable insights for educators and policymakers seeking to enhance science motivation through autonomy-supportive teaching, confidence-building interventions, and goal-focused curriculum design. The findings also emphasize the necessity of personalized motivational strategies tailored to diverse learner profiles and sociocultural contexts. This research advances theoretical understanding and offers practical recommendations for fostering motivated, engaged, and successful science learners, contributors to educational improvement efforts in contemporary science education.

Science motivation; Secondary education; Student engagement

1. Altun, S. A. (2009). An investigation of teachers’, parents’, and students’ opinions on elementary students' academic failure in Turkey. Elementary Education Online, 8(2), 567–586. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211433290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Areepattamannil, S. (2014). Relationship among achievement goals, motivation, and science achievement: A multilevel analysis of Canadian students. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3038–3052. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.94962 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brophy, J. E. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cavas, P. (2011). Factors affecting the motivation of Turkish primary students for science learning. Science Education International, 22(1), 31–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chiu, C.-Y., Hong, Y.-Y., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Culture and motivation: Implications for educational practice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy–value theory to situated expectancy–value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Glynn, S. M., & Koballa, T. R. (2023). Motivation to learn in science education. In K. Tobin & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Graham, S., & Taylor, A. Z. (2016). An attributional perspective on motivation in school settings. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 37–55). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Liu, X., Zhang, L., & Wang, C. (2022). Cross-cultural validation of the Academic Motivation Scale: Evidence from higher education students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 835462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mahzum, E., Kashefi, H., & Othman, A. R. (2020). Students’ motivation and achievement in science: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(5), 718–732. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Marzano, R. J., & Pickering, D. J. (2011). The highly engaged classroom. ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Membiela, P., et al. (2023). Motivation to learn science, emotions in science classes, and engagement towards science studies in Chilean and Spanish compulsory secondary education students. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21793 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Membiela, P., Vidal, M., & Rodríguez, B. (2023). Motivation to learn science, emotions in science classes, and engagement towards science studies in Chilean and Spanish compulsory secondary education students. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21793 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). Science as a meritocracy? Nature, 461(7267), 520–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/461520a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. Nuffield Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Palmer, D. (2005). A motivational view of constructivist-informed teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1853–1881. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2016). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Putwain, D. (2024). Science motivation, academic achievement, career aspirations. Educational Psychology Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ragusa, J. (n.d.). USC STEM education. University of Southern California STEM Education Resources. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do it. In Building autonomous learners (pp. 129–152). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Schulze, S. (2015). Identifying influences on the motivation to learn science. South African Journal of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Shih, C. C., & Gamon, J. (2001). Web-based learning: Relationships among student motivation, attitude, learning styles, and achievement. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 12–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sorge, E., Glynn, S., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2016). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Science Motivation Questionnaire II: A Rasch modeling approach. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0041-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sprinthall, N. A., & Oja, S. N. (2014). Educational psychology: A developmental approach (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tuan, H.-L., Chin, C.-C., & Shieh, S.-H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation toward science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Wentzel, K. R., & Brophy, J. (2014). Motivation at school: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar